Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Étude des Cancers de l'Ovaire et du sein (GINECO), Laboratoire CarMEN, INSERM U1060/INRA U1397, Université Lyon 1, INSA de Lyon, and Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France.
GINECO and Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;7(6):853-861. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0696.
Single-agent carboplatin is often proposed instead of a conventional carboplatin-paclitaxel doublet in vulnerable older patients with ovarian cancer. Such an approach could have a detrimental effect on outcomes for these patients.
To compare the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of single-agent carboplatin every 3 weeks, weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel, or conventional every-3-weeks carboplatin-paclitaxel in vulnerable older patients with ovarian cancer.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This international, open-label, 3-arm randomized clinical trial screened 447 women 70 years and older with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer by determining their Geriatric Vulnerability Score; 120 patients with a Geriatric Vulnerability Score of 3 or higher were stratified by country and surgical outcome. Enrollment took place at 48 academic centers in France, Italy, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, and Canada from December 11, 2013, to April 26, 2017. Final analysis database lock April 2019. Data analysis was performed from February 1 to December 31, 2019.
Patients were randomized to receive 6 cycles of (1) carboplatin, area under the curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL·min, plus paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2, every 3 weeks; (2) single-agent carboplatin, AUC 5 mg/mL·min or AUC 6 mg/mL·min, every 3 weeks; or (3) weekly carboplatin, AUC 2 mg/mL·min, plus paclitaxel, 60 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks.
The primary outcome was treatment feasibility, defined as the ability to complete 6 chemotherapy cycles without disease progression, premature toxic effects-related treatment discontinuation, or death.
A total of 120 women were randomized. The mean and median age was 80 (interquartile range, 76-83; range, 70-94) years; 43 (36%) had a Geriatric Vulnerability Score of 4 and 13 (11%) had a Geriatric Vulnerability Score of 5; 40 (33%) had stage IV disease. During its third meeting, the independent data monitoring committee's recommendation led to the termination of the trial because single-agent carboplatin was associated with significantly worse survival. Six cycles were completed in 26 of 40 (65%), 19 of 40 (48%), and 24 of 40 (60%) patients in the every-3-weeks combination, single-agent carboplatin, and weekly combination groups, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were less common with the standard every-3-weeks combination (17 of 40 [43%]) than single-agent carboplatin or weekly combination therapy (both 23 of 40 [58%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in 4 patients (2 of 40 [5%] in each combination group).
This randomized clinical trial shows that compared with every-3-weeks or weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel regimens, single-agent carboplatin was less active with significantly worse survival outcomes in vulnerable older patients with ovarian cancer.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02001272.
在有脆弱性的老年卵巢癌患者中,常提议使用单药卡铂代替常规的卡铂-紫杉醇联合治疗。这种方法可能对这些患者的结局产生不利影响。
比较脆弱的老年卵巢癌患者中使用单药卡铂每 3 周 1 次、每周卡铂-紫杉醇和常规每 3 周卡铂-紫杉醇的可行性、疗效和安全性。
设计、地点和参与者:这项国际、开放性、3 臂随机临床试验通过确定老年脆弱性评分来筛选 447 名新诊断为 III/IV 期卵巢癌且年龄在 70 岁及以上的女性;根据国家和手术结果,将 120 名老年脆弱性评分为 3 或更高的患者分层。招募工作于 2013 年 12 月 11 日至 2017 年 4 月 26 日在法国、意大利、芬兰、丹麦、瑞典和加拿大的 48 个学术中心进行。最终分析数据库锁定于 2019 年 4 月。数据分析于 2019 年 2 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日进行。
患者被随机分配接受 6 个周期的治疗:(1)卡铂,曲线下面积(AUC)5 mg/mL·min,联合紫杉醇,175 mg/m2,每 3 周 1 次;(2)单药卡铂,AUC 5 mg/mL·min 或 AUC 6 mg/mL·min,每 3 周 1 次;或(3)每周卡铂,AUC 2 mg/mL·min,联合紫杉醇,60 mg/m2,每 4 周的第 1、8 和 15 天给药。
主要结局是治疗可行性,定义为无疾病进展、过早因毒性相关治疗中断或死亡而完成 6 个化疗周期的能力。
共随机分配了 120 名女性。平均和中位年龄为 80 岁(四分位距,76-83;范围,70-94);43 名(36%)患者的老年脆弱性评分为 4 分,13 名(11%)患者的老年脆弱性评分为 5 分;40 名(33%)患者为 IV 期疾病。在其第 3 次会议上,独立数据监测委员会的建议导致试验终止,因为单药卡铂与显著更差的生存相关。每 3 周联合治疗组、单药卡铂组和每周联合治疗组分别有 26/40(65%)、19/40(48%)和 24/40(60%)的患者完成 6 个周期的治疗。与标准每 3 周联合治疗(17/40 [43%])相比,治疗相关不良事件在单药卡铂或每周联合治疗中更为常见(均为 23/40 [58%])。治疗相关死亡发生在 4 名患者中(每 40 名患者中有 2 名[5%])。
这项随机临床试验表明,与每 3 周或每周卡铂-紫杉醇方案相比,单药卡铂在有脆弱性的老年卵巢癌患者中疗效较差,生存结局明显更差。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02001272。