• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对有困扰性记忆个体的随机对照拆解研究,比较视觉图式置换疗法(VSDT)、简化眼动脱敏再处理方案与非主动对照条件。

A randomized controlled dismantling study of Visual Schema Displacement Therapy (VSDT) vs an abbreviated EMDR protocol vs a non-active control condition in individuals with disturbing memories.

作者信息

Matthijssen Suzy J M A, Brouwers Thomas C, van den Hout Marcel A, Klugkist Irene G, de Jongh Ad

机构信息

Altrecht Academic Anxiety Centre, Altrecht GGz, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Apr 9;12(1):1883924. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1883924.

DOI:10.1080/20008198.2021.1883924
PMID:33889309
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8043526/
Abstract

: Visual Schema Displacement Therapy (VSDT) is a novel therapy for the treatment of fears and trauma-related mental health problems including PTSD. VSDT proved to be effective in reducing emotionality of aversive memories in healthy individuals in two previous randomized controlled trials and outperformed both a non-active control condition (CC) and an abbreviated version of EMDR therapy, a well-established first-line treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder. : In an effort to enhance the understanding concerning the efficacy of VSDT, and to determine its active components, a dismantling study was conducted in individuals with disturbing memories in which the effects of VSDT were tested against EMDR therapy, a non-active CC and three different VSDT-protocols, each excluding or altering a hypothesized active component. : Participants ( = 144) were asked to recall an emotional aversive event and were randomly assigned to one of these six interventions, each lasting 8 minutes. Emotional disturbance and vividness of participants' memories were rated before and after the intervention and at one and four-week follow-up. : Replicatory Bayesian analyses supported hypotheses in which VSDT was superior to the CC and the EMDR condition in reducing emotionality, both directly after the intervention and at one week follow-up. However, at four-week follow-up, VSDT proved equal to EMDR while both treatments were superior to the CC. Concerning vividness the data also showed support for hypotheses predicting VSDT being equal to EMDR and both being superior to the CC in vividness reduction. Further analyses specifying differences between the abbreviated VSDT protocols detected no differences between these conditions. : It remains unclear how VSDT yields its positive effects. Because VSDT appears to be unique and effective in decreasing emotionality of aversive memories, replication of the results in clinical samples is needed.

摘要

视觉模式置换疗法(VSDT)是一种用于治疗恐惧及与创伤相关的心理健康问题(包括创伤后应激障碍)的新型疗法。在之前的两项随机对照试验中,VSDT被证明能有效降低健康个体中厌恶记忆的情绪性,且其效果优于非活性对照条件(CC)以及眼动脱敏再处理疗法(EMDR)的简化版,EMDR是一种成熟的创伤后应激障碍一线治疗方法。

为了增进对VSDT疗效的理解,并确定其有效成分,对有困扰记忆的个体进行了一项拆解研究,在该研究中,将VSDT的效果与EMDR疗法、非活性CC以及三种不同的VSDT方案进行了对比,每种方案都排除或改变了一个假定的有效成分。

参与者(n = 144)被要求回忆一个情绪性厌恶事件,并被随机分配到这六种干预措施中的一种,每种干预持续8分钟。在干预前后以及干预后1周和4周的随访中,对参与者记忆的情绪困扰和生动程度进行了评分。

重复性贝叶斯分析支持了以下假设

在干预后直接以及干预后1周的随访中,VSDT在降低情绪性方面优于CC和EMDR条件。然而,在4周的随访中,VSDT被证明与EMDR相当,而两种治疗均优于CC。关于生动程度,数据也支持了预测VSDT与EMDR相当且两者在降低生动程度方面均优于CC的假设。进一步分析特定简化VSDT方案之间的差异未发现这些条件之间存在差异。

