• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何使性传播感染和血源性病原体的自我采样包更具包容性?一项针对轻度学习障碍和低健康素养人群的定性研究。

How can we make self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infections and bloodborne viruses more inclusive? A qualitative study with people with mild learning disabilities and low health literacy.

机构信息

Nursing & Community Health, School of Health 7 ife Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK

Glasgow Caledonian University, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Sex Transm Infect. 2021 Jun;97(4):276-281. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2020-054869. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1136/sextrans-2020-054869
PMID:33906976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8165145/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

1.5 million people in the UK have mild to moderate learning disabilities. STIs and bloodborne viruses (BBVs) are over-represented in people experiencing broader health inequalities, which include those with mild learning disabilities. Self-managed care, including self-sampling for STIs/BBVs, is increasingly commonplace, requiring agency and health literacy. To inform the development of a partner notification trial, we explored barriers and facilitators to correct use of an STI/BBV self-sampling pack among people with mild learning disabilities.

METHODS

Using purposive and convenience sampling we conducted four interviews and five gender-specific focus groups with 25 people (13 women, 12 men) with mild learning disabilities (July-August 2018) in Scotland. We balanced deductive and inductive thematic analyses of audio transcripts to explore issues associated with barriers and facilitators to correct use of the pack.

RESULTS

All participants found at least one element of the pack challenging or impossible, but welcomed the opportunity to undertake sexual health screening without attending a clinic and welcomed the inclusion of condoms. Reported barriers to correct use included perceived overly complex STI/BBV information and instructions, feeling overwhelmed and the manual dexterity required for blood sampling. Many women struggled interpreting anatomical diagrams depicting vulvovaginal self-swabbing. Facilitators included pre-existing STI/BBV knowledge, familiarity with self-management, good social support and knowing that the service afforded privacy.

CONCLUSION

In the first study to explore the usability of self-sampling packs for STI/BBV in people with learning disabilities, participants found it challenging to use the pack. Limiting information to the minimum required to inform decision-making, 'easy read' formats, simple language, large font sizes and simpler diagrams could improve acceptability. However, some people will remain unable to engage with self-sampling at all. To avoid widening health inequalities, face-to-face options should continue to be provided for those unable or unwilling to engage with self-managed care.

摘要

目的

英国有 150 万人患有轻度至中度学习障碍。性传播感染(STIs)和血源性病原体(BBVs)在经历更广泛健康不平等的人群中更为常见,其中包括那些患有轻度学习障碍的人。自我管理护理,包括自我 STI/BBV 采样,越来越普遍,需要机构和健康素养。为了为伙伴通知试验的开展提供信息,我们探讨了轻度学习障碍者正确使用 STI/BBV 自我采样包的障碍和促进因素。

方法

使用目的性和便利性抽样,我们在 2018 年 7 月至 8 月在苏格兰对 25 名(13 名女性,12 名男性)轻度学习障碍者进行了 4 次访谈和 5 次性别特定焦点小组讨论。我们对音频记录进行了演绎和归纳主题分析,以探讨与正确使用套件相关的障碍和促进因素。

结果

所有参与者都发现套件的至少一个元素具有挑战性或不可能,但他们欢迎有机会在不前往诊所的情况下进行性健康筛查,并欢迎包含避孕套。正确使用的障碍包括感知到的过于复杂的 STI/BBV 信息和说明、感到不知所措以及采血所需的手的灵巧度。许多女性在解释描绘阴道自我采样的解剖图时遇到困难。促进因素包括现有的 STI/BBV 知识、对自我管理的熟悉程度、良好的社会支持以及知道该服务提供隐私。

结论

在第一项探索学习障碍者使用 STI/BBV 自我采样包的可用性的研究中,参与者发现该套件难以使用。将信息限制在告知决策所需的最低限度、“易读”格式、简单语言、大字体大小和更简单的图表可以提高可接受性。然而,有些人仍然无法参与自我采样。为了避免扩大健康不平等,对于那些无法或不愿意参与自我管理护理的人,应该继续提供面对面的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37cf/8165145/0506a1f5ce49/sextrans-2020-054869f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37cf/8165145/2b9813f38b9c/sextrans-2020-054869f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37cf/8165145/0506a1f5ce49/sextrans-2020-054869f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37cf/8165145/2b9813f38b9c/sextrans-2020-054869f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37cf/8165145/0506a1f5ce49/sextrans-2020-054869f02.jpg

