Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1472, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030-4009.
Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, CA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jul;217(1):157-163. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22520. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
The purpose of this article is to investigate the oncologic effectiveness and survival outcomes of percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation for clinical T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients with other primary nonrenal malignancies. We reviewed records of patients with histologically proven T1a RCC (< 4.0 cm) treated with thermal ablation over a period of 10 years between January 2005 and December 2014. We recorded past or current history of primary malignancy other than RCC, status of the primary malignancy, tumor histology (in remission or under therapy), and whether patient was currently alive or not, and if not, the date and reason of death. Three cohorts were studied: patients with RCC only (group A), patients with RCC and other primary malignancy in remission (group B), and patients with RCC and other primary malignancy under treatment (group C). The Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator was used to estimate the survival rates. One hundred nine patients met the inclusion criteria (109 lesions, 110 ablation procedures). There were 46, 45, and 18 patients in the A, B, and C groups, respectively. The 5-year survival was 87%, 63%, and 40% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The local recurrence-free survival for the whole sample was 95% at 3, 5, and 10 years. The disease-free survival was 96%, 93%, and 91% at 3, 5, and 10 years. Although a significant difference is noted between the three cohorts in overall survival ( = .02); for RCC, there were no significance differences in the local recurrence-free, disease-free, metastasis-free, and cancer-specific survivals. In addition, there was no difference in outcomes for patients in group B (in remission) when compared with those in group C (under treatment). Thermal ablation is an effective and safe modality of treatment of T1a RCC in patients with other primary malignancies that are in remission or under treatment.
本文旨在探讨经皮影像引导热消融治疗其他原发性非肾恶性肿瘤患者临床 T1a 肾细胞癌(RCC)的肿瘤学疗效和生存结果。我们回顾了 2005 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间 10 年间接受热消融治疗的组织学证实的 T1a RCC(<4.0cm)患者的记录。我们记录了过去或当前除 RCC 以外的原发性恶性肿瘤病史、原发性恶性肿瘤的状态、肿瘤组织学(缓解或治疗中)以及患者当前是否存活,如果没有,死亡日期和原因。研究了三组:仅患有 RCC 的患者(A 组)、患有 RCC 且处于缓解期的其他原发性恶性肿瘤的患者(B 组)和患有 RCC 且正在治疗中的其他原发性恶性肿瘤的患者(C 组)。采用 Kaplan-Meier 乘积限估计法估计生存率。109 名患者符合纳入标准(109 个病灶,110 个消融程序)。A、B 和 C 组分别有 46、45 和 18 名患者。A、B 和 C 组的 5 年生存率分别为 87%、63%和 40%。全样本的局部无复发生存率分别为 3、5 和 10 年时的 95%。3、5 和 10 年时的无疾病生存率分别为 96%、93%和 91%。虽然三组之间的总生存率存在显著差异( =.02);对于 RCC,局部无复发生存率、无疾病生存率、无转移生存率和癌症特异性生存率无显著性差异。此外,与 C 组(治疗中)相比,B 组(缓解期)患者的结局无差异。对于缓解期或治疗中的其他原发性恶性肿瘤患者,经皮影像引导热消融是治疗 T1a RCC 的有效且安全的方法。