Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California.
Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
J Mol Diagn. 2021 Jul;23(7):805-815. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.03.008. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
Assessment of T-cell receptor γ gene (TRG) rearrangements is an importants consideration in the diagnostic workup of lymphoproliferative diseases. Although fragment analysis by PCR and capillary electrophoresis (CE) is the current standard of such assessment in clinical molecular diagnostic laboratories, it does not provide sequence information and is only semi-quantitative. Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assays are an attractive alternative to the conventional fragment size-based methods, given that they generate results with specific clonotype sequence information and allow for more accurate quantitation. The present study evaluated various test parameters and performance characteristics of a commercially available NGS-based TRG gene-rearrangement assay by testing 101 clinical samples previously characterized by fragment analysis. The NGS TRG assay showed an overall accuracy of 83% and an analytical specificity of 100%. The concordance rates were 88% to 95% in the V1-8, V10, and V11 gene families, but lower in the V9 gene family. This difference was mostly attributed to the incomplete polyclonal symmetry resulting from the two-tube CE assay versus the one-tube design of the NGS assay. The NGS assay also demonstrated strengths in distinguishing clonotypes of the same fragment size. This clinical validation demonstrated robust performance of the NGS-based TRG assay and identified potential pitfalls associated with CE assay design that are important for understanding the observed discrepancies with the CE-based assay.
T 细胞受体 γ 基因(TRG)重排在淋巴增殖性疾病的诊断中是一个重要的考虑因素。虽然聚合酶链反应(PCR)和毛细管电泳(CE)片段分析是临床分子诊断实验室中此类评估的当前标准,但它不能提供序列信息,并且只是半定量的。基于下一代测序(NGS)的检测方法是传统片段大小检测方法的一种有吸引力的替代方法,因为它们提供具有特定克隆型序列信息的结果,并允许更准确的定量。本研究通过测试 101 个先前通过片段分析进行特征描述的临床样本,评估了一种商业上可用的基于 NGS 的 TRG 基因重排检测的各种测试参数和性能特征。NGS TRG 检测的总体准确性为 83%,分析特异性为 100%。在 V1-8、V10 和 V11 基因家族中,一致性率为 88%至 95%,但在 V9 基因家族中较低。这种差异主要归因于与 NGS 检测的单管设计相比,CE 检测的两管设计导致不完全的多克隆对称性。NGS 检测还在区分相同片段大小的克隆型方面表现出优势。这项临床验证表明,基于 NGS 的 TRG 检测具有强大的性能,并确定了与 CE 检测设计相关的潜在陷阱,这对于理解与 CE 检测的观察差异非常重要。