School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, King George VI Building, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 7RU, UK.
School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, King George VI Building, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 7RU, UK.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Jan;18(1):2193-2199. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.010. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
Qualitative research is a well-established branch of scientific enquiry that draws insights from experiences.Within social and administrative pharmacy research, interview and focus group methods are a mainstay of collecting data. However, other disciplines such as sociology, psychology and anthropology, use existing data that is routinely to provide a substance for qualitative inquiry. Drawing on our experiences of using interdisciplinary research methods, this paper presents three case studies where textual data was qualitatively analysed and critically examines the strengths and weaknesses of these method in relation to pharmacy practice.
Three case studies were selected that access different types of existing, routinely collected data from pharmacy practice. This included 1) a study utilising boardroom meeting minutes, 2) a study using incident reports and 3) a study using WhatsApp messages as data. Each case study is described and critically examined. The strengths and weaknesses of this approach are based on our own reflections of completing the studies.
Relationships between people, products and organisations can be examined in documents, records and text that is routinely collected. Existing data can also provide insights into culture, working patterns, education and errors. Practical advantages of using existing data include faster data collection and access to first-hand, accounts of experiences of human relationship with pharmaceutical products and practice. Drawbacks of using existing data are that some data may be missing, participants may no longer be accessible for participant checking and the context of language may have changed.
This paper critically examined the use of methods rarely used in pharmacy practice research which draw on existing, routinely collected data. Adopting a wider range of data collection methods may will provide new understanding and insights into social and clinical pharmacy practice.
定性研究是科学探究的一个成熟分支,它从经验中汲取见解。在社会和行政药学研究中,访谈和焦点小组方法是收集数据的主要方法。然而,社会学、心理学和人类学等其他学科则使用常规提供定性探究素材的现有数据。本文借鉴我们使用跨学科研究方法的经验,提出了三个案例研究,对这些方法进行了定性分析,并批判性地考察了它们在与药学实践相关方面的优缺点。
选择了三个案例研究,这些研究都从药学实践中获取了不同类型的常规收集的数据。这包括 1)一项利用董事会会议记录的研究,2)一项利用事件报告的研究,3)一项利用 WhatsApp 消息作为数据的研究。每个案例研究都进行了描述和批判性分析。这种方法的优缺点是基于我们自己对完成这些研究的反思。
可以在常规收集的文件、记录和文本中研究人与产品和组织之间的关系。现有数据还可以提供有关文化、工作模式、教育和错误的见解。使用现有数据的实际优势包括更快的数据收集以及可以直接获取与药物产品和实践相关的人际关系经验的记录。使用现有数据的缺点是,某些数据可能缺失,参与者可能不再可供参与者核对,语言的上下文可能已经发生变化。
本文批判性地考察了在药学实践研究中很少使用的方法,这些方法利用了常规收集的数据。采用更广泛的数据收集方法可能会为社会和临床药学实践提供新的理解和见解。