• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2017 年与 2013 年美国普通外科手术实践规模和环境的比较。

Comparison of General Surgical Practice Size and Setting in 2017 vs 2013 in the US.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216848. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6848.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6848
PMID:33909056
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8082320/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

As health care delivery markets have changed and new payment models have emerged, physicians in many specialties have consolidated their practices, but whether this consolidation has occurred in surgical practices is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To examine changes in the size of surgical practices, market-level factors associated with this consolidation, and how place of service for surgical care delivery varies by practice size.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study of Medicare Data on Provider Practice and Specialty from January 1 to December 31, 2013, compared with January 1 to December 31, 2017, was conducted on all general surgeon practices caring for patients enrolled in Medicare in the US. Data analysis was performed from November 4, 2019, to January 9, 2020.

EXPOSURES

Practice sizes in 2013 and 2017 were compared relative to hospital market concentration measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index in the hospital referral region.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the change in size of surgical practices over the study period. Secondary outcomes included change in surgical practice market concentration and the place of service for provision of surgical care stratified by surgical practice size.

RESULTS

From 2013 to 2017, the number of surgical practices in the US decreased from 10 432 to 8451. The proportion of surgeons decreased in practices with 1 (from 26.2% to 17.4%), 2 (from 8.3% to 6.6%), and 3 to 5 (from 18.0% to 16.5%) surgeons, and the proportion of surgeons in practices with 6 or more surgeons increased (from 47.6% to 59.5%). Hospital concentration was associated with an increase in the size of the surgical practice. Each 10% increase in the hospital market concentration was associated with an increase of 0.204 surgeons (95% CI, 0.020-0.388 surgeons; P = .03) per practice from 2013 to 2017. Similarly, a 10% increase in the hospital-level HHI was associated with an increase in the surgical practice HHI of 0.023 (95% CI, 0.013-0.033; P < .001). Large surgical practices increased their share of Medicare services provided from 36.5% in 2013 to 45.6% in 2017. Large practices (31.3% inpatient in 2013 to 33.1% in 2017) were much more likely than small practices (19.0% inpatient in 2013 to 17.7% in 2017) to be based in hospital settings and this gap widened over time.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Surgeons have increasingly joined larger practices over time, and there has been a significant decrease in solo, small, and midsize surgical practices. The consolidation of surgeons into larger practices appears to be associated with hospital market concentration in the same market. Although overall care appears to be more hospital based for larger practices, the association between the consolidation of surgical practices and patient access and outcomes should be studied.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/255e/8082320/48c3679c3dac/jamanetwopen-e216848-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/255e/8082320/0735ad71bd8f/jamanetwopen-e216848-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/255e/8082320/49e8af4f9fb7/jamanetwopen-e216848-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/255e/8082320/5c7f2afdff9d/jamanetwopen-e216848-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/255e/8082320/48c3679c3dac/jamanetwopen-e216848-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/255e/8082320/0735ad71bd8f/jamanetwopen-e216848-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/255e/8082320/49e8af4f9fb7/jamanetwopen-e216848-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/255e/8082320/5c7f2afdff9d/jamanetwopen-e216848-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/255e/8082320/48c3679c3dac/jamanetwopen-e216848-g004.jpg
摘要

重要性

随着医疗保健服务市场的变化和新的支付模式的出现,许多专业的医生已经整合了他们的实践,但这种整合是否发生在外科实践中尚不清楚。

目的

研究外科实践规模的变化、与这种整合相关的市场因素,以及手术服务提供的服务地点如何因实践规模而异。

设计、地点和参与者:一项横断面研究比较了 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日和 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间美国所有接受 Medicare 患者的普通外科医生实践的数据,该研究基于 Provider Practice 和 Specialty 的 Medicare 数据。数据分析于 2019 年 11 月 4 日至 2020 年 1 月 9 日进行。

暴露因素

比较了 2013 年和 2017 年的实践规模,相对于医院参考区域的赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数(Herfindahl-Hirschman Index)衡量的医院市场集中程度。

主要结果和测量

主要结果是研究期间外科实践规模的变化。次要结果包括外科实践市场集中程度的变化以及按外科实践规模分层的外科护理提供地点的变化。

结果

从 2013 年到 2017 年,美国的外科实践数量从 10432 个减少到 8451 个。在有 1 名(从 26.2%降至 17.4%)、2 名(从 8.3%降至 6.6%)和 3 至 5 名(从 18.0%降至 16.5%)外科医生的实践中,外科医生的比例下降,而在有 6 名或更多外科医生的实践中,外科医生的比例增加(从 47.6%增加到 59.5%)。医院集中与外科实践规模的增加有关。医院市场集中每增加 10%,与 2013 年至 2017 年期间每实践增加 0.204 名外科医生(95%置信区间,0.020-0.388 名外科医生;P = .03)相关。同样,医院级别的 HHI 每增加 10%,与外科实践 HHI 增加 0.023(95%置信区间,0.013-0.033;P < .001)相关。大型外科实践将其提供的 Medicare 服务份额从 2013 年的 36.5%增加到 2017 年的 45.6%。大型实践(2013 年住院患者 31.3%至 2017 年住院患者 33.1%)比小型实践(2013 年住院患者 19.0%至 2017 年住院患者 17.7%)更有可能基于医院环境,而且这种差距随着时间的推移而扩大。

