• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解析机制中的分辨率提升。

Increasing resolution in the mechanisms of resolve.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge,

The University of Sydney, School of Psychology and Brain and Mind Centre, Sydney, NSW2050, Australia.

出版信息

Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 26;44:e34. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X20000801.

DOI:10.1017/S0140525X20000801
PMID:33899709
Abstract

Ainslie offers an encompassing and compelling account of willpower, although his big-picture view comes occasionally at the cost of low resolution. We comment on ambiguity in the metacognitive and prospective mechanisms of resolve implicated in recursive self-prediction. We hope to show both the necessity and promise of specifying testable cognitive mechanisms of willpower.

摘要

安斯利对意志力进行了全面而引人入胜的论述,尽管他的整体观点有时会牺牲低分辨率。我们评论了递归自我预测中涉及的元认知和预期解决机制的模糊性。我们希望展示意志力的可测试认知机制的必要性和前景。

相似文献

1
Increasing resolution in the mechanisms of resolve.解析机制中的分辨率提升。
Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 26;44:e34. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X20000801.
2
Insight across mental disorders: A multifaceted metacognitive phenomenon.洞察精神障碍:一种多方面的元认知现象。
Psychiatriki. 2019 Jan-Mar;30(1):13-16. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2019.301.13.
3
Why Metacognition Is Not Always Helpful.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 2;11:1537. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01537. eCollection 2020.
4
Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.元认知判断背后的特定领域和一般领域过程。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Mar;49:264-277. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
5
The Role of Metacognitive Components in Creative Thinking.元认知成分在创造性思维中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 24;10:2404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02404. eCollection 2019.
6
Metacognition - What did James H. Flavell really say and the implications for the conceptualization and design of metacognitive interventions.元认知——詹姆斯·H·弗拉维尔究竟说了什么,以及对元认知干预的概念化和设计的影响。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Nov;201:20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
7
Metacognitive knowledge and experience in recently diagnosed patients with bipolar disorder.近期诊断的双相情感障碍患者的元认知知识与体验
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016 Sep;38(7):730-44. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1161733. Epub 2016 May 4.
8
[Characteristics and impact of metacognitive deficits in schizophrenia].[精神分裂症元认知缺陷的特征及影响]
Encephale. 2013 Apr;39(2):123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.01.009. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
9
[The concept and characteristics of metacognition and its role in schizophrenia].[元认知的概念、特征及其在精神分裂症中的作用]
Psychiatr Hung. 2020;35(4):423-434.
10
Assessing metacognition during or after basic-level and high-level cognitive tasks? A comparative study in a non-clinical sample.在基础认知任务或高级认知任务期间或之后评估元认知?一项非临床样本的比较研究。
Encephale. 2020 Feb;46(1):3-6. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 Jun 19.