• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过数学模型探索 DNA 甲基化和基因表达对泛癌药物反应的影响。

Exploring effects of DNA methylation and gene expression on pan-cancer drug response by mathematical models.

机构信息

College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China.

Department of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150081, China.

出版信息

Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2021 Jul;246(14):1626-1642. doi: 10.1177/15353702211007766. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1177/15353702211007766
PMID:33910405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8326438/
Abstract

Since genetic alteration only accounts for 20%-30% in the drug effect-related factors, the role of epigenetic regulation mechanisms in drug response is gradually being valued. However, how epigenetic changes and abnormal gene expression affect the chemotherapy response remains unclear. Therefore, we constructed a variety of mathematical models based on the integrated DNA methylation, gene expression, and anticancer drug response data of cancer cell lines from pan-cancer levels to identify genes whose DNA methylation is associated with drug response and then to assess the impact of epigenetic regulation of gene expression on the sensitivity of anticancer drugs. The innovation of the mathematical models lies in: Linear regression model is followed by logistic regression model, which greatly shortens the calculation time and ensures the reliability of results by considering the covariates. Second, reconstruction of prediction models based on multiple dataset partition methods not only evaluates the model stability but also optimizes the drug-gene pairs. For 368,520 drug-gene pairs with  < 0.05 in linear models, 999 candidate pairs with both AUC ≥ 0.8 and  < 0.05 were obtained by logistic regression models between drug response and DNA methylation. Then 931 drug-gene pairs with 45 drugs and 491 genes were optimized by model stability assessment. Integrating both DNA methylation and gene expression markedly increased predictive power for 732 drug-gene pairs where 598 drug-gene pairs including 44 drugs and 359 genes were prioritized. Several drug target genes were enriched in the modules of the drug-gene-weighted interaction network. Besides, for cancer driver genes such as , , and , synergistic effects of DNA methylation and gene expression can predict certain anticancer drugs' responses. In summary, we identified potential drug sensitivity-related markers from pan-cancer levels and concluded that synergistic regulation of DNA methylation and gene expression affect anticancer drug response.

摘要

由于遗传改变仅占药物效应相关因素的 20%-30%,因此,表观遗传调控机制在药物反应中的作用逐渐受到重视。然而,表观遗传变化和异常基因表达如何影响化疗反应尚不清楚。因此,我们基于癌症细胞系的综合 DNA 甲基化、基因表达和抗癌药物反应数据,从泛癌水平构建了多种数学模型,以鉴定与药物反应相关的 DNA 甲基化的基因,然后评估基因表达的表观遗传调控对抗癌药物敏感性的影响。数学模型的创新之处在于:线性回归模型后接逻辑回归模型,通过考虑协变量,大大缩短了计算时间并保证了结果的可靠性。其次,基于多种数据集划分方法的预测模型重建不仅评估了模型的稳定性,而且优化了药物-基因对。对于线性模型中 < 0.05 的 368520 个药物-基因对,通过药物反应与 DNA 甲基化之间的逻辑回归模型得到了 999 对候选对,AUC ≥ 0.8 和  < 0.05。然后通过模型稳定性评估优化了 931 对药物-基因对,其中 45 种药物和 491 个基因。整合 DNA 甲基化和基因表达显著提高了 732 对药物-基因对的预测能力,其中包括 44 种药物和 359 个基因的 598 对药物-基因对被优先考虑。药物-基因加权互作网络的模块中富集了几个药物靶基因。此外,对于癌症驱动基因,如 、 、 ,DNA 甲基化和基因表达的协同调节可以预测某些抗癌药物的反应。总之,我们从泛癌水平鉴定了潜在的药物敏感性相关标记物,并得出结论,DNA 甲基化和基因表达的协同调节影响抗癌药物反应。

