• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Decreased complication profile and improved clinical outcomes of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty after 2010: A systematic review.2010年后初次反向全肩关节置换术并发症情况的改善及临床疗效的提高:一项系统评价
Shoulder Elbow. 2021 Apr;13(2):154-167. doi: 10.1177/1758573219852977. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
2
A Comparison and Correlation of Clinical Outcome Metrics in Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.解剖型与反置式全肩关节置换术临床结果指标的比较与相关性
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Dec;73 Suppl 1:S118-23.
3
The effect of body mass index on internal rotation and function following anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.体重指数对解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术后内旋和功能的影响。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Feb;30(2):265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
4
Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients 60 Years of Age or Younger: A Systematic Review.60岁及以下患者的反向全肩关节置换术的疗效:一项系统评价。
J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Mar;45(3):254.e1-254.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
5
Early results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using a patient-matched glenoid implant for severe glenoid bone deficiency.反向全肩关节置换术使用患者匹配型肩胛盂假体治疗严重肩胛盂骨缺损的早期结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7S):S139-S148. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.024.
6
Outcomes after shoulder replacement: comparison between reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.肩关节置换术后的结果:反向与解剖型全肩关节置换术的比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Feb;24(2):179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.039. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
7
Does Humeral Component Version Affect Range of Motion and Clinical Outcomes in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.肱骨假体旋转角度是否会影响反式全肩关节置换术的活动范围和临床疗效?一项系统评价。
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 8;10(24):5745. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245745.
8
Salvage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort analysis.解剖型全肩关节置换失败后的挽救性反式全肩关节置换:一项队列分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7S):S134-S138. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.013.
9
Effects of obesity on clinical and functional outcomes following anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.肥胖对解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术后临床和功能结果的影响。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jan;31(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
10
Using machine learning to predict clinical outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty with a minimal feature set.使用机器学习预测肩关节置换术后的临床结果,采用最小特征集。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 May;30(5):e225-e236. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.042. Epub 2020 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards optimal reverse total shoulder arthroplasty design: reconsidering the role of lateralized implants.迈向优化的反式全肩关节置换术设计:重新审视外偏植入物的作用。
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2024 Mar;27(1):1-2. doi: 10.5397/cise.2024.00045. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Aged Over 70 Without a Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.70岁以上无全层肩袖撕裂患者的解剖型全肩关节置换术与反式全肩关节置换术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast. 2023 Oct 6;7:24715492231206685. doi: 10.1177/24715492231206685. eCollection 2023.
3
Implant selection for successful reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.成功的反式全肩关节置换术的植入物选择
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Mar;26(1):93-106. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.01193. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
4
Dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using contemporary medialized modular systems. Can we still consider it such a frequent complication?使用现代中心化模块化系统行反式全肩关节置换术后的脱位。我们还能认为这是一种如此常见的并发症吗?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Dec;32(8):1525-1534. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03131-9. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Shoulder Arthroplasty Outcomes After Prior Non-Arthroplasty Shoulder Surgery.先前非关节置换肩部手术后的肩关节置换结果
JB JS Open Access. 2018 Aug 7;3(3):e0055. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.17.00055. eCollection 2018 Sep 25.
2
Grammont versus lateralizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: functional and radiographic outcomes.用于治疗肱骨近端骨折的Grammont手术与侧方反向全肩关节置换术:功能及影像学结果
Musculoskelet Surg. 2018 Oct;102(Suppl 1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s12306-018-0565-5. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
3
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty vs BIO-RSA: clinical and radiographic outcomes at short term follow-up.反向肩关节置换术与生物型反向肩关节置换术:短期随访的临床及影像学结果
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Oct 16;13(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0955-2.
4
Short-Term Results of the DePuy Global Unite Platform Shoulder System: A Two-Year Outcome Study.迪普伊全球统一平台肩部系统的短期结果:一项为期两年的结果研究。
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018 Sep;6(5):353-358.
5
Outcomes of Shoulder Arthroplasty Performed for Postinfectious Arthritis.感染后关节炎行肩关节置换术的疗效
Clin Orthop Surg. 2018 Sep;10(3):344-351. doi: 10.4055/cios.2018.10.3.344. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
6
Lateralization of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty decreases arm lengthening and demonstrates comparable risk of nerve injury compared with anatomic arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.反肩关节置换术中肱骨头的外侧化可减少手臂延长,并与解剖型关节置换术相比具有相当的神经损伤风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Oct;27(10):1845-1851. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
7
Early outcomes of locked noncemented stems for the management of proximal humeral fractures: a comparative study.锁定非骨水泥型柄治疗肱骨近端骨折的早期结果:一项对比研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jan;28(1):48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.05.036. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
8
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for type 1 sequelae of a fracture of the proximal humerus.肱骨近端骨折1型后遗症的反肩关节置换术。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Mar 1;100-B(3):318-323. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B3.BJJ-2017-0947.R1.
9
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using helical blade to optimize glenoid fixation and bone preservation: preliminary results in thirty five patients with minimum two year follow-up.使用螺旋刀片的反向全肩关节置换术以优化肩胛盂固定和骨保留:35例患者至少两年随访的初步结果
Int Orthop. 2018 Sep;42(9):2159-2164. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3891-1. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
10
Grammont humeral design versus onlay curved-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up.Graumont 肱骨柄设计与肱骨头置换翻修术的比较:最低 2 年随访的临床和影像学结果比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Apr;27(4):701-710. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.016. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

