Murray J L, Lamki L M, Shanken L J, Blake M E, Plager C E, Benjamin R S, Schweighardt S, Unger M W, Rosenblum M G
Department of Clinical Immunology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030.
Cancer Res. 1988 Aug 1;48(15):4417-22.
Liver uptake of 111In-labeled monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) remains a significant problem in radioimaging studies to date. To determine if the observed liver uptake of an 111In-labeled anti-melanoma antibody 96.5 (111In-96.5) was dependent on the presence of hepatic antigen or on recognition of circulating murine antibody, escalating doses of an unlabeled nonimmunoreactive MoAb (NIR-MoAb) were administered to 18 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma either 1 or 24 h prior to an infusion of 1 mg of 111In-96.5. The number of metastases imaged, pharmacokinetics, and the ratio of radioactivity (expressed as average counts/pixel) in liver (L), spleen (S), bone (B), and kidney (K) compared to blood pool (heart = H) were examined. Results were prospectively compared with data from six patients who received immunoreactive unlabeled 96.5 prior to 111In-96.5. Increasing dose or changes in the preinfusion time of NIR-MoAb had no significant effect on the biodistribution of 111In-96.5. In contrast, patients who received unlabeled, immunoreactive 96.5 prior to 111In-96.5 infusion demonstrated a significant drop [P less than 0.001] in the liver/heart ratio of radioactivity [2.81 +/- 0.35 (SEM)] compared to patients receiving the identical dose of NIR-MoAb [10.35 +/- 1.33]. Significant decreases in spleen/heart and bone/heart ratios were also observed. Pharmacokinetic studies showed that the volume of distribution (Vd) and the plasma t1/2 both decreased when 96.5 was administered compared to NIR-MoAb. In addition, a 4-fold increase in concentration X time was obtained after 96.5 antibody was administered compared to NIR-MoAb. More metastases were imaged in patients receiving preinfusions of 96.5 (23 of 28) than in patients receiving NIR-MoAb (10 of 18; P less than 0.05). Although tissue distribution of 111In-labeled antibody can be ascribed to nonspecific organ clearance of murine antibodies, a substantial component of tissue disposition of antibody 96.5 was shown to be a consequence of specific clearance of immunoreactive antibody which may cross-react with tissue antigens.
迄今为止,在放射性成像研究中,肝脏对铟 - 111标记的单克隆抗体(MoAb)的摄取仍然是一个重大问题。为了确定观察到的铟 - 111标记的抗黑色素瘤抗体96.5(铟 - 111 - 96.5)在肝脏中的摄取是取决于肝脏抗原的存在还是对循环鼠抗体的识别,在输注1毫克铟 - 111 - 96.5前1小时或24小时,给18例转移性恶性黑色素瘤患者给予递增剂量的未标记非免疫反应性MoAb(NIR - MoAb)。检查成像的转移灶数量、药代动力学以及肝脏(L)、脾脏(S)、骨骼(B)和肾脏(K)与血池(心脏 = H)相比的放射性比值(以平均计数/像素表示)。将结果与6例在注射铟 - 111 - 96.5之前接受免疫反应性未标记96.5的患者的数据进行前瞻性比较。NIR - MoAb剂量增加或输注前时间改变对铟 - 111 - 96.5的生物分布没有显著影响。相比之下,在输注铟 - 111 - 96.5之前接受未标记免疫反应性96.5的患者,其肝脏/心脏放射性比值[2.81±0.35(SEM)]与接受相同剂量NIR - MoAb的患者[10.35±1.33]相比显著下降[P<0.001]。脾脏/心脏和骨骼/心脏比值也显著降低。药代动力学研究表明,与NIR - MoAb相比,给予96.5时分布容积(Vd)和血浆半衰期均降低。此外,与NIR - MoAb相比,给予96.5抗体后浓度×时间增加了4倍。接受96.5预输注的患者(28例中的23例)成像的转移灶比接受NIR - MoAb的患者(18例中的10例)更多(P<0.05)。虽然铟 - 111标记抗体的组织分布可归因于鼠抗体的非特异性器官清除,但抗体96.5的组织处置的很大一部分被证明是免疫反应性抗体与组织抗原可能发生交叉反应的特异性清除的结果。