相似文献

1
Exploring effects of DNA methylation and gene expression on pan-cancer drug response by mathematical models.通过数学模型探索 DNA 甲基化和基因表达对泛癌药物反应的影响。
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2021 Jul;246(14):1626-1642. doi: 10.1177/15353702211007766. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
2
Impact of mutations in DNA methylation modification genes on genome-wide methylation landscapes and downstream gene activations in pan-cancer.泛癌中 DNA 甲基化修饰基因突变对全基因组甲基化景观和下游基因激活的影响。
BMC Med Genomics. 2020 Feb 24;13(Suppl 3):27. doi: 10.1186/s12920-020-0659-4.
3
Genes suppressed by DNA methylation in non-small cell lung cancer reveal the epigenetics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition.在非小细胞肺癌中被DNA甲基化抑制的基因揭示了上皮-间质转化的表观遗传学特征。
BMC Genomics. 2014 Dec 8;15(1):1079. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1079.
4
A Linear Regression and Deep Learning Approach for Detecting Reliable Genetic Alterations in Cancer Using DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Data.基于 DNA 甲基化和基因表达数据的线性回归和深度学习方法在癌症中检测可靠的遗传改变。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Aug 12;11(8):931. doi: 10.3390/genes11080931.
5
Pan-cancer analysis of frequent DNA co-methylation patterns reveals consistent epigenetic landscape changes in multiple cancers.频繁DNA共甲基化模式的泛癌分析揭示了多种癌症中一致的表观遗传景观变化。
BMC Genomics. 2017 Jan 25;18(Suppl 1):1045. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3259-0.
6
Prediction of epigenetically regulated genes in breast cancer cell lines.预测乳腺癌细胞系中受表观遗传调控的基因。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Jun 4;11:305. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-305.
7
Cancer's epigenetic drugs: where are they in the cancer medicines?癌症的表观遗传学药物:它们在癌症药物中处于什么位置?
Pharmacogenomics J. 2020 Jun;20(3):367-379. doi: 10.1038/s41397-019-0138-5. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
8
Drug sensitivity prediction by CpG island methylation profile in the NCI-60 cancer cell line panel.基于NCI-60癌细胞系面板中CpG岛甲基化谱的药物敏感性预测
Cancer Res. 2007 Dec 1;67(23):11335-43. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1502.
9
A pan-cancer analysis of driver gene mutations, DNA methylation and gene expressions reveals that chromatin remodeling is a major mechanism inducing global changes in cancer epigenomes.泛癌症分析驱动基因突变、DNA 甲基化和基因表达,揭示了染色质重塑是诱导癌症表观基因组全局变化的主要机制。
BMC Med Genomics. 2018 Nov 6;11(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12920-018-0425-z.
10
Genome-wide profiling in melatonin-exposed human breast cancer cell lines identifies differentially methylated genes involved in the anticancer effect of melatonin.褪黑素暴露的人乳腺癌细胞系中的全基因组分析鉴定出参与褪黑素抗癌作用的差异甲基化基因。
J Pineal Res. 2013 Jan;54(1):80-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-079X.2012.01027.x. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Transcriptome profiling unveils GAP43 regulates ABC transporters and EIF2 signaling in colorectal cancer cells.转录组分析揭示GAP43在结肠癌细胞中调控ABC转运蛋白和EIF2信号通路。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 5;21(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07728-x.
2
Epigenome-wide DNA methylation analysis of small cell lung cancer cell lines suggests potential chemotherapy targets.对小细胞肺癌细胞系的全基因组 DNA 甲基化分析表明了潜在的化疗靶点。
Clin Epigenetics. 2020 Jun 25;12(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00876-8.
3
ADAM12 is A Potential Therapeutic Target Regulated by Hypomethylation in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.ADAM12 是三阴性乳腺癌中受低甲基化调控的潜在治疗靶点。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jan 30;21(3):903. doi: 10.3390/ijms21030903.
4
and Amplifications Determine Response to HER2 Inhibition in -Amplified Esophagogastric Cancer.和扩增决定了对 HER2 抑制在 - 扩增食管胃交界癌的反应。
Cancer Discov. 2019 Feb;9(2):199-209. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0598. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
5
MCM family in HCC: MCM6 indicates adverse tumor features and poor outcomes and promotes S/G2 cell cycle progression.MCM 家族在 HCC 中的作用:MCM6 预示着不良的肿瘤特征和预后不良,并促进 S/G2 细胞周期进程。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Feb 20;18(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4056-8.
6
Intratumor heterogeneity in epigenetic patterns.肿瘤内表观遗传模式的异质性。
Semin Cancer Biol. 2018 Aug;51:12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Epigenetic biomarkers in gastrointestinal cancers: The current state and clinical perspectives.胃肠道癌症中的表观遗传学标志物:现状与临床展望。
Semin Cancer Biol. 2018 Aug;51:36-49. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
8
Lung cancer epigenetics: From knowledge to applications.肺癌表观遗传学:从知识到应用。
Semin Cancer Biol. 2018 Aug;51:116-128. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
9
Epigenetic drivers of tumourigenesis and cancer metastasis.肿瘤发生和癌症转移的表观遗传驱动因素。
Semin Cancer Biol. 2018 Aug;51:149-159. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
10
FERMT3 contributes to glioblastoma cell proliferation and chemoresistance to temozolomide through integrin mediated Wnt signaling.FERMT3通过整合素介导的Wnt信号通路促进胶质母细胞瘤细胞增殖和对替莫唑胺的化学抗性。
Neurosci Lett. 2017 Sep 14;657:77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.07.057. Epub 2017 Aug 1.