Suppr超能文献

素食主义、道德动机与虚假意识

Veganism, Moral Motivation and False Consciousness.

作者信息

Pickett Susana

机构信息

School of History, Politics and International Relations, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

J Agric Environ Ethics. 2021;34(3):15. doi: 10.1007/s10806-021-09857-0. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

Abstract

Despite the strength of arguments for veganism in the animal rights literature, alongside environmental and other anthropocentric concerns posed by industrialised animal agriculture, veganism remains only a minority standpoint. In this paper, I explore the moral motivational problem of veganism from the perspectives of moral psychology and political false consciousness. I argue that a novel interpretation of the post-Marxist notion of political false consciousness may help to make sense of the widespread refusal to shift towards veganism. Specifically, the notion of false consciousness fills some explanatory gaps left by the moral psychological notion of , often understood to refer to a weakness of will. Central to my approach is the idea that animal exploitation is largely systemic and the assumption that moral motivation is inseparable from moral thinking. In this light, the primary obstacle to the adoption of veganism arises not so much from a failure to put genuine beliefs into action, but rather in a shared, distorted way of thinking about animals. Thus, common unreflective objections to veganism may be said to be manifestations of false consciousness.

摘要

尽管动物权利文献中支持纯素主义的论据有力,且工业化动物农业引发了环境及其他以人类为中心的问题,但纯素主义仍然只是少数人的立场。在本文中,我从道德心理学和政治虚假意识的角度探讨纯素主义的道德动机问题。我认为,对后马克思主义政治虚假意识概念的一种新颖解释可能有助于理解为何普遍存在拒绝转向纯素主义的现象。具体而言,虚假意识概念填补了道德心理学中常被理解为意志薄弱的“[此处原文缺失相关概念]”概念所留下的一些解释空白。我的方法的核心观点是,动物剥削在很大程度上是系统性的,以及道德动机与道德思考不可分割的假设。据此,采用纯素主义的主要障碍与其说是未能将真正的信念付诸行动,不如说是存在一种关于动物的共同的、扭曲的思维方式。因此,可以说对纯素主义常见的不假思索的反对意见是虚假意识的表现。

相似文献

1
Veganism, Moral Motivation and False Consciousness.素食主义、道德动机与虚假意识
J Agric Environ Ethics. 2021;34(3):15. doi: 10.1007/s10806-021-09857-0. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
2
If Veganism Is Not a Choice: The Moral Psychology of Possibilities in Animal Ethics.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jan 16;10(1):145. doi: 10.3390/ani10010145.
3
The Ethics of Veganism.纯素食主义的伦理道德
Cureus. 2024 Mar 15;16(3):e56214. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56214. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Integrating justice and care in animal ethics.将正义与关怀融入动物伦理。
J Appl Philos. 2004;21(2):183-95. doi: 10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00272.x.
7
Having a life versus being alive.拥有生活与仅仅活着。
J Med Ethics. 1984 Mar;10(1):5-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.1.5.

本文引用的文献

2
Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns.合理规划肉食摄入。“4N”原则。
Appetite. 2015 Aug;91:114-28. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
3
Sustainability of plant-based diets: back to the future.植物性饮食的可持续性:回到未来。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;100 Suppl 1:476S-82S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.071522. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验