Mittal Samarth, Ifthekar Syed, Ahuja Kaustubh, Sarkar Bhaskar, Singh Gobinder, Rana Arvind, Kandwal Pankaj
Department of Orthopaedics, AIIMS Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Department of Trauma and Emergency, AIIMS Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):55-61. doi: 10.14444/8006. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
BACKGROUND: Long-segment posterior fixation has been used as a mainstay treatment of spine fracture-dislocations. Studies using short-segment posterior fixation in cases of thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation are limited. We describe our experience of 26 patients with thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation treated by short-segment or long-segment posterior spinal fixation and fusion. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study of 26 patients with thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation treated by long-segment (group 1, n = 12) and short-segment posterior instrumentation (group 2, n = 14). Clinical (visual analog scale [VAS], Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), neurological (American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] scale), radiological (kyphotic angle, translational percentage, and displacement angle), and surgical (blood loss, operative time) outcomes and complications were recorded with each method. The mean follow-up period was 8.64 months (6-20 months). RESULTS: The mean duration of surgery was 3.92 ± 0.67 hours in group 1 and 3.21 ± 0.54 hours in group 2, and mean blood loss was 583.33 ± 111.5 mL and 478.6 ±112.2 mL in groups 1 and 2, respectively ( < .05). There was no radiologically visible pseudarthrosis, implant failure, or screw breakage in either group at follow up with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to the radiological outcome ( > .05). Two patients in group 1 and 6 patients in group 2 improved after surgery at least 1 ASIA grade. VAS and ODI improved in both groups at the final follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Short-segment fixation can be used for treating fracture-dislocation patients, as it results in less blood loss, decreased intraoperative time, and saves fusion segments with similar radiological and clinical outcomes as long-segment fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
背景:长节段后路固定一直是脊柱骨折脱位的主要治疗方法。关于胸腰椎骨折脱位采用短节段后路固定的研究有限。我们描述了26例胸腰椎骨折脱位患者接受短节段或长节段后路脊柱固定融合治疗的经验。 方法:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入26例接受长节段(第1组,n = 12)和短节段后路内固定(第2组,n = 14)治疗的胸腰椎骨折脱位患者。记录每种方法的临床(视觉模拟评分法[VAS]、奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数[ODI])、神经学(美国脊髓损伤协会[ASIA]分级)、放射学(后凸角、平移百分比和移位角)、手术(失血量、手术时间)结果及并发症。平均随访时间为8.64个月(6 - 20个月)。 结果:第1组平均手术时间为3.92±0.67小时,第2组为3.21±0.54小时;第1组和第2组平均失血量分别为583.33±111.5 mL和478.6±112.2 mL(P<0.05)。随访时两组均无放射学可见的假关节形成、内固定失败或螺钉断裂,两组放射学结果无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。第1组2例患者和第2组6例患者术后ASIA分级至少提高1级。两组在末次随访时VAS和ODI均有改善。 结论:短节段固定可用于治疗骨折脱位患者,因为它能减少失血量、缩短手术时间,并保留融合节段,其放射学和临床结果与长节段固定相似。 证据级别:3级。
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016-9-8
Chang Gung Med J. 2002-4
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2025
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024-4-15
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023-9-18
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013-12
Eur Spine J. 2009-10-23
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009-8
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007-6-15
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006-5-15