• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Gender-Based Variations in Medicare Reimbursements Among Different Surgical Subspecialties.不同外科亚专科 Medicare 报销中的基于性别的差异。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Sep 1;159(9):1060-1070. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2298.
2
Does Merit-based Incentive Payment System Performance Differ Based on Orthopaedic Surgeon Gender?基于绩效的激励支付系统的表现是否因骨科医生的性别而异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 May 1;483(5):820-828. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003350. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
3
A Small Number of Surgeons Perform the Large Majority of Uncommon Nerve Decompression Procedures.少数外科医生完成了绝大多数不常见的神经减压手术。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2182-2190. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003162. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
4
Are Quality Scores in the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System Associated With Outcomes After Outpatient Orthopaedic Surgery?医疗补助与医疗照顾服务中心基于绩效的激励支付系统中的质量评分与门诊骨科手术后的结果相关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1107-1116. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003033. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
5
Elective THA for Indications Other Than Osteoarthritis Is Associated With Increased Cost and Resource Use: A Medicare Database Study of 135,194 Claims.择期全髋关节置换术用于治疗非骨关节炎的适应证与更高的成本和资源利用相关:一项基于 Medicare 数据库的 135194 例患者的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1159-1170. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002922. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
6
Gender Differences in Medicare Practice and Payment of Neuroradiologists.医疗保险中神经放射科医生执业及支付方面的性别差异。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun 3;46(6):1093-1099. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8633.
7
Quantifying Indirect Billing Within the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.在医疗保险医师费率表中量化间接计费
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Apr 4;6(4):e250433. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0433.
8
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?疑虑重重:骨科手术教员和住院医师在种族和性别方面是否存在隐性偏见?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
9
Practice-Level Spending Variation for Radiation Treatment Episodes Among Older Adults With Cancer.老年癌症患者放射治疗疗程的实践水平支出差异
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jul 3;6(7):e251952. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1952.
10
Quality of Hospices Used by Medicare Advantage and Traditional Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries.医疗保险优势计划和传统按服务付费受益人群所使用的临终关怀服务质量
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2451227. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51227.

引用本文的文献

1
A Decade of Medicare Part B Reimbursement to Plastic Surgeons: Gender Pay Gaps Persist.医疗保险B部分向整形外科医生报销十年:性别薪酬差距依然存在。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jun 6;13(6):e6850. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006850. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Variations in medicare reimbursements among surgical oncologists who are US versus international medical graduates.美国医学毕业生与国际医学毕业生的外科肿瘤学家在医疗保险报销方面的差异。
World J Surg. 2025 Feb;49(2):512-522. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12458. Epub 2024 Dec 22.

不同外科亚专科 Medicare 报销中的基于性别的差异。

Gender-Based Variations in Medicare Reimbursements Among Different Surgical Subspecialties.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus.

Deputy Editor, JAMA Surgery.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2024 Sep 1;159(9):1060-1070. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2298.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2298
PMID:39046733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11270248/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Gender inequities and limited representation are an obstacle to surgical workforce diversification. There has been limited examination of gender-based disparities in billing practices among surgeons.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate variations in practice metrics and billing practices among female and male surgeons and identify factors associated with gender disparities in Medicare reimbursements.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cross-sectional study used publicly available Medicare Fee-for-Service Provider Utilization and Payment data from January to December 31, 2021, to identify demographics, annual services provided, and financial payments and charges for general surgeons, surgical oncologists, and colorectal surgeons. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to February 2024.

EXPOSURE

The primary exposure of interest was surgeon gender (ie, female or male).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The annual total submitted charges and payments submitted in 2021 by female and male surgeons were assessed. Additionally, the total number and types of services provided each year and the number of beneficiaries treated were examined. Multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate the association of surgeon gender with payments, number of services, and beneficiaries.

