Suppr超能文献

贝叶斯不确定结局的剂量探索设计。

A Bayesian dose-finding design for outcomes evaluated with uncertainty.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Clin Trials. 2021 Jun;18(3):279-285. doi: 10.1177/17407745211001521. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In some phase I trial settings, there is uncertainty in assessing whether a given patient meets the criteria for dose-limiting toxicity.

METHODS

We present a design which accommodates dose-limiting toxicity outcomes that are assessed with uncertainty for some patients. Our approach could be utilized in many available phase I trial designs, but we focus on the continual reassessment method due to its popularity. We assume that for some patients, instead of the usual binary dose-limiting toxicity outcome, we observe a physician-assessed probability of dose-limiting toxicity specific to a given patient. Data augmentation is used to estimate the posterior probabilities of dose-limiting toxicity at each dose level based on both the fully observed and partially observed patient outcomes. A simulation study is used to assess the performance of the design relative to using the continual reassessment method on the true dose-limiting toxicity outcomes (available in simulation setting only) and relative to simple thresholding approaches.

RESULTS

Among the designs utilizing the partially observed outcomes, our proposed design has the best overall performance in terms of probability of selecting correct maximum tolerated dose and number of patients treated at the maximum tolerated dose.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating uncertainty in dose-limiting toxicity assessment can improve the performance of the continual reassessment method design.

摘要

简介

在一些 I 期临床试验中,评估某个特定患者是否符合剂量限制毒性标准存在不确定性。

方法

我们提出了一种设计方案,可适应部分患者评估的剂量限制毒性结果存在不确定性的情况。我们的方法可应用于许多现有的 I 期临床试验设计,但我们侧重于持续重新评估方法,因为它比较受欢迎。我们假设,对于某些患者,我们观察到的不是通常的二元剂量限制毒性结果,而是医生评估的特定于给定患者的剂量限制毒性的可能性。数据扩充用于根据完全观察到的和部分观察到的患者结果,在每个剂量水平上估计剂量限制毒性的后验概率。模拟研究用于评估该设计相对于使用真实剂量限制毒性结果(仅在模拟设置中可用)的持续重新评估方法的性能,以及相对于简单阈值方法的性能。

结果

在利用部分观察结果的设计中,我们提出的设计在选择正确的最大耐受剂量的概率和在最大耐受剂量下治疗的患者数量方面具有最佳的整体性能。

结论

纳入剂量限制毒性评估中的不确定性可以提高持续重新评估方法设计的性能。

相似文献

1
A Bayesian dose-finding design for outcomes evaluated with uncertainty.贝叶斯不确定结局的剂量探索设计。
Clin Trials. 2021 Jun;18(3):279-285. doi: 10.1177/17407745211001521. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
9
Dose-finding design for multi-drug combinations.多药物组合的剂量发现设计。
Clin Trials. 2011 Aug;8(4):380-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774511408748. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Phase I Designs that Allow for Uncertainty in the Attribution of Adverse Events.允许不良事件归因存在不确定性的I期设计。
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2017 Nov;66(5):1015-1030. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12195. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
5
Continual reassessment method for partial ordering.偏序的连续重新评估方法
Biometrics. 2011 Dec;67(4):1555-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01560.x. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
6
Continual reassessment method with multiple toxicity constraints.持续评估法,具有多重毒性限制。
Biostatistics. 2011 Apr;12(2):386-98. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxq062. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
8
Sensitivity of dose-finding studies to observation errors.剂量探索研究对观测误差的敏感性。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Nov;30(6):523-30. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Jul 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验