Griffith School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland 4222, Australia; Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland 4222, Australia; Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia.
Griffith School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland 4222, Australia; Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland 4222, Australia; Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia.
Water Res. 2021 Jun 15;198:117133. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117133. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
Optical sensors for fluorescence of chlorophyll a (f-Chl a) and phycocyanin (f-PC) are increasingly used as a proxy for biomass of algae and cyanobacteria, respectively. They provide measurements at high-frequency and modest cost. These sensors require site-specific calibration due to a range of interferences. Light intensity affects the fluorescence yield of cyanobacteria and algae through light harvesting regulation mechanisms, but is often neglected as a potential source of error for in-situ f-Chl a and f-PC measurements. We hypothesised that diel light variations would induce significant f-Chl a and f-PC suppression when compared to dark periods. We tested this hypothesis in a controlled experiment using three commercial fluorescence probes which continuously measured f-Chl a and f-PC from a culture of the cyanobacterium Dolichospermum variabilis as well as f-Chl a from a culture of the green alga Ankistrodesmus gracilis in a simulated natural light regime. Under light, all devices showed a significant (p<0.01) suppression of f-Chl a and f-PC compared to measurements in the dark. f-Chl a decreased by up to 79% and f-PC by up to 59% at maximum irradiance compared to dark-adapted periods. Suppression levels were higher during the second phase of the diel cycle (declining light), indicating that quenching is dependent on previous light exposure. Diel variations in light intensity must be considered as a significant source of bias for fluorescence probes used for algal monitoring. This is of high relevance as most monitoring activities take place during daytime and hence f-Chl a and f-PC are likely to be systematically underestimated under bright conditions. Compensation models, design modifications to fluorometers and sampling design are discussed as suitable alternatives to overcome light-induced fluorescence quenching.
用于叶绿素 a (f-Chl a) 和藻蓝蛋白 (f-PC) 荧光的光学传感器越来越多地被用作藻类和蓝藻生物量的替代物。它们以较高的频率和适度的成本进行测量。这些传感器由于存在一系列干扰,需要进行特定地点的校准。光强通过光捕获调节机制影响蓝藻和藻类的荧光产量,但通常被忽视为原位 f-Chl a 和 f-PC 测量的潜在误差源。我们假设,与黑暗时期相比,昼夜光变化会导致 f-Chl a 和 f-PC 显著抑制。我们在一项使用三种商业荧光探针的受控实验中检验了这一假设,这些探针连续测量了一种名为 Dolichospermum variabilis 的蓝藻培养物中的 f-Chl a 和 f-PC,以及一种名为 Ankistrodesmus gracilis 的绿藻培养物中的 f-Chl a,模拟自然光照条件。在光下,与黑暗条件下的测量相比,所有设备均显示出 f-Chl a 和 f-PC 的显著抑制 (p<0.01)。与黑暗适应期相比,在最大辐照度下,f-Chl a 减少了多达 79%,f-PC 减少了多达 59%。在昼夜周期的第二阶段(光下降),抑制水平更高,表明猝灭取决于先前的光暴露。光强的昼夜变化必须被视为荧光探针用于藻类监测的一个重要偏倚源。这是非常重要的,因为大多数监测活动发生在白天,因此在明亮条件下,f-Chl a 和 f-PC 可能会被系统低估。补偿模型、荧光计设计修改和采样设计被讨论为克服光诱导荧光猝灭的合适替代方案。