• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较气管造口术技术:比约克瓣法与气管开窗术。

Comparing tracheostomy techniques: Bjork flap vs. tracheal window.

作者信息

Kennedy Maeve M, Abdel-Aty Yassmeen, Lott David G

机构信息

Head and Neck Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 East Shea Blvd., Scottsdale, AZ 85259, United States of America.

Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 East Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Nov-Dec;42(6):103030. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103030. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103030
PMID:33894562
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Various operative techniques are used to perform tracheostomies. The objective of this study was to evaluate patient factors that influence the decision to perform a Bjork flap or a window.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent tracheostomies from January 2015 to December 2019 at a tertiary care medical center. All patients underwent tracheostomy with either a Bjork flap or a window. Charts were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, indication for tracheostomy, operative details, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 217 tracheostomies were evaluated, of which 104 (47.9%) had a Bjork flap and 113 (52.1%) had a window. Bjork flap was significantly more likely to be performed in patients with a higher average body mass index (p = 0.05), requiring ventilatory support (p = 0.0001), or had a stroke (p = 0.0140). A window was used significantly more in patients with prior neck dissection (p = 0.0110) or neck radiation (p < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed for post-op bleeding, returning to the operating room, or days to decannulation. In all tracheostomies, thrombocytopenia was found to significantly correlate with post-op bleeding (p = 0.0006), while blood thinner use did not.

CONCLUSION

Bjork flaps were more likely to be performed in those with a history of prolonged mechanical ventilation and elevated body mass index. Windows were performed more frequently in patients with a head and neck cancer history. Future prospective studies are needed to compare the outcomes of these techniques and their impacts on the trachea long term.

摘要

目的

多种手术技术可用于实施气管切开术。本研究的目的是评估影响施行比约克瓣或开窗术决策的患者因素。

方法

对2015年1月至2019年12月在一家三级医疗中心接受气管切开术的所有患者进行回顾性研究。所有患者均接受了比约克瓣或开窗术的气管切开术。查阅病历以获取人口统计学资料、合并症、气管切开术的指征、手术细节和并发症。

结果

共评估了217例气管切开术,其中104例(47.9%)采用了比约克瓣,113例(52.1%)采用了开窗术。在平均体重指数较高(p = 0.05)、需要通气支持(p = 0.0001)或患有中风(p = 0.0140)的患者中,施行比约克瓣的可能性显著更高。在既往有颈部淋巴结清扫术(p = 0.0110)或颈部放疗史(p < 0.0001)的患者中,开窗术的使用显著更多。术后出血、返回手术室或拔管天数方面未观察到显著差异。在所有气管切开术中,发现血小板减少症与术后出血显著相关(p = 0.0006),而使用血液稀释剂则无此关联。

结论

有长期机械通气史和体重指数升高的患者更有可能施行比约克瓣。有头颈癌病史的患者更频繁地施行开窗术。未来需要进行前瞻性研究以比较这些技术的结果及其对气管的长期影响。

相似文献

1
Comparing tracheostomy techniques: Bjork flap vs. tracheal window.比较气管造口术技术:比约克瓣法与气管开窗术。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Nov-Dec;42(6):103030. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103030. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
2
Preserving the thyroidal isthmus during low tracheostomy with creation of a Björk flap.低位气管切开术中保留甲状腺峡部并制作比约克皮瓣。
Laryngoscope. 2018 Dec;128(12):2783-2789. doi: 10.1002/lary.27310. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
3
A modification of the Bjork flap in tracheostomies for head and neck cancer patients.头颈部癌症患者行气管切开术时 Bjork 皮瓣的改良。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Nov;119(5):444-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 May 7.
4
A Comparative Analysis of Conventional Tracheotomy Versus Bjork Flap Tracheotomy.传统气管切开术与比约克瓣气管切开术的比较分析
Cureus. 2023 Mar 24;15(3):e36646. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36646. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
An audit of Björk flap tracheostomies in head and neck plastic surgery.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Feb;34(1):42-6. doi: 10.1016/s0266-4356(96)90134-5.
6
Early postoperative complications following tracheotomy: Does suturing technique influence outcomes?气管切开术后早期并发症:缝合技术会影响预后吗?
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022 Dec 1;8(1):156-161. doi: 10.1002/lio2.907. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Risk Factors for Posttracheostomy Tracheal Stenosis.气管切开后狭窄的危险因素。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Oct;159(4):698-704. doi: 10.1177/0194599818794456. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
8
Is Continued Perioperative Antithrombotic Therapy Safe When Performing Open Tracheostomy?行开放式气管切开术时继续围手术期抗栓治疗安全吗?
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023 Nov;132(11):1285-1292. doi: 10.1177/00034894221147807. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
9
Limited dissection and early primary closure of the tracheostomy stoma in head and neck oncology operations: a retrospective study of 158 cases.头颈部肿瘤手术中气管造口的有限解剖与早期一期缝合:158例回顾性研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;44(3):297-300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.11.013. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
10
A prospective comparative study of the functional results associated with the use of Björk flap tracheostomy versus standard tracheostomy.前瞻性比较研究使用 Björk 皮瓣气管切开术与标准气管切开术相关的功能结果。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun;49(3):1329-1335. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02223-x. Epub 2023 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Tracheostomy-related indications, early complications and their predictors among patients in low resource settings: a prospective cohort study in the pre-COVID-19 era.低资源环境下患者行气管切开术的相关适应证、早期并发症及其预测因素:COVID-19 前时代的一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2023 Mar 18;23(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01960-5.
2
Early postoperative complications following tracheotomy: Does suturing technique influence outcomes?气管切开术后早期并发症:缝合技术会影响预后吗?
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022 Dec 1;8(1):156-161. doi: 10.1002/lio2.907. eCollection 2023 Feb.