• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Veganism, Moral Motivation and False Consciousness.素食主义、道德动机与虚假意识
J Agric Environ Ethics. 2021;34(3):15. doi: 10.1007/s10806-021-09857-0. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
2
If Veganism Is Not a Choice: The Moral Psychology of Possibilities in Animal Ethics.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jan 16;10(1):145. doi: 10.3390/ani10010145.
3
The Ethics of Veganism.纯素食主义的伦理道德
Cureus. 2024 Mar 15;16(3):e56214. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56214. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Vegaphobia: derogatory discourses of veganism and the reproduction of speciesism in UK national newspapers.素食恐惧症:英国国家报纸中对素食主义的诋毁性言论和物种主义的再现。
Br J Sociol. 2011 Mar;62(1):134-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01348.x.
5
Beyond the Choice of What You Put in Your Mouth: A Systematic Mapping Review of Veganism and Vegan Identity.超越你口中食物的选择:对素食主义和素食身份认同的系统映射综述
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 10;13:848434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848434. eCollection 2022.
6
Integrating justice and care in animal ethics.将正义与关怀融入动物伦理。
J Appl Philos. 2004;21(2):183-95. doi: 10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00272.x.
7
Having a life versus being alive.拥有生活与仅仅活着。
J Med Ethics. 1984 Mar;10(1):5-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.1.5.
8
A 'Life-Style Choice' or a Philosophical Belief?: The Argument for Veganism and Vegetarianism to be a Protected Philosophical Belief and the Position in England and Wales.“生活方式的选择”还是一种哲学信仰?:将素食主义和纯素食主义视为受保护的哲学信仰的论据及英格兰和威尔士的立场
Liverp Law Rev. 2021;42(2):207-241. doi: 10.1007/s10991-020-09273-w. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
9
The pitfalls of qualified moral veganism. A critique of Jan Deckers' holistic health approach to animal ethics.合格道德素食主义的陷阱。对扬·德克斯整体健康动物伦理方法的批判。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Oct;23(5):1113-1117. doi: 10.1111/jep.12786. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
10
Human-Animal Chimeras, "Human" Cognitive Capacities, and Moral Status.人兽嵌合体、“人类”认知能力与道德地位。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2019 Sep;49(5):33-34. doi: 10.1002/hast.1052.

引用本文的文献

1
AI-Powered Analysis of Weight Loss Reports from Reddit: Unlocking Social Media's Potential in Dietary Assessment.基于人工智能的Reddit减肥报告分析:挖掘社交媒体在饮食评估中的潜力。
Nutrients. 2025 Feb 27;17(5):818. doi: 10.3390/nu17050818.
2
The Ethics of Veganism.纯素食主义的伦理道德
Cureus. 2024 Mar 15;16(3):e56214. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56214. eCollection 2024 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental impact of omnivorous, ovo-lacto-vegetarian, and vegan diet.杂食、蛋奶素食和纯素饮食的环境影响。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 21;7(1):6105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06466-8.
2
Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns.合理规划肉食摄入。“4N”原则。
Appetite. 2015 Aug;91:114-28. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
3
Sustainability of plant-based diets: back to the future.植物性饮食的可持续性:回到未来。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;100 Suppl 1:476S-82S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.071522. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
4
Nutritional update for physicians: plant-based diets.医生的营养更新:植物性饮食。
Perm J. 2013 Spring;17(2):61-6. doi: 10.7812/TPP/12-085.

素食主义、道德动机与虚假意识

Veganism, Moral Motivation and False Consciousness.

作者信息

Pickett Susana

机构信息

School of History, Politics and International Relations, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

J Agric Environ Ethics. 2021;34(3):15. doi: 10.1007/s10806-021-09857-0. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1007/s10806-021-09857-0
PMID:33897260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8058141/
Abstract

Despite the strength of arguments for veganism in the animal rights literature, alongside environmental and other anthropocentric concerns posed by industrialised animal agriculture, veganism remains only a minority standpoint. In this paper, I explore the moral motivational problem of veganism from the perspectives of moral psychology and political false consciousness. I argue that a novel interpretation of the post-Marxist notion of political false consciousness may help to make sense of the widespread refusal to shift towards veganism. Specifically, the notion of false consciousness fills some explanatory gaps left by the moral psychological notion of , often understood to refer to a weakness of will. Central to my approach is the idea that animal exploitation is largely systemic and the assumption that moral motivation is inseparable from moral thinking. In this light, the primary obstacle to the adoption of veganism arises not so much from a failure to put genuine beliefs into action, but rather in a shared, distorted way of thinking about animals. Thus, common unreflective objections to veganism may be said to be manifestations of false consciousness.

摘要

尽管动物权利文献中支持纯素主义的论据有力,且工业化动物农业引发了环境及其他以人类为中心的问题,但纯素主义仍然只是少数人的立场。在本文中,我从道德心理学和政治虚假意识的角度探讨纯素主义的道德动机问题。我认为,对后马克思主义政治虚假意识概念的一种新颖解释可能有助于理解为何普遍存在拒绝转向纯素主义的现象。具体而言,虚假意识概念填补了道德心理学中常被理解为意志薄弱的“[此处原文缺失相关概念]”概念所留下的一些解释空白。我的方法的核心观点是,动物剥削在很大程度上是系统性的,以及道德动机与道德思考不可分割的假设。据此,采用纯素主义的主要障碍与其说是未能将真正的信念付诸行动,不如说是存在一种关于动物的共同的、扭曲的思维方式。因此,可以说对纯素主义常见的不假思索的反对意见是虚假意识的表现。