General internist and faculty member in the Rural Medicine Programs at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.
Fellow in the Rural Health Leadership Fellowship Program at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.
AMA J Ethics. 2021 Mar 1;23(3):E215-222. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.215.
The Indian Health Service (IHS) administers health care services to American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) in the United States. The agency funds referral care services through the Purchased/Referred Care (PRC) Program, which prioritizes its budget to pay for emergent care. This commentary responds to a case about a physician's disappointment that a referral for nonemergent care is deferred for payment by the PRC Program. Jonsen et al's 4-quadrant approach (a microethical case analysis model) is applied to suggest that deferring referrals is just only when the PRC Program operates fairly. This model, however, might inadequately account for structural inequities underlying referral care rationing by the IHS, a federal entity that is legally and ethically obligated to care comprehensively for AI/AN patients.
美国印第安人卫生服务局(IHS)为美国的美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)提供医疗保健服务。该机构通过购买/转介护理(PRC)计划为转介护理服务提供资金,该计划将其预算优先用于支付紧急护理费用。本评论回应了一个关于医生对 PRC 计划推迟非紧急护理转介付款感到失望的案例。Jonsen 等人的 4 象限方法(一种微观伦理案例分析模型)被应用于建议只有在 PRC 计划公平运作时才推迟转介。然而,这种模式可能无法充分说明 IHS 转介护理配给背后的结构性不平等,IHS 是一个在法律和道德上有义务全面照顾 AI/AN 患者的联邦实体。