• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紫杉醇洗脱球囊与普通球囊血管成形术治疗血液透析患者中心静脉狭窄的功能通畅率比较:一项个体内比较研究。

Comparison of functional patency rates between paclitaxel-eluting versus plain balloon angioplasty in hemodialysis patients with central venous stenosis: An intra-individual comparison study.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Radiology, Istanbul Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Ther Apher Dial. 2022 Feb;26(1):185-190. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.13662. Epub 2021 May 8.

DOI:10.1111/1744-9987.13662
PMID:33891365
Abstract

Central venous stenosis (CVS) is usually a late-diagnosed clinical entity that is common in hemodialysis patients. It causes various problems ranging from hemodialysis difficulty to loss of the arterio-venous (A-V) fistula. In the present study, we aimed to determine the effect of drug eluting balloon while excluding the influence of other variable factors by evaluating the same individuals with plain and paclitaxel-eluting balloons. This research was a prospective study of 18 symptomatic hemodialysis patients (age 50.9 ± 14.0 years, range 32-72 years; 11 male, 7 female) with CVS who underwent treatment by plain balloon angioplasty (PBA) and paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty (PEBA) in our hospital from January 2016 to June 2017. First, third and sixth month central vein patency rates were compared. The median patency rates of central veins were 109.0 (range: 10-324) days after PBA and 238.5 (range: 157-501) days after PEBA (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between PBA and PEBA angioplasty in one-month patency (p ˃ 0.05). By contrast, a statistically significant difference was found between 3- and 6-month patency rates (p = 0.031 and p ˂ 0.001, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the primary cumulative patency rate of PEBA was significantly longer than that of PBA (p ˂ 0.001). In this prospective study, PEBA patency is superior to PBA patency in the treatment of CVS in dialysis patients.

摘要

中心静脉狭窄(CVS)通常是一种晚期诊断的临床实体,在血液透析患者中很常见。它会导致各种问题,从血液透析困难到动静脉(A-V)瘘失。在本研究中,我们旨在通过评估使用普通球囊和紫杉醇洗脱球囊的同一患者,来确定药物洗脱球囊的效果,同时排除其他可变因素的影响。这项研究是对 2016 年 1 月至 2017 年 6 月在我院接受普通球囊血管成形术(PBA)和紫杉醇洗脱球囊血管成形术(PEBA)治疗的 18 例有症状的 CVS 血液透析患者(年龄 50.9±14.0 岁,范围 32-72 岁;男性 11 例,女性 7 例)进行的前瞻性研究。首先比较了第 1、3 和 6 个月的中心静脉通畅率。PBA 后中心静脉通畅率的中位数为 109.0(范围:10-324)天,PEBA 后为 238.5(范围:157-501)天(p<0.001)。PBA 和 PEBA 血管成形术在 1 个月通畅率方面无统计学差异(p>0.05)。相比之下,3 个月和 6 个月的通畅率有统计学差异(p=0.031 和 p<0.001)。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,PEBA 的原发性累积通畅率明显长于 PBA(p<0.001)。在这项前瞻性研究中,PEBA 的通畅率在治疗透析患者 CVS 方面优于 PBA。

相似文献

1
Comparison of functional patency rates between paclitaxel-eluting versus plain balloon angioplasty in hemodialysis patients with central venous stenosis: An intra-individual comparison study.紫杉醇洗脱球囊与普通球囊血管成形术治疗血液透析患者中心静脉狭窄的功能通畅率比较:一项个体内比较研究。
Ther Apher Dial. 2022 Feb;26(1):185-190. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.13662. Epub 2021 May 8.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of death and patency after application of paclitaxel-coated balloons in the hemodialysis access.紫杉醇涂层球囊在血液透析通路中的应用后死亡和通畅率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Dec;72(6):2186-2196.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.04.525. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
3
Efficacy of Paclitaxel Balloon for Hemodialysis Stenosis Fistulae After One Year Compared to High-Pressure Balloons: A Controlled, Multicenter, Randomized Trial.紫杉醇球囊治疗血液透析狭窄瘘管一年后的疗效与高压球囊比较:一项对照、多中心、随机试验。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Mar;43(3):382-390. doi: 10.1007/s00270-019-02372-w. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
4
Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty for Dysfunctional Autogenous Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.紫杉醇涂层球囊与普通球囊血管成形术治疗功能不良的自体头静脉动静脉瘘:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1239-1247. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0067. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
5
Long-Term Outcome of a "Mother-Child" Coaxial Dual-Catheter Technique for Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty of Central Vein Stenosis or Occlusion in Hemodialysis Patients.血液透析患者中心静脉狭窄或闭塞经皮腔内血管成形术“母子”同轴双导管技术的长期疗效。
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Aug;31(4):643-650. doi: 10.1177/15266028221136434. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
6
The Efficacy of Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting Balloon Angioplasty Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty in Stenosis of Native Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistulas: An Analysis of Clinical Success, Primary Patency and Risk Factors for Recurrent Dysfunction.紫杉醇药物洗脱球囊血管成形术与标准球囊血管成形术治疗自体血液透析动静脉内瘘狭窄的疗效:临床成功率、初始通畅率及复发功能障碍危险因素分析
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019 May;42(5):685-692. doi: 10.1007/s00270-019-02171-3. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
7
The primary patency of drug-eluting balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty in hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula stenoses.药物洗脱球囊与传统球囊血管成形术治疗动静脉内瘘狭窄血液透析患者的初始通畅率比较
Jpn J Radiol. 2016 Oct;34(10):700-704. doi: 10.1007/s11604-016-0577-8. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
8
Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for symptomatic central vein restenosis in patients with hemodialysis fistulas.紫杉醇涂层球囊血管成形术治疗血液透析动静脉内瘘有症状的中心静脉再狭窄
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Feb;22(1):74-9. doi: 10.1177/1526602814566907.
9
A retrospective cohort study comparing high and low balloon inflation pressure on technical success and patency for treating central venous lesions in patients on chronic hemodialysis.一项回顾性队列研究比较了高和低球囊充气压力对慢性血液透析患者中心静脉病变治疗的技术成功率和通畅率的影响。
Ren Fail. 2021 Dec;43(1):1281-1287. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2021.1975741.
10
Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty vs. plain balloon dilation for the treatment of failing dialysis access: 6-month interim results from a prospective randomized controlled trial.紫杉醇涂层球囊血管成形术与普通球囊扩张治疗透析失败通路:前瞻性随机对照试验的 6 个月中期结果。
J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Apr;19(2):263-72. doi: 10.1583/11-3690.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study to Evaluate a Cell-Impermeable Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Stenosis or Occlusion within the Dialysis Outflow Circuit of an Arteriovenous (AV) Fistula or AV Graft (The WRAP Registry).前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究,评估一种细胞不可渗透的内假体治疗动静脉(AV)瘘或移植物的透析流出道内狭窄或闭塞(WRAP 登记研究)。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Sep;46(9):1285-1291. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03531-w. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
2
Management of Central Venous Stenoses and Occlusions.中心静脉狭窄和闭塞的处理。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Sep;46(9):1182-1191. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03461-7. Epub 2023 Jul 17.