Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 2002 Holcombe Boulevard 152, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):137-144. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06772-y. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
Lack of timely follow-up of abnormal test results is common and has been implicated in missed or delayed diagnosis, resulting in potential for patient harm.
As part of a larger project to implement change strategies to improve follow-up of diagnostic test results, this study sought to identify specifically where implementation gaps exist, as well as possible solutions identified by front-line staff.
We used a semi-structured interview guide to collect qualitative data from Veterans Affairs (VA) facility staff who had experience with test results management and patient safety.
Twelve VA facilities across the USA.
Facility staff members (n = 27), including clinicians, lab and imaging professionals, nursing staff, patient safety professionals, and leadership.
We conducted a content analysis of interview transcripts to identify perceived barriers and high-risk areas for effective test result management, as well as recommendations for improvement.
We identified seven themes to guide further development of interventions to improve test result follow-up. Themes related to trainees, incidental findings, tracking systems for electronic health record notifications, outdated contact information, referrals, backup or covering providers, and responsibility for test results pending at discharge. Participants provided recommendations for improvement within each theme.
Perceived barriers and recommendations for improving test result follow-up often reflected previously known problems and their corresponding solutions, which have not been consistently implemented in practice. Better policy solutions and improvement methods, such as quality improvement collaboratives, may bridge the implementation gaps between knowledge and practice.
异常检验结果的后续跟进不及时较为常见,这可能导致漏诊或延误诊断,进而对患者造成潜在伤害。
作为实施改变策略以改善诊断性检验结果后续跟进的更大项目的一部分,本研究旨在明确实施过程中的具体差距,并确定一线工作人员发现的可能解决方案。
我们采用半结构化访谈指南,收集具有检验结果管理和患者安全经验的退伍军人事务部(VA)机构工作人员的定性数据。
美国 12 家 VA 机构。
机构工作人员(n=27),包括临床医生、实验室和影像专业人员、护理人员、患者安全专业人员和领导层。
我们对访谈记录进行内容分析,以确定有效检验结果管理的感知障碍和高风险领域,以及改进建议。
我们确定了七个主题,以指导进一步开发干预措施,以改善检验结果的后续跟进。这些主题与实习生、偶然发现、电子健康记录通知的跟踪系统、过时的联系方式、转介、后备或代理提供者以及待出院检验结果的责任有关。参与者在每个主题中都提出了改进建议。
对改善检验结果后续跟进的感知障碍和建议通常反映了先前已知的问题及其相应的解决方案,但这些问题在实践中并未得到一致实施。更好的政策解决方案和改进方法,例如质量改进合作,可能会缩小知识与实践之间的实施差距。