Suppr超能文献

下颌前牙牙龈退缩治疗中牙根覆盖的可预测性

Root Coverage Predictability in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions on Mandibular Anterior Teeth.

作者信息

Agusto M, Salman A, Parker D, Choi D, Schincaglia G P

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.

Division of Population Health Sciences, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, USA.

出版信息

JDR Clin Trans Res. 2022 Jul;7(3):224-233. doi: 10.1177/23800844211009437. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Mandibular anterior teeth are most frequently affected by gingival recession. However, data regarding mucogingival treatment aimed at root coverage in this specific location are limited.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the scientific literature and to use the meta-analytic approach to address the following focused question: "What is the effectiveness of different surgical approaches on clinical and patient-related outcomes in the treatment of buccal gingival recessions on mandibular anterior teeth?"

METHODS

Studies were located by searching 3 electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases) and cross-referencing. Randomized and nonrandomized studies including at least 1 arm involving the use of pedicle flaps and/or free soft tissue grafts in the treatment of gingival recessions (recession type [RT] 1 and RT2) located on the buccal aspects of mandibular centrals, laterals and canines, were included in the analysis. Primary outcome was mean root coverage (mRC), expressed in percentage, based on a 3- to 12-mo follow-up observation. A Bayesian single-arm network meta-analysis was performed to identify a treatment hierarchy of the different surgical techniques.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies, with a total of 23 arms, were included in the quantitative analysis. The greatest mRC is associated with laterally positioned flap (LPF) + connective tissue graft (CTG) (91.2%) and tunnel (TUN) + CTG (89.4%), whereas LPF alone, coronally advanced flap (CAF) + CTG, and free gingival graft (FGG) showed lower mRC (79.1%, 78.9%, and 68.5% respectively). TUN + CTG provides significantly greater mRC compared to CAF+CTG. No difference among the procedures could be observed in terms of keratinized tissue width gain.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment hierarchy generated by an arm-based network meta-analysis model suggested that tunnel and laterally positioned flap, both in combination with connective tissue graft, may provide the greatest mean root coverage in the treatment of mandibular anterior recessions.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT

The results of the present systematic review can be used by clinicians when deciding which approach to adopt when treating buccal gingival recessions on mandibular anterior teeth. In particular, procedures based on a laterally positioned flap or a tunneling technique, both in combination with connective tissue graft, seem to be the most predictable therapeutic decision.

摘要

引言

下颌前牙最常受到牙龈退缩的影响。然而,针对该特定部位进行牙根覆盖的黏膜牙龈治疗的数据有限。

目的

本研究的目的是系统回顾科学文献,并采用荟萃分析方法来解决以下重点问题:“不同手术方法在下颌前牙颊侧牙龈退缩治疗中对临床和患者相关结局的有效性如何?”

方法

通过检索3个电子数据库(Medline、Scopus和Cochrane数据库)并交叉引用进行文献查找。纳入分析的随机和非随机研究至少有1个臂涉及使用蒂瓣和/或游离软组织移植治疗位于下颌中切牙、侧切牙和尖牙颊侧的牙龈退缩(退缩类型[RT]1和RT2)。主要结局是基于3至12个月随访观察的平均牙根覆盖(mRC),以百分比表示。进行了贝叶斯单臂网络荟萃分析以确定不同手术技术的治疗层次。

结果

16项研究,共23个臂,纳入了定量分析。最大的mRC与侧向转位瓣(LPF)+结缔组织移植(CTG)(91.2%)和隧道瓣(TUN)+CTG(89.4%)相关,而单独的LPF、冠向推进瓣(CAF)+CTG和游离牙龈移植(FGG)的mRC较低(分别为79.1%、78.9%和68.5%)。与CAF+CTG相比,TUN+CTG提供的mRC显著更高。在角化组织宽度增加方面,各手术方法之间未观察到差异。

结论

基于臂的网络荟萃分析模型产生的治疗层次表明,隧道瓣和侧向转位瓣与结缔组织移植联合使用,在下颌前牙牙龈退缩治疗中可能提供最大的平均牙根覆盖。

知识转化声明

本系统评价的结果可供临床医生在决定治疗下颌前牙颊侧牙龈退缩采用何种方法时使用。特别是,基于侧向转位瓣或隧道技术并与结缔组织移植联合使用的手术方法似乎是最可预测的治疗决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验