Taha Asma A, Jadalla Ahlam, Bin Ali Wafaa, Firkins Jenny, Norman Sharon, Azar Najood
School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
School of Nursing, California State University, Long Beach, CA, USA.
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Nov;30(21-22):3163-3170. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15815. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
To determine the effect of adding structured simulation to a traditional classroom lecture format on students' knowledge acquisition and their evaluation of faculty teaching effectiveness, compared to traditional classroom lectures alone.
There is a critical lack of high-quality clinical placements/experiences in nursing education, particularly in clinical specialty populations, such as paediatrics. Simulation has been shown to help students practice in a safe environment. However, less is known about the outcomes of embedding simulation in didactic class sessions or classroom lectures. Additionally, data on the impact of simulation as a teaching pedagogy on faculty teaching effectiveness is limited.
Post-test, nonequivalent control group quasi-experimental study.
Students in two prelicensure nursing programs participated in a 10-week term paediatric nursing course taught by the same faculty member on two different campuses. The students at one campus, designated as the control group (n = 43), received four hours of traditional, lecture-only, instructions. The group at a second campus, the intervention group (n = 44), received the same lectures with added structured simulations. Students' knowledge acquisition and their evaluation of faculty teaching effectiveness were measured in both groups using the same standardised assessment measures. The CONSORT checklist was followed.
Students' knowledge acquisition scores and their evaluation scores of faculty teaching effectiveness were significantly higher in the intervention (simulation) group compared to the control group. A significantly higher number of students in the simulation group scored above the national average Nursing Care of Children score as compared to students in the control group.
Integrating simulation with didactic instruction enhanced students' knowledge acquisition and improved their opinion of faculty teaching effectiveness.
Augmenting lecture with simulation may provide students with learning experiences that they may not have during clinical rotation due to a lack of paediatric clinical placement sites and differences between sites.
与仅采用传统课堂讲授形式相比,确定在传统课堂讲授形式中增加结构化模拟对学生知识获取及对教师教学效果评价的影响。
护理教育中严重缺乏高质量的临床实习/体验,尤其是在儿科等临床专科领域。模拟已被证明有助于学生在安全环境中进行实践。然而,对于将模拟融入理论课程或课堂讲授的效果了解较少。此外,关于模拟作为一种教学方法对教师教学效果影响的数据有限。
后测、非等效对照组准实验研究。
两个预执业护理项目的学生参加了由同一位教师在两个不同校区讲授的为期10周的儿科护理课程。一个校区的学生被指定为对照组(n = 43),接受4小时仅为传统讲授的教学。另一个校区的小组,即干预组(n = 44),接受相同的讲授并增加了结构化模拟。两组学生均使用相同的标准化评估方法来测量知识获取情况及对教师教学效果的评价。研究遵循CONSORT清单。
与对照组相比,干预(模拟)组学生的知识获取得分及对教师教学效果的评价得分显著更高。与对照组学生相比,模拟组中得分高于全国儿童护理平均分数的学生数量显著更多。
将模拟与理论教学相结合可增强学生的知识获取,并改善他们对教师教学效果的看法。
由于缺乏儿科临床实习地点以及各地点之间的差异,用模拟来补充讲授可为学生提供他们在临床轮转期间可能无法获得的学习体验。