Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2E1, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2E1, Alberta, Canada.
Nutr Res. 2021 May;89:45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
Visual analogue scales (VAS) have commonly been used to assess appetite in children 8 years and older; however, these tools have been considered unreliable for children 7 years old and under. The objective of this pilot study was to develop a picture-based appetite assessment (PBAA) tool for children aged 4-10 years and pilot test it compared to a VAS-based appetite assessment. The study hypothesis was that the PBAA scores would decrease following the consumption of an ad libitum snack compared to the scores in the fasted state in children 4 to 10 years old; furthermore, there would be a good level of agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.75) between the appetite scores by the PBAA and VAS tools in children aged 8 years or older. At Visit 1, in a fasted state, all children (n = 15) completed the PBAA. Children who were 8-10 years old (n = 8) also completed the VAS-based appetite assessment. Then, an ad libitum snack was provided, and appetite assessments were repeated at 5-, 30- and 60-minutes post-snack. The same assessments were completed at visit 2 pre (fasting)- and post-consumption of a snack containing 25% of the amount consumed at visit 1 (limited snack). PBAA scores were different across time (P < .001) and between types of meal (ad libitum vs limited snack) (P = .015) in all children. A good agreement between the PBAA and VAS scores at 30 and 60 minutes after both types of meal was found (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.75). The PBAA tool was able to detect expected changes in appetite sensations and was in good agreement with the VAS instrument.
视觉模拟评分法(VAS)常用于评估 8 岁及以上儿童的食欲;然而,这些工具被认为在 7 岁及以下儿童中不可靠。本研究旨在开发一种适用于 4-10 岁儿童的基于图片的食欲评估(PBAA)工具,并与 VAS 进行对比研究。研究假设是,与空腹状态相比,4-10 岁儿童在随意进食零食后,PBAA 评分会降低;此外,在 8 岁及以上儿童中,PBAA 和 VAS 工具的食欲评分之间会有较好的一致性(组内相关系数>0.75)。在第一次就诊时,所有儿童(n=15)均在空腹状态下完成了 PBAA 评估。8-10 岁的儿童(n=8)还完成了基于 VAS 的食欲评估。然后,给予随意进食的零食,在进食后 5、30 和 60 分钟重复进行食欲评估。在第二次就诊时,在食用零食前(空腹)和食用含有第一次就诊时 25%量的零食后(限制零食),均完成相同的评估。所有儿童的 PBAA 评分在不同时间(P<0.001)和不同餐型(随意进食 vs 限制零食)(P=0.015)之间存在差异。在两种餐型后 30 和 60 分钟,PBAA 和 VAS 评分之间均存在较好的一致性(组内相关系数>0.75)。PBAA 工具能够检测到预期的食欲变化,与 VAS 仪器具有良好的一致性。