• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肯尼亚卡贾多县社区主导的替代成年礼对消除女性生殖器切割的影响:一项准实验研究。

The impact of community led alternative rite of passage on eradication of female genital mutilation/cutting in Kajiado County, Kenya: A quasi-experimental study.

机构信息

Department of Monitoring Evaluation and Research, Amref Health Africa in Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.

Directorate of Research and Learning, TradeMark East Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0249662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249662. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0249662
PMID:33909635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8081212/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In Kenya, Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) is highly prevalent in specific communities such as the Maasai and Somali. With the intention of curtailing FMG/C prevalence in Maasai community, Amref Health Africa, designed and implemented a novel intervention-community-led alternative rite of passage (CLARP) in Kajiado County in Kenya since 2009. The study: a) determined the impact of the CLARP model on FGM/C, child early and forced marriages (CEFM), teenage pregnancies (TP) and years of schooling among girls and b) explored the attitude, perception and practices of community stakeholders towards FGM/C.

METHODS

We utilised a mixed methods approach. A difference-in-difference approach was used to quantify the average impact of the model with Kajiado as the intervention County and Mandera, Marsabit and Wajir as control counties. The approach relied on secondary data analysis of the Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) 2003, 2008-2009 and 2014. A qualitative approach involving focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and key informant interviews were conducted with various respondents and community stakeholders to document experiences, attitude and practices towards FGM/C.

RESULTS

The CLARP has contributed to: 1) decline in FGM/C prevalence, CEFM rates and TP rates among girls by 24.2% (p<0.10), 4.9% (p<0.01) and 6.3% (p<0.01) respectively. 2) increase in girls schooling years by 2.5 years (p<0.05). Perceived CLARP benefits to girls included: reduction in teenage marriages and childbirth; increased school retention and completion; teenage pregnancies reduction and decline in FGM/C prevalence. Community stakeholders in Kajiado believe that CLARP has been embraced in the community because of its impacts in the lives of its beneficiaries and their families.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that CLARP has been positively received by the Maasai community and has played a significant role in attenuating FGM/C, CEFM and TP in Kajiado, while contributing to increasing girls' schooling years. CLARP is replicable as it is currently being implemented in Tanzania. We recommend scaling it up for adoption by stakeholders implementing in other counties that practice FGM/C as a rite of passage in Kenya and across other sub Saharan Africa countries.

摘要

简介

在肯尼亚,女性生殖器切割/切割(FGM/C)在某些社区如马赛和索马里非常普遍。为了减少马赛社区的 FGM/C 发生率,非洲健康行动组织(Amref Health Africa)自 2009 年以来在肯尼亚的卡贾多县设计并实施了一种新的干预措施——社区主导的替代成年礼(CLARP)。该研究:a)确定了 CLARP 模式对 FGM/C、儿童早婚和强迫婚姻(CEFM)、少女怀孕(TP)以及女孩受教育年限的影响;b)探讨了社区利益相关者对 FGM/C 的态度、看法和做法。

方法

我们采用了混合方法。采用差异法来量化该模式的平均影响,以卡贾多县为干预县,以曼德拉、马萨比特和瓦吉尔县为对照县。该方法依赖于对肯尼亚人口与健康调查(KDHS)2003、2008-2009 和 2014 年的二次数据分析。采用焦点小组讨论、深入访谈和关键知情人访谈等定性方法,记录了社区利益相关者对 FGM/C 的经验、态度和做法。

结果

CLARP 有助于:1)FGM/C 发生率、CEFM 率和少女怀孕率分别下降 24.2%(p<0.10)、4.9%(p<0.01)和 6.3%(p<0.01)。2)女孩受教育年限增加 2.5 年(p<0.05)。社区利益相关者认为 CLARP 对女孩的好处包括:减少少女婚姻和分娩;提高学校保留率和完成率;减少少女怀孕率和 FGM/C 发生率。卡贾多的社区利益相关者认为,CLARP 之所以在社区中得到接受,是因为它对受益者及其家庭的生活产生了影响。