目前尚不清楚VSDT如何产生其积极效果。由于VSDT在降低厌恶记忆的情绪性方面似乎是独特且有效的,因此需要在临床样本中复制这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e32/8043526/faa8c55f6f97/ZEPT_A_1883924_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e32/8043526/bb6279d6382d/ZEPT_A_1883924_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e32/8043526/faa8c55f6f97/ZEPT_A_1883924_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e32/8043526/bb6279d6382d/ZEPT_A_1883924_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e32/8043526/faa8c55f6f97/ZEPT_A_1883924_F0002_B.jpg

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled dismantling study of Visual Schema Displacement Therapy (VSDT) vs an abbreviated EMDR protocol vs a non-active control condition in individuals with disturbing memories.一项针对有困扰性记忆个体的随机对照拆解研究,比较视觉图式置换疗法(VSDT)、简化眼动脱敏再处理方案与非主动对照条件。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Apr 9;12(1):1883924. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1883924.
2
Effects of "Visual Schema Displacement Therapy" (VSDT), an abbreviated EMDR protocol and a control condition on emotionality and vividness of aversive memories: Two critical analogue studies.“视觉图式置换疗法”(VSDT)、缩短版 EMDR 方案和对照条件对痛苦记忆的情绪性和生动性的影响:两项关键性模拟研究。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;63:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
3
Visual Schema Displacement Therapy versus Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing therapy versus waitlist in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: results of a randomized clinical trial.视觉模式替代疗法与眼动脱敏再处理疗法对比等待列表治疗创伤后应激障碍:一项随机临床试验的结果
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 26;15:1377108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1377108. eCollection 2024.
4
The Effects of the Flash Technique Compared to Those of an Abbreviated Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Therapy Protocol on the Emotionality and Vividness of Aversive Memories.与简化的眼动脱敏再处理疗法方案相比,快速眼动技术对厌恶记忆的情绪性和生动性的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 23;12:741163. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.741163. eCollection 2021.
5
The effect of EMDR versus EMDR 2.0 on emotionality and vividness of aversive memories in a non-clinical sample.眼动脱敏再处理(EMDR)与 EMDR 2.0 对非临床样本中厌恶记忆的情绪性和生动性的影响。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Sep 22;12(1):1956793. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1956793. eCollection 2021.
6
Auditory and Visual Memories in PTSD Patients Targeted with Eye Movements and Counting: The Effect of Modality-Specific Loading of Working Memory.通过眼球运动和计数针对创伤后应激障碍患者的听觉和视觉记忆:工作记忆的模态特异性负荷效应
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 3;8:1937. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01937. eCollection 2017.
7
Exploring expectation effects in EMDR: does prior treatment knowledge affect the degrading effects of eye movements on memories?探索眼动脱敏再处理疗法中的期望效应:先前的治疗知识会影响眼球运动对记忆的降解作用吗?
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 Jun 19;8(sup1):1328954. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1328954. eCollection 2017.
8
Reducing the Emotionality of Auditory Hallucination Memories in Patients Suffering From Auditory Hallucinations.降低患有幻听症患者幻听记忆的情绪化程度
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 18;10:637. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00637. eCollection 2019.
9
How eye movements in EMDR work: changes in memory vividness and emotionality.眼动脱敏再处理疗法中的眼动是如何起作用的:记忆清晰度和情绪的变化。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;45(3):396-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
10
Degrading traumatic memories with eye movements: a pilot functional MRI study in PTSD.通过眼球运动降解创伤性记忆:一项创伤后应激障碍的功能性磁共振成像初步研究
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2016 Nov 29;7:31371. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v7.31371. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Case report: Intensive online trauma treatment combining prolonged exposure and EMDR 2.0 in a patient with severe and chronic PTSD.病例报告:对一名患有严重慢性创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的患者采用延长暴露疗法和眼动脱敏再处理疗法(EMDR)2.0相结合的强化在线创伤治疗。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 22;15:1370358. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1370358. eCollection 2024.
2