结论和相关性

随着时间的推移,外科医生越来越多地加入更大的实践,而单独、小型和中型的外科实践数量显著减少。外科医生向更大实践的整合似乎与同一市场中的医院市场集中有关。尽管总体护理似乎更以医院为基础,但应该研究外科实践整合与患者获得和结果之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Comparison of General Surgical Practice Size and Setting in 2017 vs 2013 in the US.2017 年与 2013 年美国普通外科手术实践规模和环境的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216848. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6848.
2
Practice Consolidation Among U.S. Radiation Oncologists Over Time.美国放射肿瘤学家的实践巩固随时间变化。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Nov 1;111(3):610-618. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.06.009. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
3
Association of Primary Care Practice Location and Ownership With the Provision of Low-Value Care in the United States.美国基层医疗服务机构的地点和所有权与低价值医疗服务提供情况的关联
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):838-845. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0410.
4
Trends in Orthopedic Surgeon Practice Consolidation From 2008 to 2019.2008 年至 2019 年骨科医生执业整合趋势。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Mar;37(3):409-413. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.11.015. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
5
Association of Financial Integration Between Physicians and Hospitals With Commercial Health Care Prices.医生和医院之间财务融合与商业医疗价格的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1932-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4610.
6
Commercial Price Variation for Breast Reconstruction in the Era of Price Transparency.商业价格变化对乳房重建的影响——价格透明时代。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Feb 1;158(2):152-160. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6402.
7
Proportion of physicians in large group practices continued to grow in 2009-11.2009-11 年期间,大型团体医疗机构中的医师比例持续增长。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Sep;32(9):1659-66. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1256.
8
Consolidation trends in vascular surgery.血管外科学的整合趋势。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Feb;79(2):412-417. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.11.010. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
9
Gender-Based Variations in Medicare Reimbursements Among Different Surgical Subspecialties.不同外科亚专科 Medicare 报销中的基于性别的差异。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Sep 1;159(9):1060-1070. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2298.
10
Physician practice competition and prices paid by private insurers for office visits.医生执业竞争与私人保险公司支付的门诊费用。
JAMA. 2014;312(16):1653-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.10921.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Practice Patterns of the Emergency Physician Workforce Before and After Attrition.急诊医师队伍人员流失前后的临床实践模式
Ann Emerg Med. 2025 Jun;85(6):483-488. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.01.023. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
2
The Risks and Benefits of Physician Practice Acquisition and Consolidation: A Narrative Review of Peer-Reviewed Publications Between 2009 and 2022 in the United States.医师执业收购与合并的风险和益处:对2009年至2022年美国同行评审出版物的叙述性综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 May 14;17:2271-2279. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S463618. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Consolidation Of Providers Into Health Systems Increased Substantially, 2016-18.2016 年至 2018 年,医疗机构向医疗体系的整合大大增加。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Aug;39(8):1321-1325. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00017.
2
Consolidation Among Cardiologists Across U.S. Practices Over Time.随着时间推移,美国各地心脏病专家之间的合并情况。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Aug 4;76(5):590-593. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.081.
3
The Surgical Health Services Research Agenda for the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19大流行期间的外科健康服务研究议程。
Ann Surg. 2020 Sep 1;272(3):e226-e229. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004126.
4
Quality Measure Development and Associated Spending by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的质量衡量标准制定和相关支出。
JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1614-1616. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1816.
5
Changes in Quality of Care after Hospital Mergers and Acquisitions.医院并购后的医疗质量变化。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 2;382(1):51-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1901383.
6
Ten-year reassessment of the shortage of general surgeons: Increases in graduation numbers of general surgery residents are insufficient to meet the future demand for general surgeons.十年间普通外科医生短缺状况的再评估:普通外科住院医师毕业人数的增加不足以满足未来对普通外科医生的需求。
Surgery. 2018 Oct;164(4):726-732. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.04.042. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
7
Hospital-Physician Consolidation Accelerated In The Past Decade In Cardiology, Oncology.在过去十年中,心脏病学和肿瘤学领域的医院-医师整合加速。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jul;37(7):1123-1127. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1520.
8
The effect of hospital acquisitions of physician practices on prices and spending.医院收购医生诊所对价格和支出的影响。
J Health Econ. 2018 May;59:139-152. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
9
Referral Regions for Time-Sensitive Acute Care Conditions in the United States.美国时间敏感性急性病救治的转诊区域。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;72(2):147-155. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
10
Paying a Premium on Your Premium? Consolidation in the US Health Insurance Industry.为你的保费支付额外费用?美国健康保险行业的整合。
Am Econ Rev. 2012 Apr;102(2):1161-85. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.2.1161.