College of Medicine, Sulaimani University, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.
College of Medicine, Sulaimani University, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.
Knee. 2024 Oct;50:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.016. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
Knee joint osteoarthritis (OA)-related meniscal tears are still sometimes treated in centers by arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM), which is then followed by a solitary physical therapy regimen.
The present study was conducted to compare the efficacy of intra-articular injection of ozonized platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid following arthroscopic suturing, and APM to treat meniscal tear degenerative type.
In a randomized trial of prospective comparative research, 104 patients, all of whom had meniscal tears due to OA of the knee, were randomly divided into two groups. The participants in Group A (55 patients) were given intra-articular ozonized PRP and hyaluronate therapeutics, following arthroscopic suturing of meniscal tear treatment (ASMT) of degenerative knee joint OA. Group B (49 patients) was prepared for APM alone. Both groups were followed by physical therapy and a follow up visit throughout 12, 24, and 36 months. The WOMAC and Lequesne scores were evaluated.
At every follow up visit for 6, 12, and 24, months, there was a significant decline in the mean of WOMAC and Lequesne scores in Groups A and B relative to baseline. Additionally, Group A significantly (P<0.0001) outperformed Group B at 12, 24, and 36 months for both Lequesne's and WOMAC scores. There were infection, stiffness, and widespread OA knee degeneration detected in Group B while no serious adverse effects were observed in Group A.
The study's findings demonstrated that physical and intra-articular orthobiological ozonized PRP and hyaluronate therapies were more effective than APM in treating degenerative knee joint OA.
膝关节骨关节炎(OA)相关的半月板撕裂在一些中心仍然采用关节镜下部分半月板切除术(APM)治疗,然后单独进行物理治疗方案。
本研究旨在比较关节镜下缝合后关节内注射臭氧富血小板血浆(PRP)和透明质酸与 APM 治疗半月板撕裂退行性变的疗效。
在一项前瞻性随机对照研究中,104 名膝关节 OA 所致半月板撕裂患者被随机分为两组。A 组(55 例)接受关节镜下半月板撕裂治疗(ASMT)后关节内臭氧富血小板血浆和透明质酸钠治疗,B 组(49 例)仅接受 APM 治疗。两组均接受物理治疗,并在 12、24 和 36 个月进行随访。评估 WOMAC 和 Lequesne 评分。
在第 6、12 和 24 个月的每次随访中,A 组和 B 组的 WOMAC 和 Lequesne 评分均值均较基线显著下降。此外,A 组在 12、24 和 36 个月时的 Lequesne 和 WOMAC 评分均显著优于 B 组(P<0.0001)。B 组出现感染、僵硬和广泛的 OA 膝关节退变,而 A 组未观察到严重不良反应。
研究结果表明,物理和关节内生物臭氧 PRP 和透明质酸治疗比 APM 治疗退行性膝关节 OA 更有效。