Johnson T A
J Forensic Sci. 1987 Jan;32(1):221-4.
The movement toward private sector involvement in our correctional services and programs is growing. Before our focus is turned completely to privatization of these services, it would be prudent to analyze the "policy impact of such change. It is evident that the diverse and incompatible policies guiding the government approach to corrections and the absence of any rational planning to answer public interest goals is costly. Moreover, despite the increasing complexity of problems now confronting public authorities, little change has been made in their approach to resolving them. However, is it realistic to assume that the profit/loss barometer of the private sector can be applied in an area of social problems that are so pluralistic and ill defined? What of the many areas of potential legal concern, that is, vicarious litigation, First Amendment right of prisoners, and so forth? These are all areas that need to be researched so that any judgements or decisions made will be sound.
让私营部门参与我们的惩教服务和项目的趋势正在增强。在我们将重点完全转向这些服务的私有化之前,审慎分析这种变革的“政策影响”是明智的。显然,指导政府惩教工作的政策多样且相互矛盾,而且缺乏任何旨在实现公共利益目标的合理规划,这是代价高昂的。此外,尽管公共当局目前面临的问题日益复杂,但他们解决这些问题的方式却几乎没有改变。然而,假设私营部门的盈利/亏损晴雨表能够应用于这样一个多元且定义模糊的社会问题领域,这现实吗?众多潜在的法律问题领域,即替代诉讼、囚犯的第一修正案权利等等,又该如何看待呢?所有这些领域都需要进行研究,以便做出的任何判断或决策都能合理可靠。