相似文献

1
How can we make self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infections and bloodborne viruses more inclusive? A qualitative study with people with mild learning disabilities and low health literacy.如何使性传播感染和血源性病原体的自我采样包更具包容性?一项针对轻度学习障碍和低健康素养人群的定性研究。
Sex Transm Infect. 2021 Jun;97(4):276-281. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2020-054869. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
2
How does online postal self-sampling (OPSS) shape access to testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs)? A qualitative study of service users.在线邮政自我采样 (OPSS) 如何影响性传播感染 (STI) 的检测机会?一项服务使用者的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):2339. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19741-x.
3
Engaging End Users to Inform the Design and Social Marketing Strategy for a Web-Based Sexually Transmitted Infection/Blood-Borne Virus (STI/BBV) Testing Service for Young People in Victoria, Australia: Qualitative Study.让终端用户参与,为澳大利亚维多利亚州的年轻人设计基于网络的性传播感染/血源性病毒(STI/BBV)检测服务并制定社会营销策略:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 27;27:e63822. doi: 10.2196/63822.
4
Young people's perceptions of smartphone-enabled self-testing and online care for sexually transmitted infections: qualitative interview study.年轻人对智能手机辅助的性传播感染自我检测及在线护理的看法:定性访谈研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 13;16(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3648-y.
5
Understanding the barriers and facilitators to using self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infections and blood-borne viruses: Thematic analyses for intervention optimization.理解使用自我采样包进行性传播感染和血源病毒检测的障碍和促进因素:干预优化的主题分析。
Br J Health Psychol. 2023 Feb;28(1):156-173. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12617. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
6
7
Observational study of factors associated with return of home sampling kits for sexually transmitted infections requested online in the UK.英国在线申请的性传播感染家庭采样试剂盒回收相关因素的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e017978. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017978.
8
Testing for sexually transmitted infections and blood borne viruses on admission to Western Australian prisons.在进入西澳大利亚监狱时对性传播感染和血源病毒进行检测。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Oct 13;9:385. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-385.
9
Acceptability of testing for anorectal sexually transmitted infections and self-collected anal swabs in female sex workers, men who have sex with men and transgender women in Papua New Guinea.在巴布亚新几内亚,性工作者、男男性行为者和跨性别女性对检测肛门直肠性传播感染和自我采集肛拭子的接受程度。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 20;18(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5684-2.
10
Home sampling kits for sexually transmitted infections: preferences and concerns of men who have sex with men.性传播感染家庭采样试剂盒:男男性行为者的偏好和担忧。
Cult Health Sex. 2011 Mar;13(3):343-53. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2010.535018.

引用本文的文献

1
Sexual Health Literacy Among Adults With Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review.成年智障者的性健康素养:一项范围综述
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2025 May;69(5):345-369. doi: 10.1111/jir.13217. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
2
Evaluating the Implementation of Home-Based Sexual Health Care Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: Limburg4zero.评估男男性行为者居家性健康护理的实施情况:林堡4零项目。
AIDS Behav. 2025 Mar;29(3):976-992. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04579-6. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
3
How can HIV self-testing facilitate increased access to HIV testing among multiply marginalised populations? Perspectives from GBMSM and trans women in England and Wales.

