Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpenerstrasse. 62 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpenerstrasse. 62 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;38:101505. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.11.019. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
Radical lymphadenectomy is crucial in operations for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Usually pN1 and pN2 lymph nodes are affected consecutively (N1N2). Nevertheless, pN2 metastases may also occur in the absence of pN1 as skip-N2 metastases (N0N2). Here we compare the long-term survival of N1N2- and N0N2 patients.
464 patients underwent surgery for NSCLC at our institution between 2012 and 2017. We retrospectively reviewed data of pN2 stage patients (n = 68). Patients with N1N2 (n = 39) were compared to N0N2 (n = 29) patients. 1-, 3-and 5-year survival rates were measured. Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and the cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors for overall survival. All patients received adjuvant chemoradiation therapy according to European guidelines.
The baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. We observed no differences in the histology, localization, or gender in our cohort. N0N2 patients showed significantly better 1- (N1N2: 82.4% vs. N0N2 100%; p = 0.001), 3- (14.7% vs. 63.6%; p=<0.001) and 5-year (9.4% vs. 43.8%; p = 0.001) survival rates. Tumor size (Hazard ratio (HR) 1.46, Confidence interval (CI 95%) 1.03-2.04; p = 0.03) and the occurrence of N1N2 (HR 4.26, CI 2.04-8.91; p < 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors for worse long-term survival. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed a reduced overall survival for N1N2 patients (log-rank N1N2, N0N2 p < 0.0001).
N1N2 patients have a significantly worse prognosis compared to N0N2 patients. This will aid to classify the heterogeneous pN2-NSCLC patient population more precisely. Further, multimodal therapy should be considered for N1N2 patients.
在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的手术中,根治性淋巴结清扫至关重要。通常情况下,pN1 和 pN2 淋巴结依次受累(N1N2)。然而,pN2 转移也可能发生在没有 pN1 的情况下,即跳跃性 N2 转移(N0N2)。在此,我们比较了 N1N2 和 N0N2 患者的长期生存情况。
2012 年至 2017 年,我们机构对 464 例 NSCLC 患者进行了手术。我们回顾性分析了 pN2 期患者的数据(n=68)。将 N1N2 患者(n=39)与 N0N2 患者(n=29)进行比较。测量 1 年、3 年和 5 年生存率。采用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线评估生存情况,并采用 Cox 比例风险模型确定总生存的预后因素。所有患者均根据欧洲指南接受辅助放化疗。
两组患者的基线特征无差异。我们观察到在组织学、定位或性别方面,两组之间没有差异。N0N2 患者的 1 年(N1N2:82.4%比 N0N2:100%;p=0.001)、3 年(14.7%比 63.6%;p<0.001)和 5 年(9.4%比 43.8%;p=0.001)生存率明显更高。肿瘤大小(风险比(HR)1.46,置信区间(CI 95%)1.03-2.04;p=0.03)和 N1N2 的发生(HR 4.26,CI 2.04-8.91;p<0.0001)是影响长期生存的独立预后因素。Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示 N1N2 患者的总生存时间明显缩短(对数秩 N1N2,N0N2 p<0.0001)。
与 N0N2 患者相比,N1N2 患者的预后明显更差。这将有助于更精确地对异质性 pN2-NCLC 患者群体进行分类。此外,应考虑对 N1N2 患者进行多模式治疗。