• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联合检测血浆肿瘤坏死因子-α转化酶和 Notch1 有助于筛查腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术后内漏。

Combined Detection of Plasma Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Converting Enzyme and Notch1 is Valuable in Screening Endoleak After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Repair.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Department of Thyroid and Vascular Surgery, Qingdao Eighth People's Hospital, Qingdao, China.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:302-308. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.03.041. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2021.03.041
PMID:33905845
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Endoleaks may be present in up to 25% of patients after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) and there is no clear consensus on valuable biomarkers to determine endoleak presence. The aim of this study was to examine the potential value of plasma tumor necrosis factor-α converting enzyme (TACE) and Notch1 concentrations in determining endoleak presence after EVAR.

METHODS

A total of 110 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm who underwent EVAR were enrolled in our study, and plasma TACE and Notch1 concentrations were measured prior to and 6 months after EVAR. Logistic regression was performed to assess the association of postoperative plasma TACE and Notch1 concentrations with endoleak after adjusting for potential confounders. The ability of plasma TACE and Notch1 concentrations to determine endoleak presence was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients developed endoleaks 6 months after EVAR. Both postoperative plasma TACE and Notch1 concentrations were higher in patients with endoleak than in those without endoleak (2376.4 ± 28.1 pg/ml vs. 2094.1 ± 27.3 pg/ml, P < 0.01; 218.6 ± 1.9 pg/ml vs. 195.0 ± 2.1 pg/ml, P < 0.01, respectively). The AUCs from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of plasma TACE and Notch1 concentrations in determining endoleak presence were 0.844 (95% CI 0.771 to 0.918, P < 0.01) and 0.860 (95% CI 0.791 to 0.930, P < 0.01), respectively. Combining the detection of plasma Notch1 and TACE concentrations could improve the accuracy in determining endoleak presence (AUC 0.930, 95% CI 0.883 to 0.978, P < 0.01). The predicted probability cutoff of 0.22 yielded a sensitivity of 95.8% and a specificity of 82.6% for endoleak presence.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma TACE and Notch1 levels can discriminate patients with and without endoleak 6 months after EVAR, and have a potential role in screening patients requiring computed tomography angiography.

摘要

目的

血管内腹主动脉瘤修复(EVAR)后,多达 25%的患者可能存在内漏,目前尚无明确共识认为哪种生物标志物具有价值,能够确定内漏的存在。本研究旨在探讨血浆肿瘤坏死因子-α转化酶(TACE)和 Notch1 浓度在确定 EVAR 后内漏存在的潜在价值。

方法

共纳入 110 例接受 EVAR 的腹主动脉瘤患者,在 EVAR 前后测量血浆 TACE 和 Notch1 浓度。采用逻辑回归分析,调整潜在混杂因素后,评估术后血浆 TACE 和 Notch1 浓度与 EVAR 后内漏的关系。采用受试者工作特征曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)评估血浆 TACE 和 Notch1 浓度确定内漏存在的能力。

结果

EVAR 后 6 个月,24 例患者发生内漏。与无内漏患者相比,有内漏患者术后血浆 TACE 和 Notch1 浓度更高(2376.4±28.1 pg/ml 比 2094.1±27.3 pg/ml,P<0.01;218.6±1.9 pg/ml 比 195.0±2.1 pg/ml,P<0.01)。血浆 TACE 和 Notch1 浓度判断内漏存在的受试者工作特征曲线分析 AUC 分别为 0.844(95%CI 0.771 至 0.918,P<0.01)和 0.860(95%CI 0.791 至 0.930,P<0.01)。联合检测血浆 Notch1 和 TACE 浓度可提高判断内漏存在的准确性(AUC 0.930,95%CI 0.883 至 0.978,P<0.01)。预测概率截断值为 0.22 时,内漏存在的敏感性为 95.8%,特异性为 82.6%。

结论

EVAR 后 6 个月,血浆 TACE 和 Notch1 水平可区分有内漏和无内漏患者,对 CT 血管造影有潜在的筛查作用。

相似文献

1
Combined Detection of Plasma Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Converting Enzyme and Notch1 is Valuable in Screening Endoleak After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Repair.联合检测血浆肿瘤坏死因子-α转化酶和 Notch1 有助于筛查腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术后内漏。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:302-308. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.03.041. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
2
Circulating biomarkers are not associated with endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.循环生物标志物与腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术后的内漏无关。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Mar;67(3):770-777. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.090. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
3
Correlation of Baseline Plasma and Inguinal Connective Tissue Metalloproteinases and Their Inhibitors With Late High-Pressure Endoleak After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Long-term Results.血管内动脉瘤修复术后晚期高压内漏与基线血浆及腹股沟结缔组织金属蛋白酶及其抑制剂的相关性:长期结果。
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Dec;26(6):826-835. doi: 10.1177/1526602819871963. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
4
A Statistical Shape Model of Infrarenal Aortic Necks in Patients With and Without Late Type Ia Endoleak After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.肾下型主动脉瘤腔内修复术后伴有和不伴有迟发ⅠA型内漏患者的统计形态学模型。
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Oct;31(5):882-891. doi: 10.1177/15266028221149913. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
5
Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Predicts and Detects Complications After Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描预测和检测腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术后的并发症。
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Aug;26(4):520-528. doi: 10.1177/1526602819849088. Epub 2019 May 10.
6
Combining detection of Notch1 and tumor necrosis factor-α converting enzyme is a reliable biomarker for the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms.联合检测Notch1和肿瘤坏死因子-α转换酶是诊断腹主动脉瘤的可靠生物标志物。
Life Sci. 2015 Apr 15;127:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
7
Application of color-coded quantitative digital subtraction angiography in predicting the outcomes of immediate type I and type III endoleaks.
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Sep;66(3):760-767. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.048. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
8
Predictive Models of Complications after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.血管内主动脉瘤修复术后并发症的预测模型
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Apr;40:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.08.020. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
9
A prospective study of carbon dioxide digital subtraction versus standard contrast arteriography in the detection of endoleaks in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs.一项关于二氧化碳数字减影与标准对比动脉造影术在血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术中检测内漏的前瞻性研究。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Jan;27(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.10.001.
10
Outcome-based anatomic criteria for defining the hostile aortic neck.基于结果的用于定义主动脉颈部不良的解剖学标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jun;61(6):1383-90.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.12.063. Epub 2015 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of endovascular repair versus open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a comparative study.血管内修复术与开放手术治疗破裂性腹主动脉瘤的疗效和安全性:一项对比研究。
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 Mar 15;15(3):1234-1247. doi: 10.62347/NYJT8307. eCollection 2025.
2
Biomarkers in EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications.血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)与腹主动脉瘤中的生物标志物:病理生理学及临床意义
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 13;12(1):183. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010183.