本文引用的文献

1
Accelerated partner therapy (APT) partner notification for people with : protocol for the Limiting Undetected Sexually Transmitted infections to RedUce Morbidity (LUSTRUM) APT cross-over cluster randomised controlled trial.加速性伴侣治疗 (APT) 对性传播感染患者的性伴侣通知:减少发病风险的性传播感染检测 (LUSTRUM) APT 交叉集群随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 29;10(3):e034806. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034806.
2
Sexual health literacy among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: a conceptual framework for future research.男同性恋者、双性恋者和其他与男性发生性关系的男性的性健康素养:未来研究的概念框架。
Cult Health Sex. 2021 Feb;23(2):207-223. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2019.1700307. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
3
HIV 自我检测如何促进边缘人群获得更多的 HIV 检测?来自英格兰和威尔士的男男性行为者和跨性别女性的观点。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 29;19(10):e0312897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312897. eCollection 2024.
4
Who accessed STI testing in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic and how: Findings from Natsal-COVID, a cross-sectional quasi-representative survey.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,谁在英国接受了性传播感染检测,以及如何接受的:Natsal-COVID 的调查结果,这是一项横断面准代表性调查。
Int J STD AIDS. 2024 Nov;35(13):1055-1071. doi: 10.1177/09564624241277582. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
5
How does online postal self-sampling (OPSS) shape access to testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs)? A qualitative study of service users.在线邮政自我采样 (OPSS) 如何影响性传播感染 (STI) 的检测机会?一项服务使用者的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):2339. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19741-x.
6
Service user experiences of using internet-based testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs): a qualitative study.服务使用者使用基于互联网的性传播感染(STIs)检测的体验:一项定性研究。
Sex Transm Infect. 2024 Aug 19;100(6):356-361. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2024-056228.
7
Delivering HIV prevention medication online: Findings from a qualitative study exploring the acceptability of an online HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) care pathway among service users and healthcare professionals.在线提供艾滋病毒预防药物:一项定性研究的结果,该研究探讨了服务使用者和医疗保健专业人员对在线艾滋病毒暴露前预防(PrEP)护理途径的可接受性。
Digit Health. 2023 Nov 30;9:20552076231217816. doi: 10.1177/20552076231217816. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
Free HIV self-test for identification and linkage to care of previously undetected HIV infection in men who have sex with men in England and Wales (SELPHI): an open-label, internet-based, randomised controlled trial.在英格兰和威尔士,针对男男性行为者的 HIV 自我检测以发现和转介既往未检出的 HIV 感染:一项开放标签、基于互联网的随机对照试验(SELPHI)。
Lancet HIV. 2022 Dec;9(12):e838-e847. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00266-1.
9
Understanding the barriers and facilitators to using self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infections and blood-borne viruses: Thematic analyses for intervention optimization.理解使用自我采样包进行性传播感染和血源病毒检测的障碍和促进因素:干预优化的主题分析。
Br J Health Psychol. 2023 Feb;28(1):156-173. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12617. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
10
Using the behaviour change wheel approach to optimize self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infection and blood borne viruses.运用行为改变轮方法优化性传播感染和血源性病原体的自我采样包。
Br J Health Psychol. 2022 Nov;27(4):1382-1397. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12607. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
Provision of online HIV-related information to gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: a health literacy-informed critical appraisal of Canadian agency websites.
向男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性行为的男性提供在线艾滋病相关信息:基于健康素养对加拿大机构网站的批判性评估
Sex Health. 2019 Feb;16(1):39-46. doi: 10.1071/SH18092.
4
Comparing the characteristics of users of an online service for STI self-sampling with clinic service users: a cross-sectional analysis.比较性传播感染自我采样在线服务用户与诊所服务用户特征:一项横断面分析。
Sex Transm Infect. 2018 Aug;94(5):377-383. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053302. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
5
Digital mental health and intellectual disabilities: state of the evidence and future directions.数字心理健康与智力残疾:证据现状与未来方向。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2017 Nov;20(4):107-111. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102759. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
6
Shrinking the state: The fate of the NHS and social care.缩减国家职能:国民医疗服务体系与社会护理的命运
J R Soc Med. 2017 Feb;110(2):49-51. doi: 10.1177/0141076816686923.
7
Young people's perceptions of smartphone-enabled self-testing and online care for sexually transmitted infections: qualitative interview study.年轻人对智能手机辅助的性传播感染自我检测及在线护理的看法:定性访谈研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 13;16(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3648-y.
8
Can text messages increase safer sex behaviours in young people? Intervention development and pilot randomised controlled trial.短信能否增加年轻人的安全性行为?干预措施的制定与随机对照试验试点
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Jul;20(57):1-82. doi: 10.3310/hta20570.
9
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.定性内容分析的三种方法。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.