Suppr超能文献

新型天然口服造影剂(LumiVision®)在动态磁共振吞咽成像中的性能

Performance of a new natural oral contrast agent (LumiVision®) in dynamic MR swallowing.

作者信息

Kulinna-Cosentini Christiane, Arnoldner Michael A, Schima Wolfgang, Kristo Ivan, Schoppmann Sebastian F, Weber Michael, Cosentini Enrico P

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Göttlicher Heiland Krankenhaus, Barmherzige Schwestern Krankenhaus, and Sankt Josef Krankenhaus, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2021 Nov;31(11):8578-8585. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07927-5. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate image quality by first use of LumiVision® in dynamic MR swallowing, a contrast medium consisting of biological substances versus a gadolinium-buttermilk mixture in patients who underwent Nissen fundoplication due to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

The protocol of this retrospective study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board. A hundred twenty-nine patients (146 examinations) underwent a dynamic MR swallowing study (at 1.5 T or 3.0 T) and received an oral contrast agent. Two readers evaluated the distention of the esophagus, contrast, and traceability of the bolus in a 3-point scale. A steady-state coherent sequence (B-FFE, TrueFISP) was used. The patients were divided into 3 different groups: 53 patients received gadolinium chelate (Dotarem®)-buttermilk mixture (GBM) in a dilution of 1:40 as an oral contrast agent; 44 patients received LumiVision® water mixture (LWM) in a dilution of 1:1 and 49 patients received LumiVision® (L) undiluted.

RESULTS

GBM showed significantly better results in overall evaluation for both readers in contrast to LWM (p = .003, p = .002). L also reached significantly better results in overall evaluation than LWM in both readers (p = .004, p = .042). There was no significant difference in the overall evaluation between L and GBM (p = .914, p = .376).According to Landis and Koch, interobserver agreement was "substantial" (Cohen's kappa = 0.738) between both readers.

CONCLUSION

LumiVision® undiluted showed equal image quality compared to gadolinium-buttermilk mixture. The constellation of LumiVision® water mixture led to a clearly negative result in relation to the image quality compared to LumiVision® undiluted. Therefore, oral ingestion of LumiVision® undiluted is recommended for MR swallowing examinations.

KEY POINTS

• LumiVision® undiluted shows significantly better image quality in comparison to LumiVision® diluted in oral application in swallowing MRI. • LumiVision® undiluted shows equal image quality in comparison to gadolinium-buttermilk mixture in oral application. • Oral ingestion of LumiVision® undiluted can replace gadolinium-buttermilk mixture in oral MR examinations.

摘要

目的

在因胃食管反流病(GERD)接受nissen胃底折叠术的患者中,首次使用LumiVision®进行动态磁共振吞咽成像时,评估由生物物质组成的造影剂与钆 - 酪乳混合物的图像质量。

方法

本回顾性研究方案经当地机构审查委员会批准。129例患者(146次检查)接受了动态磁共振吞咽研究(1.5T或3.0T)并口服了造影剂。两名阅片者以3分制评估食管扩张、对比度和造影剂团块的可追踪性。使用稳态相干序列(B - FFE,TrueFISP)。患者分为3组:53例患者接受稀释比例为1:40的钆螯合物(Dotarem®) - 酪乳混合物(GBM)作为口服造影剂;44例患者接受稀释比例为1:1的LumiVision®水混合物(LWM);49例患者接受未稀释的LumiVision®(L)。

结果

与LWM相比,GBM在两位阅片者的总体评估中均显示出明显更好的结果(p = 0.003,p = 0.002)。L在两位阅片者的总体评估中也比LWM有明显更好的结果(p = 0.004,p = 0.042)。L和GBM之间的总体评估无显著差异(p = 0.914,p = 0.376)。根据Landis和Koch的标准,可以得出两位阅片者之间的观察者间一致性为“高度一致”(Cohen's kappa = 0.738)。

结论

与钆 - 酪乳混合物相比,未稀释的LumiVision®显示出同等的图像质量。与未稀释的LumiVision®相比,LumiVision®水混合物的图像质量明显较差。因此,建议在磁共振吞咽检查中口服未稀释的LumiVision®。

要点

• 在吞咽MRI的口服应用中,未稀释的LumiVision®与稀释的LumiVision®相比,图像质量明显更好。• 在口服应用中,未稀释的LumiVision®与钆 - 酪乳混合物相比,图像质量相当。• 在口服磁共振检查中,口服未稀释的LumiVision®可替代钆 - 酪乳混合物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e6/8523424/7e5940a790d6/330_2021_7927_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验