Suppr超能文献

为何检测结果仍会“失联”无法跟进:一项关于实施差距的定性研究。

Why Test Results Are Still Getting "Lost" to Follow-up: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Gaps.

机构信息

Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 2002 Holcombe Boulevard 152, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):137-144. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06772-y. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lack of timely follow-up of abnormal test results is common and has been implicated in missed or delayed diagnosis, resulting in potential for patient harm.

OBJECTIVE

As part of a larger project to implement change strategies to improve follow-up of diagnostic test results, this study sought to identify specifically where implementation gaps exist, as well as possible solutions identified by front-line staff.

DESIGN

We used a semi-structured interview guide to collect qualitative data from Veterans Affairs (VA) facility staff who had experience with test results management and patient safety.

SETTING

Twelve VA facilities across the USA.

PARTICIPANTS

Facility staff members (n = 27), including clinicians, lab and imaging professionals, nursing staff, patient safety professionals, and leadership.

APPROACH

We conducted a content analysis of interview transcripts to identify perceived barriers and high-risk areas for effective test result management, as well as recommendations for improvement.

RESULTS

We identified seven themes to guide further development of interventions to improve test result follow-up. Themes related to trainees, incidental findings, tracking systems for electronic health record notifications, outdated contact information, referrals, backup or covering providers, and responsibility for test results pending at discharge. Participants provided recommendations for improvement within each theme.

CONCLUSIONS

Perceived barriers and recommendations for improving test result follow-up often reflected previously known problems and their corresponding solutions, which have not been consistently implemented in practice. Better policy solutions and improvement methods, such as quality improvement collaboratives, may bridge the implementation gaps between knowledge and practice.

摘要

背景

异常检验结果的后续跟进不及时较为常见,这可能导致漏诊或延误诊断,进而对患者造成潜在伤害。

目的

作为实施改变策略以改善诊断性检验结果后续跟进的更大项目的一部分,本研究旨在明确实施过程中的具体差距,并确定一线工作人员发现的可能解决方案。

设计

我们采用半结构化访谈指南,收集具有检验结果管理和患者安全经验的退伍军人事务部(VA)机构工作人员的定性数据。

地点

美国 12 家 VA 机构。

参与者

机构工作人员(n=27),包括临床医生、实验室和影像专业人员、护理人员、患者安全专业人员和领导层。

方法

我们对访谈记录进行内容分析,以确定有效检验结果管理的感知障碍和高风险领域,以及改进建议。

结果

我们确定了七个主题,以指导进一步开发干预措施,以改善检验结果的后续跟进。这些主题与实习生、偶然发现、电子健康记录通知的跟踪系统、过时的联系方式、转介、后备或代理提供者以及待出院检验结果的责任有关。参与者在每个主题中都提出了改进建议。

结论

对改善检验结果后续跟进的感知障碍和建议通常反映了先前已知的问题及其相应的解决方案,但这些问题在实践中并未得到一致实施。更好的政策解决方案和改进方法,例如质量改进合作,可能会缩小知识与实践之间的实施差距。

相似文献

1
Why Test Results Are Still Getting "Lost" to Follow-up: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Gaps.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):137-144. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06772-y. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
2
3
How context affects electronic health record-based test result follow-up: a mixed-methods evaluation.
BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 11;4(11):e005985. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005985.
5
Understanding the management of electronic test result notifications in the outpatient setting.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Apr 12;11:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-22.
6
8
Staff Perspectives on Primary Care Teams as De Facto "Hubs" for Care Coordination in VA: a Qualitative Study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(Suppl 1):82-89. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04967-y.

引用本文的文献

1
A Virtual Breakthrough Series Collaborative for Missed Test Results: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2440269. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40269.
2
Interventions to improve timely cancer diagnosis: an integrative review.
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Oct 18;12(2):153-162. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0113. eCollection 2025 May 1.

本文引用的文献

2
Prioritizing Features to Redesign in an EMR System.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:1213-1217. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190419.
3
Medicine's Shame Problem.
J Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;57(3):329-338. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.06.034. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
4
5
Barriers and facilitators impacting reliability of the electronic health record-facilitated total testing process.
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jul;127:102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
6
How to do a Virtual Breakthrough Series Collaborative.
J Med Syst. 2019 Jan 3;43(2):27. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1126-z.
7
Application of electronic trigger tools to identify targets for improving diagnostic safety.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Feb;28(2):151-159. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008086. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
9
A Systematic Review of Interventions to Follow-Up Test Results Pending at Discharge.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):750-758. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4290-9. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
10
Electronic Triggers to Identify Delays in Follow-Up of Mammography: Harnessing the Power of Big Data in Health Care.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Feb;15(2):287-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验