2010年后初次反向全肩关节置换术并发症情况的改善及临床疗效的提高:一项系统评价

Decreased complication profile and improved clinical outcomes of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty after 2010: A systematic review.

作者信息

Crum Raphael J, de Sa Darren L, Su Favian L, Lesniak Bryson P, Lin Albert

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Shoulder Elbow. 2021 Apr;13(2):154-167. doi: 10.1177/1758573219852977. Epub 2019 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1177/1758573219852977
PMID:33897847
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8039761/
Abstract

The purpose of this review was to update the complication profile of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) post-2010, given greater procedural familiarity, improved learning curves, enhanced implant designs, and increased attention to the nuances of patient selection. Three electronic databases were searched and screened in duplicate from 1 January 2010 to 16 December 2018 based on predetermined criteria. Twenty-two studies examining 1455 patients (26% male; mean age: 73.4 ± 3.6; mean follow-up: 23.4 ± 14.3 months) were reviewed. Post-operative motion ranged a mean 122.4° ± 11.5° flexion, 109° ± 19.4° abduction, and 33° ± 11.2°/41° ± 5° external/internal rotation. Post-operative mean Constant score was 58.9 ± 10.1, American Shoulder Elbow Surgeon score was 73.4 ± 6.1, Simple Shoulder Test score was 63.5 ± 6.5, and a Visual Analog Scale pain score was 1.6 ± 0.9. The overall complication rate was 18.2% and major complication rate was 15.4%. Compared to pre-2010, the overall complication rate of 18.2% is lower than previous rates of 19%-68%, with the rate of "major" complications dropping three-fold from 15.4% to 4.6%. The data suggest that rTSA is a safe and efficacious alternative to aTSA and HA, and the "stale" nature of previous complication profiles are points fundamental to perioperative discussions surrounding rTSA.

摘要

鉴于对手术操作更为熟悉、学习曲线得到改善、植入物设计得到改进以及对患者选择细微差别更加关注,本综述的目的是更新2010年后反式全肩关节置换术(rTSA)的并发症情况。基于预定标准,从2010年1月1日至2018年12月16日对三个电子数据库进行了重复检索和筛选。对22项研究进行了综述,这些研究共纳入1455例患者(男性占26%;平均年龄:73.4±3.6岁;平均随访时间:23.4±14.3个月)。术后活动范围平均为前屈122.4°±11.5°、外展109°±19.4°以及外旋/内旋33°±11.2°/41°±5°。术后平均Constant评分58.9±10.1、美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)评分73.4±6.1、简单肩关节测试(SST)评分63.5±6.5以及视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分为1.6±0.9。总体并发症发生率为18.2%,主要并发症发生率为15.4%。与2010年前相比,18.2%的总体并发症发生率低于先前19%-68%的发生率,“主要”并发症发生率从15.4%降至4.6%,下降了三倍。数据表明,rTSA是解剖型全肩关节置换术(aTSA)和半肩关节置换术(HA)的一种安全有效的替代方案,先前并发症情况的“过时”性质是围绕rTSA进行围手术期讨论的基本要点。