Department of Infectious-Tropical Diseases and Microbiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Institute of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Apr 28;15(4):e0009370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009370. eCollection 2021 Apr.
The diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis (CE) is primarily based on imaging, while serology should be applied when imaging is inconclusive. CE cyst stage has been reported among the most important factors influencing the outcome of serodiagnosis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the relation between cyst stage of hepatic CE and diagnostic sensitivity of serological tests, to evaluate whether their relation is a consistent finding and provide guidance for the interpretation of results of serological tests.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Lilacs databases were searched on December 1st 2019. Original studies published after 2003 (year of publication of the CE cyst classification), reporting sensitivity of serological tests applied to the diagnosis of human hepatic CE, as diagnosed and staged by imaging, were included. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data from 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Summary estimates of sensitivities and 95% confidence intervals were obtained using random effects meta-analysis. Overall, test sensitivity was highest in the presence of CE2 and CE3 (CE3a and/or CE3b), and lowest in the presence of CE5 and CE4 cysts. ELISA, ICT and WB showed the highest sensitivities, while IHA performed worst.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results of our study confirm the presence of a clear and consistent relation between cyst stage and serological tests results. Limitations of evidence included the heterogeneity of the antigenic preparations used, which prevented to determine whether the relation between cyst stage and sensitivity was influenced by the type of antigenic preparation, the paucity of studies testing the same panel of sera with different assays, and the lack of studies assessing the performance of the same assay in both field and hospital-based settings. Our results indicate the absolute need to consider cyst staging when evaluating serological results of patients with hepatic CE.
囊性包虫病(CE)的诊断主要基于影像学,而当影像学结果不确定时应应用血清学。CE 囊型阶段已被报道是影响血清学诊断结果的最重要因素之一。我们对肝 CE 囊型阶段与血清学检测诊断敏感性之间的关系进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估它们之间的关系是否是一致的发现,并为血清学检测结果的解释提供指导。
方法/主要发现:2019 年 12 月 1 日,我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL 和 Lilacs 数据库。纳入了 2003 年后(CE 囊型分类发表年)发表的原始研究,这些研究报告了应用于影像学诊断的人类肝 CE 的血清学检测的敏感性和分期。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。meta 分析纳入了 14 项研究的数据。使用随机效应 meta 分析获得了综合估计的敏感性和 95%置信区间。总体而言,CE2 和 CE3(CE3a 和/或 CE3b)存在时检测的敏感性最高,CE5 和 CE4 型囊肿存在时检测的敏感性最低。ELISA、ICT 和 WB 显示出最高的敏感性,而 IHA 表现最差。
结论/意义:我们的研究结果证实了囊型阶段与血清学检测结果之间存在明确而一致的关系。证据的局限性包括使用的抗原制剂的异质性,这使得无法确定囊型阶段和敏感性之间的关系是否受到抗原制剂类型的影响;缺乏用不同检测方法检测相同血清样本的研究;缺乏在现场和医院环境中评估同一检测方法性能的研究。我们的研究结果表明,在评估肝 CE 患者的血清学结果时,绝对需要考虑囊型分期。