• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[关于同意概念的几点思考]

[A few reflective remarks on the notion of consent].

作者信息

Berard Karine

机构信息

Psypro Lyon, 20 rue du Général-Dayan, 69100 Villeurbanne, France.

出版信息

Soins Psychiatr. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(333):12-15. doi: 10.1016/j.spsy.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.spsy.2021.03.003
PMID:33894922
Abstract

Medical paternalism has given way to the autonomy of the patient, who remains master of the decisions he makes concerning his health. His consent, free and informed, has no value unless it is preceded by information adapted to his degree of understanding. The notion of consent raises the question of freedom, and therefore of the autonomy left to patients in their choices. Individual freedom occupies a particular place in psychiatry where it comes into confrontation with constraint. The tensions generated must lead caregivers to ask themselves the right questions in accordance with the principles of medical ethics.

摘要

医疗家长主义已让位于患者的自主权,患者仍是其自身健康相关决策的主导者。他的同意,需是自由且知情的,但若在此之前没有根据其理解程度提供相应信息,这种同意则毫无价值。同意的概念引发了自由的问题,进而涉及患者在选择时所剩的自主权问题。个人自由在精神病学领域占据特殊地位,在那里它与强制约束形成对峙。由此产生的紧张关系必然促使医护人员依据医学伦理原则来审视正确的问题。

相似文献

1
[A few reflective remarks on the notion of consent].[关于同意概念的几点思考]
Soins Psychiatr. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(333):12-15. doi: 10.1016/j.spsy.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
2
Forced to be free? Increasing patient autonomy by constraining it.被迫自由?通过限制来增加患者自主权。
J Med Ethics. 2014 May;40(5):293-300. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100207. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
3
[Consent or the breadcrumb trail of care].[同意或护理的线索]
Soins Psychiatr. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(333):20-22. doi: 10.1016/j.spsy.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
4
Paternalism and autonomy: views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country.家长作风与自主性:一个转型期(后共产主义)国家中患者与医疗服务提供者的观点
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Sep 29;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0059-z.
5
Ethical and cultural dimensions of informed consent. A case study and analysis.
Ann Intern Med. 1982 Jan;96(1):110-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-1-110.
6
[The justification for medical paternalism].
Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2004 Jan;41(1):8-15. doi: 10.3143/geriatrics.41.8.
7
Making up her mind: consent, pregnancy and mental handicap.下定决心:同意、怀孕与智力障碍
J Med Ethics. 1983 Dec;9(4):219-26. doi: 10.1136/jme.9.4.219.
8
Comment on Levy's 'Forced to be free? Increasing patient autonomy by constraining it'.
J Med Ethics. 2014 May;40(5):302-3. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100346. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
9
[Free will and patient consent during care].
Soins. 2016 Sep;61(808):21-4. doi: 10.1016/j.soin.2016.07.001.
10
Perspectives on bioethics.生物伦理学视角
Westminst Inst Rev. 1981 Jan;1(1):8-10.