RESULTS

A total of 20 549 general surgeons (5036 [24.5%] female; 15 513 [75.5%] male), 1065 surgical oncologists (450 [42.3%] female; 615 [57.7%] male), and 1601 colorectal surgeons (432 [27.0%] female; 1169 [73.0%] male) were included. Across all surgical subspecialties, female surgeons billed fewer mean (SE) Medicare charges (general surgeons: 30.1% difference; $224 934.80 [$3846.97] vs $321 868.50 [$3933.57]; surgical oncologists: 27.5% difference; $277 901.70 [$22 857.37] vs $382 882.90 [$19 566.06]; colorectal surgeons: 21.7% difference; $274 091.70 [$10 468.48] vs $350 146.10 [$8741.66]; all P < .001) and received significantly lower mean (SE) reimbursements (general surgeons: 29.0% difference; $51 787.61 [$917.91] vs $72 903.12 [$890.35]; surgical oncologists: 23.6% difference; $57 945.18 [$3853.28] vs $75 778.22 [$2622.75]; colorectal surgeons: 24.5% difference; $63 117.01 [$2248.10] vs $83 598.53 [$1934.77]; all P < .001). On multivariable analysis, a reimbursement gap remained across all 3 surgical subspecialties (general surgeons: -$14 963.46 [95% CI, -$18 822.27 to -$11 104.64] [P < .001]; surgical oncologists: -$8354.69 [95% CI, -$15 018.12 to -$1691.25] [P = .01]; colorectal surgeons: -$4346.73 [95% CI, -$7660.15 to -$1033.32] [P = .01]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, there was considerable gender-based variation in practice patterns and reimbursement among different surgical subspecialties serving the Medicare population. Differences in mean payment per service were associated with variations in billing and coding strategies among female and male surgeons.

摘要

重要性:性别不平等和代表性有限是外科劳动力多元化的障碍。外科医生计费做法方面的性别差异研究有限。

目的:评估女性和男性外科医生之间的实践指标和计费做法的差异,并确定与医疗保险报销中性别差距相关的因素。

设计、设置和参与者:本回顾性横断面研究使用 2021 年 1 月至 12 月 31 日公开的医疗保险按服务付费者使用和支付数据,确定普通外科医生、外科肿瘤学家和结直肠外科医生的人口统计学数据、每年提供的服务数量以及财务支付和收费。数据分析于 2024 年 2 月进行。

暴露:主要暴露因素是外科医生的性别(即女性或男性)。

主要结果和措施:评估了女性和男性外科医生 2021 年提交的年度总收费和支付情况。此外,还检查了每年提供的服务总数和类型以及治疗的受益人数。使用多变量线性回归模型评估外科医生性别与支付、服务数量和受益人数的关联。

结果:共有 20549 名普通外科医生(5036 [24.5%] 名女性;15513 [75.5%] 名男性)、1065 名外科肿瘤学家(450 [42.3%] 名女性;615 [57.7%] 名男性)和 1601 名结直肠外科医生(432 [27.0%] 名女性;1169 [73.0%] 名男性)纳入研究。在所有外科亚专业中,女性外科医生开具的医疗保险计费较少(普通外科医生:30.1%差异;$224934.80[3846.97] 与$321868.50[3933.57];外科肿瘤学家:27.5%差异;$277901.70[22857.37] 与$382882.90[19566.06];结直肠外科医生:21.7%差异;$274091.70[10468.48] 与$350146.10[8741.66];所有 P<0.001),且收到的报销金额明显较低(普通外科医生:29.0%差异;$51787.61[917.91] 与$72903.12[890.35];外科肿瘤学家:23.6%差异;$57945.18[3853.28] 与$75778.22[2622.75];结直肠外科医生:24.5%差异;$63117.01[2248.10] 与$83598.53[1934.77];所有 P<0.001)。在多变量分析中,所有 3 个外科亚专业仍存在报销差距(普通外科医生:-$14963.46[95%CI,-$18822.27 至-$11104.64] [P<0.001];外科肿瘤学家:-$8354.69[95%CI,-$15018.12 至-$1691.25] [P=0.01];结直肠外科医生:-$4346.73[95%CI,-$7660.15 至-$1033.32] [P=0.01])。

结论和相关性:在这项横断面研究中,为医疗保险人群服务的不同外科亚专业之间的实践模式和报销存在相当大的性别差异。服务平均支付金额的差异与女性和男性外科医生计费和编码策略的差异有关。