• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单平面双参数和多参数磁共振成像在前列腺癌诊断中的准确性:前列腺癌初诊患者的随机非劣效性试验。

Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.

Department of Radiology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Dec;4(6):855-862. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2021.03.007
PMID:33893066
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urological guidelines recommend multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa). The resulting increase in MRI demand might place health care systems under substantial stress.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether single-plane biparametric MRI (fast MRI) workup could represent an alternative to mpMRI in the detection of clinically significant (cs) PCa.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between April 2018 and February 2020, 311 biopsy-naïve men aged ≤75 yr with PSA ≤15 ng/ml and negative digital rectal examination were randomly assigned to 1.5-T fast MRI (n = 213) or mpMRI (n = 98).

INTERVENTION

All MRI examinations were classified according to Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2. Men scored PI-RADS 1-2 underwent 12-core standard biopsy (SBx) and those with PI-RADS 4-5 on fast MRI or PI-RADS 3-5 on mpMRI underwent targeted biopsy in combination with SBx. Equivocal cases on fast MRI (PI-RADS 3) underwent mpMRI and then biopsy according to the findings.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was to compare the detection rate of csPCa in both study arms, setting a 10% difference for noninferiority. The secondary outcome was to assess the role of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) in ruling out men who could avoid biopsy among those with equivocal findings on fast MRI.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The overall MRI detection rate for csPCa was 23.5% (50/213; 95% confidence interval [CI] 18.0-29.8%) with fast MRI and 32.7% (32/98; 95% CI 23.6-42.9%) with mpMRI (difference 9.2%; p = 0.09). The reproducibility of the study could have been affected by its single-center nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Fast MRI followed by mpMRI in equivocal cases is not inferior to mpMRI in the detection of csPCa among biopsy-naïve men aged ≤75 yr with PSA ≤15 ng/ml and negative digital rectal examination. These findings could pave the way to broader use of MRI for PCa diagnosis.

PATIENT SUMMARY

A faster MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) protocol with no contrast agent and fewer scan sequences for examination of the prostate is not inferior to the typical MRI approach in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. If our findings are confirmed in other studies, fast MRI could represent a time-saving and less invasive examination for men with suspicion of prostate cancer. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03693703.

摘要

背景

泌尿科指南建议对怀疑患有前列腺癌(PCa)的男性进行多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)检查。这导致 MRI 需求的增加可能会使医疗保健系统承受巨大压力。

目的

确定单平面双参数磁共振成像(快速 MRI)检查是否可以替代 mpMRI 用于检测临床显著(cs)PCa。

设计、地点和参与者:2018 年 4 月至 2020 年 2 月,311 名年龄≤75 岁、PSA≤15ng/ml 且直肠指检阴性的活检初治男性被随机分配至 1.5-T 快速 MRI(n=213)或 mpMRI(n=98)组。

干预措施

所有 MRI 检查均根据前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)版本 2 进行分类。PI-RADS 评分 1-2 分的男性接受 12 针标准活检(SBx),快速 MRI 评分 4-5 分或 mpMRI 评分 3-5 分的男性接受靶向活检联合 SBx。快速 MRI 评分 3 分的可疑病例进行 mpMRI 检查,然后根据检查结果进行活检。

结局测量和统计分析

主要结局是比较两种研究臂中 csPCa 的检出率,设定非劣效性差异为 10%。次要结局是评估前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)在排除快速 MRI 检查中可疑病例中可避免活检的男性中的作用。

结果和局限性

快速 MRI 检查 csPCa 的总检出率为 23.5%(50/213;95%置信区间 [CI] 18.0-29.8%),mpMRI 检查的检出率为 32.7%(32/98;95% CI 23.6-42.9%)(差异 9.2%;p=0.09)。该研究的可重复性可能受到其单中心性质的影响。

结论

对于年龄≤75 岁、PSA≤15ng/ml 且直肠指检阴性的活检初治男性,在快速 MRI 检查后行 mpMRI 检查,在检测 csPCa 方面并不逊于 mpMRI 检查。这些发现可能为更广泛地将 MRI 用于 PCa 诊断铺平道路。

