Suppr超能文献

[憩室病手术方式的选择:考虑最新治疗策略]

[Choice of operative procedure in diverticular disease : Taking the latest treatment strategies into consideration].

作者信息

Betzler A, Grün J, Finze A, Reißfelder C

机构信息

Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.

出版信息

Chirurg. 2021 Aug;92(8):702-706. doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01409-6. Epub 2021 Apr 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are various procedures to be considered in the surgical treatment of complicated diverticulitis, which must be selected depending on the classification of diverticular disease (CDD) type and the condition of the patient.

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of surgical procedures with respect to aspects such as morbidity, mortality, reconstructive surgery and postoperative quality of life.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Evaluation, analysis and assessment of the current literature on surgical treatment of diverticular disease.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis is now considered the standard procedure for complicated sigmoid diverticulitis. It is preferable to open resection because of the better results of the minimally invasive approach with respect to the incidence of wound infections, abdominal abscesses and the occurrence of fascial dehiscence. In an emergency situation with perforation and peritonitis (CDD type 2c1/2), primary anastomosis with protective ileostomy should be favored over discontinuity resection (Hartmann's procedure). In particular, it must be taken into account that in a large proportion of patients there is no restoration of continuity after Hartmann's operation. The damage control strategy can be used in perforated sigmoid diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis (CDD type 2c1/2). In individual cases, laparoscopic lavage with insertion of a drainage may be considered as a therapeutic treatment strategy for perforated sigmoid diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis (CDD type 2c1).

CONCLUSION

Selection of the surgical procedure for complicated sigmoid diverticulitis remains challenging. Randomized controlled trials of new treatment strategies as well as robotic-assisted surgery should be considered in the choice of surgical procedure in the future.

摘要

背景

复杂憩室炎的外科治疗有多种手术方式可供考虑,必须根据憩室病(CDD)类型分类和患者情况进行选择。

目的

比较手术方式在发病率、死亡率、重建手术和术后生活质量等方面的差异。

材料与方法

对当前有关憩室病外科治疗的文献进行评估、分析和评价。

结果

腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术并一期吻合术目前被认为是复杂乙状结肠憩室炎的标准术式。由于微创方法在伤口感染、腹腔脓肿发生率及筋膜裂开发生情况方面效果更好,因此优于开放切除术。在穿孔并伴有腹膜炎的紧急情况(CDD 2c1/2型)下,应首选带保护性回肠造口术的一期吻合术,而非间断性切除术(哈特曼手术)。尤其必须考虑到,在很大一部分患者中,哈特曼手术后无法恢复肠道连续性。损伤控制策略可用于伴有弥漫性腹膜炎的穿孔乙状结肠憩室炎(CDD 2c1/2型)。在个别情况下,对于伴有脓性腹膜炎的穿孔乙状结肠憩室炎(CDD 2c1型),可考虑采用插入引流管的腹腔镜灌洗作为一种治疗策略。

结论

复杂乙状结肠憩室炎手术方式的选择仍然具有挑战性。未来在选择手术方式时,应考虑新治疗策略以及机器人辅助手术的随机对照试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验