Suppr超能文献

基于家庭的健康、营养和响应性刺激干预以及有条件现金转移对儿童发育和生长的影响:坦桑尼亚的一项群组随机对照试验

Effect of a home-based health, nutrition and responsive stimulation intervention and conditional cash transfers on child development and growth: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in Tanzania.

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Apr;6(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005086.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Evidence on the effects of community health worker (CHW) interventions and conditional cash transfers (CCTs) on child growth and development in sub-Saharan Africa remains sparse.

METHODS

We conducted a single-blind, cluster-randomised controlled trial of an integrated home-visiting health, nutrition and responsive stimulation intervention alone and in combination with CCTs to promote antenatal and child clinic attendance from 2017 to 2019 in rural Morogoro Region, Tanzania. Pregnant women and caregivers with a child <1 year of age were enrolled. Twelve villages were randomised to either (1) CHW (n=200 participants), (2) CHW+CCT (n=200) or (3) control (n=193). An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted for the primary trial outcomes of child cognitive, language and motor development assessed with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development and child length/height-for-age z-scores (HAZ) at 18 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

The CHW and CHW+CCT interventions had beneficial effects on child cognitive development as compared with control (standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.24, and SMD: 0.18, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.28, respectively). The CHW+CCT intervention also had positive effects on language (SMD: 0.08, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.15) and motor (SMD: 0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.28) development. Both CHW and CHW+CCT interventions had no effect on HAZ in the primary analysis; however, there were statistically significant positive effects in multivariable analyses. The CHW+CCT group (mean difference: 3.0 visits, 95% CI 2.1 to 4.0) and the CHW group (mean difference: 1.5 visits, 95% CI 0.6 to 2.5) attended greater number of child health and growth monitoring clinic visits as compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

Integrated CHW home-visiting interventions can improve child cognitive development and may have positive effects on linear growth. Combining CHW with CCT may provide additional benefits on clinic visit attendance and selected child development outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN10323949.

摘要

简介

关于社区卫生工作者(CHW)干预措施和条件性现金转移(CCT)对撒哈拉以南非洲儿童生长发育影响的证据仍然很少。

方法

我们于 2017 年至 2019 年在坦桑尼亚莫罗戈罗地区开展了一项单独的、基于群组的、随机对照试验,评估了一种综合家访健康、营养和反应性刺激干预措施单独以及与 CCT 联合使用对促进产前和儿童诊所就诊的效果。招募了怀孕妇女和有 1 岁以下儿童的照顾者。将 12 个村庄随机分为(1)CHW(n=200 名参与者)、(2)CHW+CCT(n=200)或(3)对照组(n=193)。主要试验结局为 18 个月随访时采用贝利婴幼儿发育量表评估的儿童认知、语言和运动发育情况,以及儿童长度/身高年龄 z 分数(HAZ)。

结果

与对照组相比,CHW 和 CHW+CCT 干预措施对儿童认知发展有有益影响(标准化均数差(SMD):0.15,95%CI 0.05 至 0.24,和 SMD:0.18,95%CI 0.07 至 0.28)。CHW+CCT 干预措施对语言(SMD:0.08,95%CI 0.01 至 0.15)和运动(SMD:0.16,95%CI 0.03 至 0.28)发育也有积极影响。在主要分析中,CHW 和 CHW+CCT 干预措施对 HAZ 均无影响;然而,在多变量分析中存在统计学上显著的积极影响。与对照组相比,CHW+CCT 组(平均差异:3.0 次就诊,95%CI 2.1 至 4.0)和 CHW 组(平均差异:1.5 次就诊,95%CI 0.6 至 2.5)接受了更多的儿童健康和生长监测诊所就诊。

结论

综合 CHW 家访干预措施可以改善儿童认知发育,并且可能对线性生长有积极影响。将 CHW 与 CCT 结合使用可能会对就诊次数和部分儿童发育结果产生额外的益处。

试验注册号

ISRCTN8631440。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8342/8088247/f95112cf2e28/bmjgh-2021-005086f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验