Suppr超能文献

变革理论模型深化在线学习评估。

Theory of change models deepen online learning evaluation.

机构信息

Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.

Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2021 Oct;88:101945. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101945. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have gained traction as resources for professional development. This article presents the method that we used to evaluate a professional development MOOC for postdoctoral trainees that was created by a university consortium in the US. Most approaches to evaluating MOOCs focus on analysis of participation, outcomes from course assignments, self-reported learning outcomes, course completion and user pathways through the online content or clickstream data. Few published evaluations describe in detail how learning happens within online courses and the anticipated medium and longer term cognitive and behavioral outcomes on participants. This work aims to guide those who are designing, implementing and evaluating MOOCs through applying theories of change to focus evaluation on the process of learning. This approach can be used as a complement to traditional approaches for evaluating MOOCs. We described how we worked with the MOOC team building the content to develop a theory of change for each module (or lesson) within the MOOC and used the theory of change to guide evaluation of short and medium term participant cognitive, affective and attitudinal, and behavioral outcomes. Finally, we share lessons learned and suggestions for implementing theories of change in both the design and evaluation phases of MOOC development.

摘要

大规模开放在线课程(MOOCs)作为专业发展资源受到了关注。本文介绍了我们用于评估由美国大学联盟创建的面向博士后培训生的专业发展 MOOC 的方法。大多数 MOOC 评估方法侧重于分析参与度、课程作业的结果、自我报告的学习成果、课程完成情况以及用户通过在线内容或点击流数据的路径。很少有发表的评估详细描述了在线课程中的学习过程,以及参与者预期的中期和长期认知和行为结果。这项工作旨在通过应用变革理论来指导那些设计、实施和评估 MOOC 的人,将评估重点放在学习过程上。这种方法可以作为传统 MOOC 评估方法的补充。我们描述了我们如何与 MOOC 团队合作构建内容,为 MOOC 中的每个模块(或课程)制定变革理论,并使用变革理论来指导对短期和中期参与者认知、情感和态度以及行为结果的评估。最后,我们分享在 MOOC 开发的设计和评估阶段实施变革理论的经验教训和建议。

相似文献

1
Theory of change models deepen online learning evaluation.
Eval Program Plann. 2021 Oct;88:101945. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101945. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
3
Benefits of Massive Open Online Course Participation: Deductive Thematic Analysis.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 8;22(7):e17318. doi: 10.2196/17318.
4
Protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation of a massive open online course on real world evidence.
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 13;8(8):e025188. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025188.
6
Who can benefit more from massive open online courses? A prospective cohort study.
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 May;76:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
7
Massive open online courses in U.S. healthcare education: Practical considerations and lessons learned from implementation.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Jun;10(6):736-743. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
8
A strategy for monitoring and evaluating massive open online courses.
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Aug;57:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 May 7.
10
Massive open online course adoption amongst newly graduated health care providers.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 Oct;27(4):919-930. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10113-x. Epub 2022 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Copywriters' preference evaluation on online copywriting course attributes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
PLoS One. 2024 May 23;19(5):e0292467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292467. eCollection 2024.
3
Preparing future STEM faculty through flexible teaching professional development.
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 12;18(10):e0276349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276349. eCollection 2023.
4
A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers.
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 14;18(6):e0275767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275767. eCollection 2023.
5
A perspective of massive open online courses (MOOCs) and public health.
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 14;10:1058383. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1058383. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Benefits of Massive Open Online Course Participation: Deductive Thematic Analysis.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 8;22(7):e17318. doi: 10.2196/17318.
2
Massive Open Online Course Evaluation Methods: Systematic Review.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 27;22(4):e13851. doi: 10.2196/13851.
3
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) Evaluation Methods: Protocol for a Systematic Review.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 7;8(3):e12087. doi: 10.2196/12087.
4
The MOOC pivot.
Science. 2019 Jan 11;363(6423):130-131. doi: 10.1126/science.aav7958.
5
A strategy for monitoring and evaluating massive open online courses.
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Aug;57:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 May 7.
6
Education research. Rebooting MOOC research.
Science. 2015 Jan 2;347(6217):34-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1261627.
7
From recovery to regulation: an attempt to reconceptualize 'recovery from work'.
Stress Health. 2014 Aug;30(3):244-52. doi: 10.1002/smi.2604.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验