• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持 OMERACT 核心领域集用于风湿病学试验中的共享决策干预:来自多步骤共识建立方法的结果。

Endorsement of the OMERACT core domain set for shared decision making interventions in rheumatology trials: Results from a multi-stepped consensus-building approach.

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Roger Guindon Hall, Room 3071, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

Department of family medicine and emergency medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021 Jun;51(3):593-600. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.03.017. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.03.017
PMID:33892937
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To gain consensus on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) core domain set for rheumatology trials of shared decision making (SDM) interventions.

METHODS

The process followed the OMERACT Filter 2.1 methodology, and used consensus-building methods, with patients involved since the inception. After developing the draft core domain set in previous research, we conducted five steps: (i) improving the draft core domain set; (ii) developing and disseminating white-board videos to promote its understanding; (iii) conducting an electronic survey to gather feedback on the draft core domain set; (iv) finalizing the core domain set and developing summaries, a plenary session video and discussion boards to promote its understanding; and (v) conducting virtual workshops with voting to endorse the core domain set.

RESULTS

A total of 167 participants from 28 countries answered the survey (62% were patients/caregivers). Most participants rated domains as relevant (81%-95%) and clear (82%-93%). A total of 149 participants (n = 48 patients/caregivers, 101 clinicians/researchers) participated in virtual workshops and voted on the proposed core domain set which received endorsement by 95%. Endorsed domains are: 1- Knowledge of options, their potential benefits and harms; 2- Chosen option aligned with each patient's values and preferences; 3- Confidence in the chosen option; 4- Satisfaction with the decision-making process; 5- Adherence to the chosen option and 6- Potential negative consequences of the SDM intervention.

CONCLUSION

We achieved consensus among an international group of stakeholders on the OMERACT core domain set for rheumatology trials of SDM interventions. Future research will develop the Core Outcome Measurement Set.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Prior to this study, there had been no consensus on the OMERACT core domain set for SDM interventions. The current study shows that the OMERACT core domain set achieved a high level of endorsement by key stakeholders, including patients/caregivers, clinicians and researchers.

摘要

目的

就风湿病共同决策(SDM)干预措施的风湿病试验的 OMERACT 核心领域集达成共识。

方法

该过程遵循 OMERACT Filter 2.1 方法,并使用自始至终都有患者参与的共识建立方法。在之前的研究中制定了核心领域草案后,我们进行了五个步骤:(i)改进核心领域草案;(ii)制定和传播白板视频以促进理解;(iii)进行电子调查以收集对核心领域草案的反馈;(iv)确定核心领域集并制定摘要、全体会议视频和讨论板以促进理解;(v)进行虚拟研讨会并投票支持核心领域集。

结果

共有来自 28 个国家的 167 名参与者回答了调查(62%为患者/照顾者)。大多数参与者认为各领域具有相关性(81%-95%)和清晰度(82%-93%)。共有 149 名参与者(n=48 名患者/照顾者,101 名临床医生/研究人员)参加了虚拟研讨会,并对拟议的核心领域集进行了投票,该领域集获得了 95%的支持。支持的领域包括:1-对选择的了解,其潜在的好处和危害;2-选择的选项与每个患者的价值观和偏好一致;3-对选择的信心;4-对决策过程的满意度;5-对选择的遵守;6-SDM 干预的潜在负面影响。

结论

我们在国际利益相关者群体中就风湿病 SDM 干预试验的 OMERACT 核心领域集达成了共识。未来的研究将开发核心结局测量集。

临床意义

在这项研究之前,SDM 干预措施的 OMERACT 核心领域集尚未达成共识。本研究表明,OMERACT 核心领域集得到了包括患者/照顾者、临床医生和研究人员在内的主要利益相关者的高度支持。

