Suppr超能文献

儿童造血干细胞移植患者使用 Hickman 导管行异位与同部位挽救性治疗的比较研究。

Replacement Versus Same-Site Salvage Using Hickman Catheter for Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation Patients: A Comparative Study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of medicine, Umm Al-Qura University at Makkah, Makkah, Saudi Arabia; Department of Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, KSA, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Department of Pediatric Surgery, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:443-448. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.03.039. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children undergoing bone marrow transplant need a double-lumen Hickman line. Therefore, changing Port-a-Cath ports to double-lumen Hickman catheter is mandatory. Several methods were described for changing Port-a-Cath ports either through the same-site or a new placement access site. The advantage of one method over the other is still debatable. We conducted this study to compare the safety and effectiveness of replacement versus salvage techniques to change ports to the Hickman lines before bone marrow transplants in pediatric patients.

METHODS

We included 85 pediatric patients who underwent stem cell transplants. Their age ranged from 0.2 to 15 years. According to the Hickman reinsertion technique, we classified the patients into 2 groups; the Replacement group (n = 47) and the Same-site salvage group (n = 38). We compared the data before and after Hickman insertion between both groups. Study outcomes were the catheter duration, its complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

The mean age of all patients was 4.7 ± 3.9 years, and 65.9% were males. There was no difference in the baseline data between both groups. During Port-a- Cath first insertion; 16.5% of patients suffered complications, with 10.6% had conversion to cut down, 1.2% had a hematoma, and 4.7% had multiple site insertion. We did not report differences between groups in the complications of the first port insertion. The Hickman duration was longer in the replacement group (4 (Q1-Q2: 2-6) vs. 1 (0.5-3) months, P = 0.005). Increased age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.31, P = 0.001) and male gender (OR: 1.19, P = 0.046) were independent predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular same-site salvage technique could help preserve vascular access during the tunnel catheter exchange for noninfectious reasons. We recommend the use of the same-site salvage technique in pediatric transplant patients.

摘要

背景

骨髓移植患儿需要双腔 Hickman 导管。因此,将 Port-a-Cath 端口更改为双腔 Hickman 导管是强制性的。已经描述了几种通过同一部位或新的放置通道部位来改变 Port-a-Cath 端口的方法。一种方法相对于另一种方法的优势仍然存在争议。我们进行这项研究是为了比较在儿科患者进行骨髓移植之前,将端口更换为 Hickman 导管时,更换与抢救技术的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们纳入了 85 名接受干细胞移植的儿科患者。他们的年龄从 0.2 岁到 15 岁不等。根据 Hickman 重新插入技术,我们将患者分为 2 组;更换组(n=47)和同部位抢救组(n=38)。我们比较了两组之间 Hickman 插入前后的数据。研究结果是导管持续时间、并发症和死亡率。

结果

所有患者的平均年龄为 4.7±3.9 岁,65.9%为男性。两组患者的基线数据无差异。在 Port-a-Cath 首次插入期间;16.5%的患者发生并发症,其中 10.6%的患者需要转为切开,1.2%的患者出现血肿,4.7%的患者出现多处插入。我们没有报告两组在首次端口插入的并发症方面存在差异。更换组的 Hickman 持续时间较长(4(Q1-Q2:2-6)与 1(0.5-3)个月,P=0.005)。年龄增加(比值比[OR]:1.31,P=0.001)和男性(OR:1.19,P=0.046)是死亡的独立预测因素。

结论

血管内同部位抢救技术可在非感染性隧道导管交换期间帮助保留血管通路。我们建议在儿科移植患者中使用同部位抢救技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验