Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy.
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 23;16(4):e0250404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250404. eCollection 2021.
Physician professionalism, including anaesthesiologists and intensive care doctors, should be continuously assessed during training and subsequent clinical practice. Multi-source feedback (MSF) is an assessment system in which healthcare professionals are assessed on several constructs (e.g., communication, professionalism, etc.) by multiple people (medical colleagues, coworkers, patients, self) in their sphere of influence. MSF has gained widespread acceptance for both formative and summative assessment of professionalism for reflecting on how to improve clinical practice.
Instrument development and psychometric analysis (feasibility, reliability, construct validity via exploratory factor analysis) for MSF questionnaires in a postgraduate specialty training in Anaesthesiology and intensive care in Italy. Sixty-four residents at the Università del Piemonte Orientale (Italy) Anesthesiology Residency Program. Main outcomes assessed were: development and psychometric testing of 4 questionnaires: self, medical colleague, coworker and patient assessment.
Overall 605 medical colleague questionnaires (mean of 9.3 ±1.9) and 543 coworker surveys (mean 8.4 ±1.4) were collected providing high mean ratings for all items (> 4.0 /5.0). The self-assessment item mean score ranged from 3.1 to 4.3. Patient questionnaires (n = 308) were returned from 31 residents (40%; mean 9.9 ± 6.2). Three items had high percentages of "unable to assess" (> 15%) in coworker questionnaires. Factor analyses resulted in a two-factor solution: clinical management with leadership and accountability accounting for at least 75% of the total variance for the medical colleague and coworker's survey with high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α > 0.9). Patient's questionnaires had a low return rate, a limited exploratory analysis was performed.
We provide a feasible and reliable Italian language MSF instrument with evidence of construct validity for the self, coworkers and medical colleague. Patient feedback was difficult to collect in our setting.
医生的专业精神,包括麻醉师和重症监护医生,应在培训和随后的临床实践中不断评估。多源反馈(MSF)是一种评估系统,其中医疗保健专业人员在其影响范围内,由多个(如医疗同事、同事、患者、自我)对多个构念(如沟通、专业精神等)进行评估。MSF 已经广泛接受,用于形成性和总结性评估专业精神,以反思如何改进临床实践。
在意大利的麻醉学和重症监护研究生专业培训中,开发和心理测量分析(可行性、可靠性、通过探索性因素分析的构念效度)MSF 问卷。意大利皮埃蒙特东方大学(意大利)麻醉学住院医师计划的 64 名住院医师。主要评估结果是:开发和心理测量测试 4 个问卷:自我、医疗同事、同事和患者评估。
共收集了 605 份医疗同事问卷(平均 9.3 ±1.9)和 543 份同事调查(平均 8.4 ±1.4),提供了所有项目的高平均评分(> 4.0 /5.0)。自我评估项目的平均得分范围为 3.1 至 4.3。从 31 名住院医师(40%;平均 9.9 ± 6.2)中收回了 308 份患者问卷。同事问卷中有 3 个项目的“无法评估”比例较高(> 15%)。因素分析得出了一个两因素解决方案:占医疗同事和同事调查至少 75%总方差的临床管理与领导力和问责制,具有较高的内部一致性信度(Cronbach's α > 0.9)。患者问卷的回收率低,对其进行了有限的探索性分析。
我们提供了一种可行且可靠的意大利语 MSF 工具,具有自我、同事和医疗同事的构念效度证据。在我们的环境中,很难收集患者的反馈。