Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Departamento de Enfermagem, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Departamento de Enfermagem, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2021 Apr 16;55:e3677. doi: 10.1590/S1980-220X2019033203677. eCollection 2021.
To identify the interventions proposed in the literature aimed at preventing elder abuse among community-residing elders.
This was a mixed-methods systematic review that followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols checklist. The protocol of this systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. We included studies published between January 2004 and December 2019 in the databases: LILACS, IBECS, CUMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE and SciELO. The methodological quality of each study included was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
Seven studies formed the final sample. Two groups emerged after the analyses: the primary level intervention group, which used health education and coexisting elder abuse groups; and the secondary intervention level, focused mostly on the mental health care of victims of elder abuse.
There is still a shortage of intervention studies to prevent elder abuse. All the studies selected had a positive outcome, and all interventions can be implemented in nursing care practice.
确定文献中提出的旨在预防社区居住老年人受虐待的干预措施。
这是一项混合方法系统评价,遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告规范的首选报告项目清单。本系统评价的方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册处注册。我们纳入了 2004 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在以下数据库中发表的研究:LILACS、IBECS、CUMED、CINAHL、MEDLINE 和 SciELO。使用混合方法评估工具对纳入的每项研究的方法学质量进行了评估。
最终纳入了 7 项研究。经过分析后出现了两组:初级干预组,采用健康教育和并存的虐待老人问题;二级干预组,主要关注虐待老人行为受害者的心理健康护理。
预防虐待老人的干预研究仍然不足。所有入选的研究都有积极的结果,所有干预措施都可以在护理实践中实施。