Suppr超能文献

司法“成本要点”:对公共司法系统内私有化的审视

Justice "cost points": Examination of privatization within public systems of justice.

作者信息

Harris Alexes, Smith Tyler, Obara Emmi

机构信息

University of Washington.

出版信息

Criminol Public Policy. 2019 May;18(2):343-359. doi: 10.1111/1745-9133.12442. Epub 2019 May 12.

Abstract

RESEARCH SUMMARY

In addition to outsourcing the management of correctional facilities, many local and state authorities contract with private companies to provide a variety of services and processes within U.S. courthouses, jails, and prisons. In this article, we explore the various "cost points" at which individuals who make contact with public systems of justice are charged by private entities. We provide two case studies with an in-depth look at how private companies make money within U.S. justice facilities-court-ordered programs and prison services.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Through our examples, we show the extent to which private companies generate profits within U.S. systems of justice and the potential impacts of justice "cost points" on those involved in these systems. We end by suggesting policy makers more thoroughly explore the reasons for the privatization of justice system practices and services and develop transparent oversight to ensure private arrangements do not impose undue burdens on justice-involved individuals and their families.

摘要

研究总结

除了将惩教设施的管理外包外,许多地方和州当局还与私人公司签约,在美国法院、监狱和看守所内提供各种服务和流程。在本文中,我们探讨了与公共司法系统有接触的个人被私人实体收费的各种“成本点”。我们提供了两个案例研究,深入探讨了私人公司在美国司法设施(法庭命令项目和监狱服务)中如何盈利。

政策启示

通过我们的例子,我们展示了私人公司在美国司法系统中获取利润的程度以及司法“成本点”对参与这些系统的人员的潜在影响。我们最后建议政策制定者更全面地探究司法系统实践和服务私有化的原因,并建立透明的监督机制,以确保私人安排不会给涉司法人员及其家庭带来不当负担。

相似文献

1
Justice "cost points": Examination of privatization within public systems of justice.
Criminol Public Policy. 2019 May;18(2):343-359. doi: 10.1111/1745-9133.12442. Epub 2019 May 12.
2
Prison privatization and HIV prevention in Australia.
Can HIV AIDS Policy Law Newsl. 1997;3-4(4-1):35-9.
3
Palliative and end-of-life care in prisons: a content analysis of the literature.
Int J Prison Health. 2014;10(3):172-97. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-05-2013-0024.
4
Organizational context, systems change, and adopting treatment delivery systems in the criminal justice system.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Aug 1;103 Suppl 1:S1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 May 6.
5
Leveraging The Affordable Care Act To Enroll Justice-Involved Populations In Medicaid: State And Local Efforts.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Dec;34(12):2044-51. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0668.
8
Cost of schizophrenia in England.
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007 Mar;10(1):23-41.
10
Privatization and emergency medical services.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 1997 Jan-Mar;12(1):22-9. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00037171.

引用本文的文献

1
Fines, Fees, and Families: Monetary Sanctions As Stigmatized Intergenerational Exchange.
Sociol Q. 2024 Fall;65(4):469-488. doi: 10.1080/00380253.2024.2333815. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
3
Studying the System of Monetary Sanctions.
RSF. 2022 Jan 1;8(1):1-33. doi: 10.7758/rsf.2022.8.1.01.
4
The Accumulation of Disadvantage: Criminal Justice Contact, Credit, and Debt in the Transition to Adulthood.
Criminology. 2021 Aug;59(3):545-580. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12286. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
5
What Is Wrong with Monetary Sanctions? Directions for Policy, Practice, and Research.
RSF. 2022 Jan;8(1):221-243. doi: 10.7758/rsf.2022.8.1.10.
7
Debtors' Blocks: How Monetary Sanctions Make Between-neighborhood Racial and Economic Inequalities Worse.
Sociol Race Ethn (Thousand Oaks). 2022 Jan;8(1):43-61. doi: 10.1177/23326492211057817. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
8
An Assessment of Prisoner Reentry, Legal Financial Obligations and Family Financial Support: A Focus on Fathers.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 13;18(18):9625. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189625.
9
The Price of Poverty: Policy Implications of the Unequal Effects of Monetary Sanctions on the Poor.
J Contemp Crim Justice. 2021 Feb;37(1):45-65. doi: 10.1177/1043986220971395. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
10
Unveiling the Necrocapitalist Dimensions of the Shadow Carceral State: On Pay-to-Stay to Recoup the Cost of Incarceration.
J Contemp Crim Justice. 2021 Feb;37(1):66-87. doi: 10.1177/1043986220965040. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Incarceration and social inequality.
Daedalus. 2010;139(3):8-19. doi: 10.1162/daed_a_00019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验