Suppr超能文献

比较物理治疗和关节镜下半月板部分切除术治疗退行性半月板撕裂以及联合透明质酸注射对这些治疗的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Comparison of physical therapy and arthroscopic partial meniscectomy treatments in degenerative meniscus tears and the effect of combined hyaluronic acid injection with these treatments: A randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34(5):767-774. doi: 10.3233/BMR-200284.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic degenerative meniscus tears are common in middle and old age. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM), physical therapy (PT) and hyaluronic acid injection (HAI) are the most commonly used treatment options.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study is to compare the effectiveness of APM and PT in degenerative meniscus tears and to investigate the effect of HAI with a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.

METHODS

The study included 192 patients with symptomatic degenerative meniscus tears. The patients were randomly divided into the four groups. The first group consisted of patients who underwent APM, the second group received HAI with APM, the third group received PT, and the fourth group received HAI with PT. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, and range of motion (ROM) values were used for evaluation.

RESULTS

There was no difference between four groups according to age, gender, BMI, affected side, grade of osteoarthritis. In the 4 groups, WOMAC and VAS results at the 2nd and 6th months were better than pre-treatment. There was no difference between the groups in terms of WOMAC and VAS. In terms of ROM, the results were found better in PT group (Group 3, Group 4) at the 2nd and 6th months. However, the results were found worse in APM group (Group 1, Group 2). In addition, it was found that HAI applied with APM and PT had no effect on VAS, WOMAC, and ROM. It was determined that the increase of knee osteoarthritis negatively affected both the results of APM treatment and PT. VAS, WOMAC, and ROM results were found worse in patients with stage 3 osteoarthritis than grade 1 and 2, but there was no difference between grade 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

APM and PT give good results in terms of pain and functional results. However, ROM limitation develops after APM. Conversely, there is an increase in ROM after PT. Administration of HAI with these treatments has no effect on the results. PT is an easily applicable noninvasive method. Adding HAI to the treatment has no effect on the results and increases the cost.

摘要

背景

有症状的退行性半月板撕裂在中年和老年中很常见。关节镜下部分半月板切除术(APM)、物理治疗(PT)和透明质酸注射(HAI)是最常用的治疗选择。

目的

我们的研究旨在比较 APM 和 PT 在退行性半月板撕裂中的疗效,并通过前瞻性、随机、单盲研究探讨 HAI 的效果。

方法

该研究纳入了 192 例有症状的退行性半月板撕裂患者。患者被随机分为四组。第一组接受 APM 治疗,第二组接受 APM 联合 HAI 治疗,第三组接受 PT 治疗,第四组接受 PT 联合 HAI 治疗。采用 Western Ontario 和 McMaster 大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和关节活动度(ROM)值进行评估。

结果

四组患者的年龄、性别、BMI、患侧、骨关节炎分级无差异。在 4 组中,第 2 个月和第 6 个月时 WOMAC 和 VAS 评分均优于治疗前。4 组之间 WOMAC 和 VAS 评分无差异。在 ROM 方面,第 2 个月和第 6 个月时 PT 组(第 3 组和第 4 组)的结果更好。然而,APM 组(第 1 组和第 2 组)的结果更差。此外,APM 联合 PT 应用 HAI 对 VAS、WOMAC 和 ROM 无影响。结果表明,膝关节骨关节炎的加重对 APM 治疗和 PT 的结果均有负面影响。3 级骨关节炎患者的 VAS、WOMAC 和 ROM 结果比 1 级和 2 级差,但 1 级和 2 级之间无差异。

结论

APM 和 PT 在疼痛和功能结果方面均有较好的疗效。然而,APM 后会出现 ROM 受限。相反,PT 后 ROM 会增加。这些治疗方法联合 HAI 治疗对结果无影响。PT 是一种易于应用的非侵入性方法。在治疗中添加 HAI 对结果没有影响,但会增加成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验