Jang Eunju, Kim Kwangsoon, Jung Chan Kwon, Bae Ja Seong, Kim Jeong Soo
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpodaero, Seoul, 06591, Korea.
Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Apr 12;12:20420188211000500. doi: 10.1177/20420188211000500. eCollection 2021.
Criteria for the preoperative diagnosis of non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) have not yet been confirmed. This study aimed to analyze differences in clinicopathological characteristics between follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) subtypes to determine which parameters are relevant in differentiating NIFTP from other variants.
We retrospectively analyzed the records of 199 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of FVPTC who underwent thyroid surgery at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (Seoul, Korea) from 2011 to 2015. Clinicopathological features were analyzed retrospectively a complete review of medical charts and pathology reports of patients.
The NIFTP and invasive encapsulated FVPTC (EFVPTC) groups showed relatively benign features, with a majority of the patients categorized as Bethesda category III (25.8% and 25.6%, respectively) or IV (34.8% and 30.2%, respectively), while the infiltrative FVPTC group showed more malignant features, with more patients categorized as category V (28.6%) or VI (47.6%) ( < 0.001). mutations were significantly less prevalent in the NIFTP group (0%) and invasive EFVPTC group (4.7%) compared with the infiltrative FVPTC group (34.9%) ( < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that absence of mutation (OR 20.311, = 0.004) and lymph node metastasis (odds ratio 10.237, = 0.004) were significantly associated with NIFTP.
Although Bethesda category was a statistically significant factor in distinguishing FVPTC subtypes, it was not effective in conclusively distinguishing NIFTP and invasive EFVPTC. Absence of mutation and lymph node metastasis are important features in distinguishing NIFTP from other subtypes.
具有乳头状核特征的非侵袭性滤泡性甲状腺肿瘤(NIFTP)的术前诊断标准尚未得到证实。本研究旨在分析甲状腺乳头状癌滤泡变体(FVPTC)各亚型之间临床病理特征的差异,以确定哪些参数与区分NIFTP和其他变体相关。
我们回顾性分析了2011年至2015年在韩国首尔圣玛丽医院接受甲状腺手术的199例术前诊断为FVPTC患者的记录。通过全面回顾患者的病历和病理报告,对临床病理特征进行回顾性分析。
NIFTP组和侵袭性包膜型FVPTC(EFVPTC)组表现出相对良性的特征,大多数患者分类为贝塞斯达Ⅲ类(分别为25.8%和25.6%)或Ⅳ类(分别为34.8%和30.2%),而浸润性FVPTC组表现出更多恶性特征,更多患者分类为Ⅴ类(28.6%)或Ⅵ类(47.6%)(P<0.001)。与浸润性FVPTC组(34.9%)相比,NIFTP组(0%)和侵袭性EFVPTC组(4.7%)的 突变明显较少(P<0.001)。多因素分析显示,无 突变(OR 20.311,P = 0.004)和淋巴结转移(比值比10.237,P = 0.004)与NIFTP显著相关。
虽然贝塞斯达分类在区分FVPTC亚型方面是一个具有统计学意义的因素,但在明确区分NIFTP和侵袭性EFVPTC方面并不有效。无 突变和淋巴结转移是区分NIFTP与其他亚型的重要特征。