Suppr超能文献

基于 2D CT 的全膝关节置换中股骨组件旋转对线的测量准确性。

Accuracy of 2D CT-Based Measurements of Rotational Alignment of the Femoral Component for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yong-In Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2021 May;62(5):439-445. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.5.439.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the accuracy of two-dimensional computed tomography (2D-CT)-based methods for measuring rotational alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty in comparison to reference values for three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We selected the "most protruding transepicondylar axis section," "most protruding posterior condylar line section," and "distal femoral cut section" on 2D-CT images for 100 knees. We investigated posterior condylar angle (PCA) and condylar twist angle (CTA) values using three different methods on 2D-CT and compared to these values to those obtained using a 3D model.

RESULTS

The mean PCA and CTA values were 2.8° and 7.0° on the 3D model and 2.0° to 2.1° and 5.9° to 6.0° on 2D-CT, respectively. Errors in PCA and CTA measurement included internal rotation of 0.8° and 1.1° with the 1-plane and 2-plane methods and 0.9° and 1.0° with the assumed resection method, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Mean errors in PCA and CTA values measured using three different methods on 2D-CT were not significantly different. However, PCA and CTA values measured on 2D-CT were approximately 1° smaller than their 3D values. Thus, we suggest that adding 1° to the mean PCA and CTA values obtained from a single plane of 2D-CT would provide values similar to those obtained from 3D reconstruction.

摘要

目的

我们旨在研究二维计算机断层扫描(2D-CT)测量全膝关节置换术中股骨组件旋转对线的方法的准确性,并与三维(3D)重建的参考值进行比较。

材料和方法

我们在 100 个膝关节的 2D-CT 图像上选择了“最突出的髁间横轴线节段”、“最突出的后髁线节段”和“股骨远端切过节段”。我们使用三种不同的方法在 2D-CT 上研究了后髁角(PCA)和髁扭转角(CTA)值,并将这些值与使用 3D 模型获得的值进行了比较。

结果

3D 模型上的平均 PCA 和 CTA 值分别为 2.8°和 7.0°,2D-CT 上分别为 2.0°至 2.1°和 5.9°至 6.0°。PCA 和 CTA 测量误差包括 1 平面和 2 平面法的 0.8°和 1.1°的内旋和假设切除法的 0.9°和 1.0°的内旋。

结论

三种不同方法在 2D-CT 上测量的 PCA 和 CTA 值的平均误差没有显著差异。然而,2D-CT 上测量的 PCA 和 CTA 值比其 3D 值小约 1°。因此,我们建议从 2D-CT 的单个平面获得的平均 PCA 和 CTA 值增加 1°,可以提供与 3D 重建获得的值相似的值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e5e/8084701/30b4d1814506/ymj-62-439-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验