Bampidis Vasileios, Azimonti Giovanna, Bastos Maria de Lourdes, Christensen Henrik, Dusemund Birgit, Fašmon Durjava Mojca, Kouba Maryline, López-Alonso Marta, López Puente Secundino, Marcon Francesca, Mayo Baltasar, Pechová Alena, Petkova Mariana, Ramos Fernando, Sanz Yolanda, Villa Roberto Edoardo, Woutersen Ruud, Brozzi Rosella, Pettenati Elisa
EFSA J. 2021 Apr 19;19(4):e06520. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6520. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety of l-lysine monohydrochloride and l-lysine sulfate produced using CCTCC M 2015595 for all animal species. In 2019, the FEEDAP Panel issued an opinion on the safety and efficacy of the products. In that assessment, the Panel could not conclude on the safety of the additives for the target species, the consumers and the environment due to the uncertainties regarding the possible genetic modification of the strain used to obtain the production strain CCTCC M 2015595 and on the possible presence of viable cells and DNA of the production strain in the final products. Moreover, in the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel could not conclude on the safety of the additives for the users. The applicant provided supplementary data to characterise the strain from which the production strain under assessment was obtained. However, uncertainties remain on its origin and history of modification, including whether it has been genetically modified. The production strain CCTCC M 2015595 did not show the presence of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes nor of toxin and virulence factors genes. Moreover, as viable cells and DNA of the production strain were not detected in both final formulations, l-lysine HCl and l-lysine sulfate do not raise safety concerns as regards the production strain. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that l-lysine HCl and l-lysine sulfate produced by CCTCC M 2015595 are safe for the target species, consumers and for the environment. No additional data have been provided on the safety of the additives for users. Therefore, the conclusions from the Panel remained that in the absence of data, no conclusions on the safety of the additives for the user can be drawn.
应欧盟委员会要求,动物饲料添加剂及产品或物质专家小组(FEEDAP)被要求就使用中国典型培养物保藏中心M 2015595生产的L-盐酸赖氨酸和L-硫酸赖氨酸对所有动物物种的安全性发表科学意见。2019年,FEEDAP专家小组发布了关于这些产品安全性和有效性的意见。在该评估中,由于用于获得生产菌株中国典型培养物保藏中心M 2015595的菌株可能存在基因改造以及最终产品中可能存在生产菌株的活细胞和DNA方面存在不确定性,专家小组无法就添加剂对目标物种、消费者和环境的安全性得出结论。此外,由于缺乏数据,FEEDAP专家小组无法就添加剂对使用者的安全性得出结论。申请人提供了补充数据以表征获得所评估生产菌株的原始菌株。然而,其来源和改造历史,包括是否经过基因改造,仍存在不确定性。生产菌株中国典型培养物保藏中心M 2015595未显示存在获得性抗菌抗性基因、毒素和毒力因子基因。此外,在最终配方L-盐酸赖氨酸和L-硫酸赖氨酸中均未检测到生产菌株的活细胞和DNA,因此就生产菌株而言,L-盐酸赖氨酸和L-硫酸赖氨酸不存在安全问题。FEEDAP专家小组得出结论,中国典型培养物保藏中心M 2015595生产的L-盐酸赖氨酸和L-硫酸赖氨酸对目标物种、消费者和环境是安全的。未提供关于添加剂对使用者安全性的额外数据。因此,专家小组的结论仍然是,由于缺乏数据,无法就添加剂对使用者的安全性得出结论。