患者概况

一种无造影剂、扫描序列更少的更快 MRI 检查前列腺的方案,在检测临床显著前列腺癌方面并不逊于典型的 MRI 方法。如果其他研究也证实了我们的发现,那么快速 MRI 可能成为怀疑患有前列腺癌的男性一种节省时间且侵袭性更小的检查方法。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT03693703。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men.单平面双参数和多参数磁共振成像在前列腺癌诊断中的准确性:前列腺癌初诊患者的随机非劣效性试验。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Dec;4(6):855-862. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
2
Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.经会阴模板引导式饱和与靶向前列腺活检的男性前列腺癌检出率。
Prostate. 2022 Feb;82(3):388-396. doi: 10.1002/pros.24286. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
3
Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.前列腺机器人辅助经会阴融合前列腺活检前前列腺双参数与多参数 MRI 的头对头比较。
World J Urol. 2022 Oct;40(10):2431-2438. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04120-1. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
4
Fluorine-18-labelled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose and Localise Prostate Cancer. A Prospective Single-arm Paired Comparison (PEDAL).氟-18 标记的前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像用于诊断和定位前列腺癌。一项前瞻性单臂配对比较(PEDAL)。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Oct;7(5):1015-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.002. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
5
Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.经直肠超声引导前列腺活检与多参数前列腺磁共振成像引导活检在前列腺特异性抗原升高的初次活检男性中的头对头比较:一项大型前瞻性多中心临床研究。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
6
MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.MRI 联合 PSA 密度在检测 PSA 血清水平为 4∼10ng/mL 的患者中具有临床意义的前列腺癌:双参数与多参数 MRI。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 Apr;101(4):235-244. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
7
The "Is mpMRI Enough" or IMRIE Study: A Multicentre Evaluation of Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared with Biopsy.“mpMRI 是否足够”或 IMRIE 研究:一项多中心研究,比较了活检前多参数磁共振成像与活检。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Sep;7(5):1027-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.09.012. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
8
Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.评估多参数磁共振成像阳性在疑似前列腺癌年轻男性中的临床价值。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Aug;4(4):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
9
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening at the Age of 45 Years: Results from the First Screening Round of the PROBASE Trial.45 岁时前列腺癌筛查的多参数磁共振成像:PROBASE 试验首轮筛查结果。
Eur Urol. 2024 Feb;85(2):105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.09.027. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
10
How to optimize follow-up in patients with a suspicious multiparametric MRI and a subsequent negative targeted prostate biopsy. Results from a large, single-institution series.如何优化多参数磁共振成像可疑且随后靶向前列腺穿刺活检结果为阴性患者的随访。来自一个大型单机构系列研究的结果。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Mar;40(3):103.e17-103.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.09.015. Epub 2021 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Head-to-head comparison of diagnostic test accuracy between biparametric and multiparametric MRI: an updated systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis.双参数与多参数MRI诊断测试准确性的直接比较:一项更新的系统评价和双变量Meta分析
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1038/s41391-025-00999-0.
2
AI-powered prostate cancer detection: a multi-centre, multi-scanner validation study.人工智能驱动的前列腺癌检测:一项多中心、多扫描仪验证研究。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Feb 28. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11323-0.
3
Advanced Restriction Imaging and Reconstruction Technology for Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (ART-Pro): A Study Protocol for a Multicenter, Multinational Trial Evaluating Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Advanced, Quantitative Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
前列腺磁共振成像的先进限制成像与重建技术(ART-Pro):一项多中心、多国试验的研究方案,评估双参数磁共振成像和先进的定量扩散磁共振成像用于前列腺癌检测的情况。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Dec 20;71:132-143. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.12.003. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Positive Predictive Value of High-Grade Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System V2.1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings for Prostate Cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统V2.1磁共振成像结果对前列腺癌的阳性预测值
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2024 Oct;34(Spec Iss 1):23-30. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v34i1.5S.
5
Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in a diverse, multiethnic population.双参数与多参数 MRI 检测不同种族、多民族人群中具有临床意义的前列腺癌的比较。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Jul;49(7):2491-2498. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04332-6. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
6
Biparametric MRI in prostate cancer during active surveillance: is it safe?前列腺癌主动监测中的双参数 MRI:安全吗?
Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct;34(10):6217-6226. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10770-z. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
7
Prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness using magnetic resonance imaging radiomics: a dual-center study.利用磁共振成像放射组学预测前列腺癌侵袭性:一项双中心研究。
Discov Oncol. 2024 Apr 16;15(1):122. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-00980-8.
8
Development and validation of a clinical decision support system based on PSA, microRNAs, and MRI for the detection of prostate cancer.基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、微小RNA(microRNAs)和磁共振成像(MRI)的前列腺癌检测临床决策支持系统的开发与验证
Eur Radiol. 2024 Aug;34(8):5108-5117. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10542-1. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
9
A Review of Modern Imaging Landscape for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Clinical Guide.前列腺癌现代影像学综述:全面临床指南
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 2;12(3):1186. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031186.
10
The use of advanced imaging in guiding the further investigation and treatment of primary prostate cancer.在指导原发性前列腺癌的进一步检查和治疗中使用先进的影像学方法。
Cancer Imaging. 2022 Sep 3;22(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40644-022-00481-3.