相似文献

1
Endorsement of the OMERACT core domain set for shared decision making interventions in rheumatology trials: Results from a multi-stepped consensus-building approach.支持 OMERACT 核心领域集用于风湿病学试验中的共享决策干预:来自多步骤共识建立方法的结果。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021 Jun;51(3):593-600. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.03.017. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
2
Consensus on the definitions and descriptions of the domains of the OMERACT Core Outcome Set for shared decision making interventions in rheumatology trials.在风湿病临床试验中,关于 OMERACT 核心结局集共享决策干预领域的定义和描述的共识。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2024 Apr;65:152381. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152381. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
3
Toward the Development of a Core Set of Outcome Domains to Assess Shared Decision-making Interventions in Rheumatology: Results from an OMERACT Delphi Survey and Consensus Meeting.迈向制定一套核心结局指标以评估风湿病学中共享决策干预措施的发展:来自 OMERACT Delphi 调查和共识会议的结果。
J Rheumatol. 2017 Oct;44(10):1544-1550. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.161241. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
4
OMERACT Development of a Core Domain Set of Outcomes for Shared Decision-making Interventions.OMERACT 制定共享决策干预措施的核心结局集。
J Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;46(10):1409-1414. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.181071. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
5
Development of a Draft Core Set of Domains for Measuring Shared Decision Making in Osteoarthritis: An OMERACT Working Group on Shared Decision Making.骨关节炎共同决策测量核心领域草案的制定:骨关节炎国际倡议组织(OMERACT)共同决策工作组
J Rheumatol. 2015 Dec;42(12):2442-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.141205. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
6
Core Domain Set Selection According to OMERACT Filter 2.1: The OMERACT Methodology.根据 OMERACT 筛选器 2.1 选择核心领域集:OMERACT 方法。
J Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;46(8):1014-1020. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.181097. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
7
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Interventions for medication Adherence (OMERACT-Adherence) Core Domain Set for Trials of Interventions for Medication Adherence in Rheumatology: 5 Phase Study Protocol.风湿病学中的结局指标 - 药物依从性干预措施(OMERACT - 依从性):风湿病学药物依从性干预试验的核心领域集:5期研究方案
Trials. 2018 Mar 27;19(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2565-z.
8
OMERACT Core outcome measurement set for shared decision making in rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions: a scoping review to identify candidate instruments.风湿和肌肉骨骼疾病共同决策的OMERACT核心结局测量集:一项识别候选工具的范围综述
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2024 Apr;65:152344. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152344. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
9
The OMERACT Core Domain Set for Clinical Trials of Shoulder Disorders.OMERACT 肩部疾病临床试验核心域集。
J Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;46(8):969-975. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.181070. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
10
Improving benefit-harm assessment of glucocorticoid therapy incorporating the patient perspective: The OMERACT glucocorticoid core domain set.纳入患者视角以改善糖皮质激素治疗的获益-风险评估:OMERACT 糖皮质激素核心域集。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021 Oct;51(5):1139-1145. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Recommendations for physical activity and exercise in persons living with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): consensus by an international task force.《系统性红斑狼疮患者身体活动和锻炼的推荐意见:国际工作组的共识》。
RMD Open. 2024 Apr 4;10(2):e004171. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004171.
2
Maximizing the success of biosimilar implementation.最大化生物类似药实施的成功率。
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2023 Dec;19(12):757-758. doi: 10.1038/s41584-023-01048-7.
3
"I'd like more options!": Interviews to explore young people and family decision-making needs for pain management in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
“我想要更多的选择!”:探索青少年和家庭在青少年特发性关节炎疼痛管理方面决策需求的访谈。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2023 Jul 26;21(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12969-023-00849-0.
4
Big data analyses and individual health profiling in the arena of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs).风湿性和肌肉骨骼疾病(RMDs)领域的大数据分析与个人健康档案
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2022 Jun 30;14:1759720X221105978. doi: 10.1177/1759720X221105978. eCollection 2022.
5
Decision aids linked to the recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: results of the acceptability of a decision aid for patients with generalized anxiety disorder.与临床实践指南推荐相关的决策辅助工具:一项针对广泛性焦虑障碍患者的决策辅助工具可接受性的研究结果。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jun 30;22(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01899-2.
6
Improving patient pathways for systemic lupus erythematosus: a multistakeholder pathway optimisation study.改善系统性红斑狼疮患者的路径:一项多利益相关者路径优化研究。
Lupus Sci Med. 2022 May;9(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000700.