结论

这项研究表明,CLARP 受到了马赛社区的积极欢迎,并在卡贾多地区减少 FGM/C、CEFM 和 TP 方面发挥了重要作用,同时也有助于增加女孩的受教育年限。CLARP 是可复制的,因为它目前正在坦桑尼亚实施。我们建议将其推广,供在肯尼亚和其他撒哈拉以南非洲国家实施 FGM/C 作为成年礼的县的利益相关者采用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a82/8081212/f17f16b5d627/pone.0249662.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a82/8081212/ed52666febed/pone.0249662.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a82/8081212/2e47695d8d16/pone.0249662.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a82/8081212/faed253a1c06/pone.0249662.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a82/8081212/f17f16b5d627/pone.0249662.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a82/8081212/ed52666febed/pone.0249662.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a82/8081212/2e47695d8d16/pone.0249662.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a82/8081212/faed253a1c06/pone.0249662.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a82/8081212/f17f16b5d627/pone.0249662.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of community led alternative rite of passage on eradication of female genital mutilation/cutting in Kajiado County, Kenya: A quasi-experimental study.肯尼亚卡贾多县社区主导的替代成年礼对消除女性生殖器切割的影响:一项准实验研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0249662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249662. eCollection 2021.
2
Female genital mutilation/cutting: Emerging factors sustaining medicalization related changes in selected Kenyan communities.女性生殖器切割/切割:肯尼亚部分社区中维持与医学化相关变化的新兴因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0228410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228410. eCollection 2020.
3
"Promote locally led initiatives to fight female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C)" lessons from anti-FGM/C advocates in rural Kenya.“推动以地方为主导的行动,打击女性外阴残割(FGM/C)”肯尼亚农村反 FGM/C 倡导者的经验教训。
Reprod Health. 2020 Feb 28;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-0884-5.
4
Exploring barriers to seeking health care among Kenyan Somali women with female genital mutilation: a qualitative study.探究肯尼亚索马里女性割礼女性寻求医疗保健的障碍:一项定性研究。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jan 28;20(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12914-020-0222-6.
5
Injured bodies, damaged lives: experiences and narratives of Kenyan women with obstetric fistula and Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting.受伤的身体,受损的生活:肯尼亚患有产科瘘和女性生殖器切割/环切的妇女的经历与叙述
Reprod Health. 2017 Mar 14;14(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0300-y.
6
Understanding the roles of Alternative Rites of Passage and Public Declarations in FGM/C abandonment: An ethnographic study among the Loita Maasai, Kenya.理解替代成年礼和公开声明在割礼/女性外阴残割习俗废弃中的作用:肯尼亚洛塔马赛人中的民族志研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Oct;359:116412. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116412. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
7
Exploring Perceptions of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Abandonment (FGM/C) in Kenyan Health Care Professionals.探讨肯尼亚卫生保健专业人员对女性生殖器切割/遗弃(FGM/C)的看法。
Qual Health Res. 2021 Sep;31(11):1976-1989. doi: 10.1177/10497323211015967. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
8
The perceived effects of COVID-19 pandemic on female genital mutilation/cutting and child or forced marriages in Kenya, Uganda, Ethiopia and Senegal.新冠疫情对肯尼亚、乌干达、埃塞俄比亚和塞内加尔女性外阴残割/切割和童婚/强迫婚姻的感知影响。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;22(1):601. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13043-w.
9
Lessons learned from implementing alternative rites in the fight against female genital mutilation/cutting.在反对女性生殖器切割的斗争中实施替代仪式的经验教训。
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Feb 4;32:59. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.32.59.17624. eCollection 2019.
10
A Spatial Analysis of the Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting among 0-14-Year-Old Girls in Kenya.肯尼亚 0-14 岁女童外阴残割/切割流行率的空间分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 28;16(21):4155. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214155.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends and determinants of female genital mutilation prevalence among women of reproductive age in Tanzania and Kenya: a demographic and health survey analysis (2008-2022).坦桑尼亚和肯尼亚育龄妇女中女性生殖器切割流行率的趋势及决定因素:一项人口与健康调查分析(2008 - 2022年)
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):2380. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23519-0.
2
Digital tracking of girls exposed to community led alternative rites of passage to prevent female genital mutilation/cutting, and child, early and forced marriages in Kenya: a longitudinal study.肯尼亚针对参与社区主导的替代成人仪式的女孩进行数字追踪,以预防女性生殖器切割/残割以及童婚、早婚和逼婚:一项纵向研究。
Front Reprod Health. 2025 May 20;7:1445504. doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1445504. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Legislation against girl circumcision: a cultural psychological understanding of prohibition.反对女性割礼的立法:对禁令的文化心理学理解
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019 Dec;27(1):1601964. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2019.1601964.
2
Secular trends in the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting among girls: a systematic analysis.女孩中女性生殖器切割/环切流行率的长期趋势:一项系统分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Nov 6;3(5):e000549. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000549. eCollection 2018.
3
Female Genital Mutilation: A Literature Review of the Current Status of Legislation and Policies in 27 African Countries and Yemen.
Impact of the Stopcut project on the practice of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in Southwest Nigeria: a quasi-experimental study.Stopcut项目对尼日利亚西南部女性生殖器切割习俗的影响:一项准实验研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 24;25(1):768. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21976-1.
4
COVID-19 and Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting and child marriage: An online multi-country cross sectional survey.COVID-19 与女性外阴残割/切割和童婚:一项在线多国家横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 31;19(10):e0304671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304671. eCollection 2024.
5
Do Attitude, Awareness and Intention to Perform Female Genital Mutilation or Cutting for Their Daughters of Women Healthcare Providers Differ from Mothers in Somalia?索马里女性医疗保健提供者对其女儿实施女性外阴残割或切割的态度、意识和意愿与母亲们有差异吗?
Int J Womens Health. 2023 Aug 11;15:1333-1343. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S411217. eCollection 2023.
女性生殖器切割:27个非洲国家和也门立法与政策现状的文献综述
Afr J Reprod Health. 2015 Sep;19(3):32-40.
4
What works and what does not: a discussion of popular approaches for the abandonment of female genital mutilation.哪些方法可行,哪些不可行:关于摒弃女性生殖器切割习俗常用方法的探讨
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:348248. doi: 10.1155/2013/348248. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
5
Are there "stages of change" in the practice of female genital cutting?: Qualitative research findings from Senegal and The Gambia.女性割礼习俗中是否存在“变革阶段”?来自塞内加尔和冈比亚的定性研究结果。
Afr J Reprod Health. 2006 Aug;10(2):57-71.
6
Conformity and change: community effects on female genital cutting in Kenya.顺应与变革:肯尼亚社区对女性生殖器切割习俗的影响
J Health Soc Behav. 2005 Jun;46(2):121-40. doi: 10.1177/002214650504600201.