Kang Wenzhe, Zhou Lingjiu, Liu Dianhai, Wang Zhengwei
College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Engineering Research Center of Safety and Energy Saving Technology for Water Supply Network System, Beijing, China.
Sci Prog. 2021 Apr-Jun;104(2):36850421998865. doi: 10.1177/0036850421998865.
Previous researches has shown that inlet backflow may occur in a centrifugal pump when running at low-flow-rate conditions and have nonnegligible effects on cavitation behaviors (e.g. mass flow gain factor) and cavitation stability (e.g. cavitation surge). To analyze the influences of backflow in impeller inlet, comparative studies of cavitating flows are carried out for two typical centrifugal pumps. A series of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were carried out for the cavitating flows in two pumps, based on the RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Naiver-Stokes) solver with the turbulence model of - shear stress transport and homogeneous multiphase model. The cavity volume in Pump A (with less reversed flow in impeller inlet) decreases with the decreasing of flow rate, while the cavity volume in Pump B (with obvious inlet backflow) reach the minimum values at = 0.1285 and then increase as the flow rate decreases. For Pump A, the mass flow gain factors are negative and the absolute values increase with the decrease of cavitation number for all calculation conditions. For Pump B, the mass flow gain factors are negative for most conditions but positive for some conditions with low flow rate coefficients and low cavitation numbers, reaching the minimum value at condition of = 0.151 for most cases. The development of backflow in impeller inlet is found to be the essential reason for the great differences. For Pump B, the strong shearing between backflow and main flow lead to the cavitation in inlet tube. The cavity volume in the impeller decreases while that in the inlet tube increases with the decreasing of flow rate, which make the total cavity volume reaches the minimum value at = 0.1285 and then the mass flow gain factor become positive. Through the transient calculations for cavitating flows in two pumps, low-frequency fluctuations of pressure and flow rate are found in Pump B at some off-designed conditions (e.g. = 0.107, = 0.195). The relations among inlet pressure, inlet flow rate, cavity volume, and backflow are analyzed in detail to understand the periodic evolution of low-frequency fluctuations. Backflow is found to be the main reason which cause the positive value of mass flow gain factor at low-flow-rate conditions. Through the transient simulations of cavitating flow, backflow is considered as an important aspect closely related to the hydraulic stability of cavitating pumping system.
先前的研究表明,离心泵在低流量工况下运行时可能会出现进口回流,并且对空化行为(如质量流量增益系数)和空化稳定性(如空化喘振)有不可忽视的影响。为了分析叶轮进口回流的影响,对两台典型离心泵的空化流动进行了对比研究。基于采用剪切应力输运湍流模型和均匀多相模型的雷诺平均纳维 - 斯托克斯(RANS)求解器,对两台泵内的空化流动进行了一系列计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟。泵A(叶轮进口回流较少)的空腔体积随流量减小而减小,而泵B(进口回流明显)的空腔体积在流量系数(Q) = 0.1285时达到最小值,然后随流量减小而增大。对于泵A,在所有计算工况下,质量流量增益系数均为负且绝对值随空化数减小而增大。对于泵B,在大多数工况下质量流量增益系数为负,但在一些低流量系数和低空化数工况下为正,在大多数情况下在流量系数(Q) = 0.151工况下达到最小值。发现叶轮进口回流的发展是造成巨大差异的根本原因。对于泵B,回流与主流之间的强烈剪切导致进口管内发生空化。随着流量减小,叶轮内的空腔体积减小而进口管内的空腔体积增大,这使得总空腔体积在流量系数(Q) = 0.1285时达到最小值,然后质量流量增益系数变为正值。通过对两台泵内空化流动的瞬态计算,发现在泵B的一些非设计工况(如流量系数(Q) = 0.107,空化数(\sigma) = 0.195)下存在压力和流量的低频波动。详细分析了进口压力、进口流量、空腔体积和回流之间的关系,以了解低频波动的周期性演变。发现回流是导致低流量工况下质量流量增益系数为正值的主要原因。通过空化流动的瞬态模拟,回流被认为是与空化泵系统水力稳定性密切相关的一个重要方面。