Visual Schema Displacement Therapy versus Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing therapy versus waitlist in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: results of a randomized clinical trial.视觉模式替代疗法与眼动脱敏再处理疗法对比等待列表治疗创伤后应激障碍:一项随机临床试验的结果
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 26;15:1377108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1377108. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of "Visual Schema Displacement Therapy" (VSDT), an abbreviated EMDR protocol and a control condition on emotionality and vividness of aversive memories: Two critical analogue studies.“视觉图式置换疗法”(VSDT)、缩短版 EMDR 方案和对照条件对痛苦记忆的情绪性和生动性的影响:两项关键性模拟研究。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;63:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
2
Surprise and destabilize: prediction error influences episodic memory reconsolidation.惊喜与不稳定:预测错误影响情景记忆再巩固。
Learn Mem. 2018 Jul 16;25(8):369-381. doi: 10.1101/lm.046912.117. Print 2018 Aug.
3
The effectiveness, efficiency, and acceptability of EMDR vs. EMDR 2.0 vs. the Flash technique in the treatment of patients with PTSD: study protocol for the ENHANCE randomized controlled trial.
眼动脱敏再处理疗法(EMDR)与眼动脱敏再处理疗法2.0(EMDR 2.0)及快速疗法治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者的有效性、效率及可接受性:ENHANCE随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 9;14:1278052. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1278052. eCollection 2023.
4
A Stage 1 Pilot Cohort Exploring the Use of EMDR Therapy as a Videoconference Psychotherapy During COVID-19 With Frontline Mental Health Workers: A Proof of Concept Study Utilising a Virtual Blind 2 Therapist Protocol.一个1期试点队列:探索在新冠疫情期间将眼动脱敏再处理疗法作为视频会议心理治疗方法应用于一线心理健康工作者的情况——一项采用虚拟双治疗师方案的概念验证研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 6;13:901855. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901855. eCollection 2022.
5
The Effects of the Flash Technique Compared to Those of an Abbreviated Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Therapy Protocol on the Emotionality and Vividness of Aversive Memories.与简化的眼动脱敏再处理疗法方案相比,快速眼动技术对厌恶记忆的情绪性和生动性的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 23;12:741163. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.741163. eCollection 2021.
6
The effect of EMDR versus EMDR 2.0 on emotionality and vividness of aversive memories in a non-clinical sample.眼动脱敏再处理(EMDR)与 EMDR 2.0 对非临床样本中厌恶记忆的情绪性和生动性的影响。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Sep 22;12(1):1956793. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1956793. eCollection 2021.
The relative effectiveness of extinction and counter-conditioning in diminishing children's fear.
消退和对抗条件作用在减少儿童恐惧方面的相对效果。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Aug;95:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 11.
4
Randomized controlled trials - a matter of design.随机对照试验——设计问题
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Jun 10;12:1341-9. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S101938. eCollection 2016.
5
Self-esteem treatment in anxiety: A randomized controlled crossover trial of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) versus Competitive Memory Training (COMET) in patients with anxiety disorders.自尊治疗焦虑:眼动脱敏再处理(EMDR)与竞争性记忆训练(COMET)治疗焦虑障碍患者的随机对照交叉试验。
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Jul;82:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
6
Working memory: theories, models, and controversies.工作记忆:理论、模型与争议
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:1-29. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
7
Intrusive images in psychological disorders: characteristics, neural mechanisms, and treatment implications.心理障碍中的侵入性图像:特征、神经机制及治疗意义。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Jan;117(1):210-32. doi: 10.1037/a0018113.
8
Inducing and modulating intrusive emotional memories: a review of the trauma film paradigm.诱发和调节侵入性情绪记忆:创伤电影范式综述
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Mar;127(3):553-66. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.11.002. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
9
Emotional memories are not all created equal: evidence for selective memory enhancement.并非所有情绪记忆都是相同的:选择性记忆增强的证据。
Learn Mem. 2006 Nov-Dec;13(6):711-8. doi: 10.1101/lm.388906. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
10
Blinking suppresses the neural response to unchanging retinal stimulation.眨眼会抑制对视网膜持续刺激的神经反应。
Curr Biol. 2005 Jul 26;15(14):1296-300. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.025.