Suppr超能文献

交错多扭钢丝与间断式单纯胸骨钢丝用于正中胸骨切开术的闭合。

Interlocking Multi-Twisted Wires Versus Interrupted Simple Sternal Wires for Closure of Median Sternotomy.

机构信息

Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Heart Surg Forum. 2021 Apr 12;24(2):E363-E368. doi: 10.1532/hsf.3663.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although closure of a sternotomy incision is usually a simple procedure, failure to do so (sternal dehiscence) is a serious complication and is an independent factor that poses a high degree of morbidity or mortality after open heart surgery. Instability of the bone fragments can lead to complete sternal breakdown, sternal wound infection, and mediastinitis. The stainless-steel encircling wire used as either interrupted simple sutures or as figure of eight sutures is the current standard method of median sternotomy closure. Interlocking multi-twisted sternal wire closure is an alternative that provides rigid sternal fixation. We aim to identify the best method of sternal closure in order to implement it as a standardised protocol for our department.

METHODS

Two-hundred patients aged 18-70 years were undergoing cardiac surgeries at Ain Shams University hospitals. They were divided into two groups: Group I included 100 patients with sternal closure using simple wire, and group II included 100 patients with sternal closure using interlocking multi-twisted wires. The day 7, 1 month, and 3 months sternal instability, superficial wound infection, ventilation time, cross-clamp time, length of ICU stay, and length of hospital stay were analyzed.

RESULTS

The incidence of sternal instability on the 7th day, 1 month, and 3 months was significantly higher in the simple wire closure group (P < 0.05). However, incidence of superficial wound infection, length of ICU stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The interlocking multi-twist is a safe, effective, and easily reproducible method for preventing sternal dehiscence.

摘要

背景

尽管胸骨切开术切口的闭合通常是一个简单的过程,但如果不进行闭合(胸骨裂开),则是一种严重的并发症,是导致心脏直视手术后发病率或死亡率高的独立因素。骨碎片的不稳定可导致完全胸骨破裂、胸骨伤口感染和纵隔炎。作为间断单纯缝线或 8 字缝线使用的不锈钢环绕线是目前正中胸骨切开术闭合的标准方法。锁定多扭曲胸骨线闭合是一种替代方法,可提供刚性胸骨固定。我们旨在确定最佳的胸骨闭合方法,以便将其作为我们科室的标准化方案实施。

方法

18-70 岁的 200 名患者在艾因夏姆斯大学医院接受心脏手术。他们被分为两组:第 I 组包括 100 名使用简单线缝合胸骨的患者,第 II 组包括 100 名使用锁定多扭曲线缝合胸骨的患者。分析第 7 天、第 1 个月和第 3 个月的胸骨不稳定、浅表伤口感染、通气时间、体外循环时间、重症监护病房住院时间和住院时间。

结果

简单线缝合组胸骨不稳定的发生率在第 7 天、第 1 个月和第 3 个月显著更高(P<0.05)。然而,两组之间的浅表伤口感染发生率、重症监护病房住院时间和机械通气时间无差异。

结论

锁定多扭曲是预防胸骨裂开的一种安全、有效且易于复制的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验