Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Vall D'Hebron University Hospital, Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jul;188(2):449-458. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06217-4. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
To characterize health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from the NALA phase 3 study.
In NALA (NCT01808573), patients were randomized 1:1 to neratinib + capecitabine (N + C) or lapatinib + capecitabine (L + C). HRQoL was assessed using seven prespecified scores from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality Of Life Questionnaire core module (QLQ-C30) and breast cancer-specific questionnaire (QLQ-BR23) at baseline and every 6 weeks. Descriptive statistics summarized scores over time, mixed models evaluated differences between treatment arms, and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to assess time to deterioration in HRQoL scores of ≥ 10 points.
Of the 621 patients randomized in NALA, patients were included in the HRQoL analysis if they completed baseline and at least one follow-up questionnaire. The summary, global health status, physical functioning, fatigue, constipation, and systemic therapy side effects scores were stable over time with no persistent differences between treatment groups. There were no differences in time to deterioration (TTD) for the QLQ-C30 summary score between treatment arms; the hazard ratio (HR) for N + C vs. L + C was 0.94 (95% CI 0.63-1.40). Only the diarrhea score worsened significantly more in the N + C arm as compared to the L + C arm, and this remained over time (HR for TTD for N + C vs. L + C was 1.71 [95% CI 1.32-2.23]).
In NALA, patients treated with N + C maintained their global HRQoL over time, despite a worsening of the diarrhea-related scores. These results may help guide optimal treatment selection for HER2-positive MBC.
从 NALA 阶段 3 研究中描述人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)阳性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。
在 NALA(NCT01808573)中,患者按 1:1 随机分配至奈拉替尼+卡培他滨(N+C)或拉帕替尼+卡培他滨(L+C)组。使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心模块(QLQ-C30)和乳腺癌特定问卷(QLQ-BR23)的七个预设评分在基线和每 6 周评估 HRQoL。使用描述性统计总结随时间变化的评分,混合模型评估治疗臂之间的差异,并使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法评估 HRQoL 评分恶化≥10 分的时间。
在 NALA 中随机分配的 621 例患者中,如果患者完成了基线和至少一次随访问卷,则将其纳入 HRQoL 分析。总结、总体健康状况、身体功能、疲劳、便秘和全身治疗副作用评分随时间稳定,两组之间没有持续差异。两组之间 QLQ-C30 总分的恶化时间(TTD)无差异;N+C 与 L+C 的危险比(HR)为 0.94(95%CI 0.63-1.40)。与 L+C 组相比,只有 N+C 组的腹泻评分显著恶化,且随时间推移仍如此(N+C 与 L+C 的 TTD HR 为 1.71 [95%CI 1.32-2.23])。
在 NALA 中,尽管腹泻相关评分恶化,但接受 N+C 治疗的患者随时间保持其整体 HRQoL。这些结果可能有助于指导 HER2 阳性 MBC 的最佳治疗选择。