University of Münster, Germany.
J Learn Disabil. 2021 Sep;54(5):334-348. doi: 10.1177/00222194211011580. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
In most general education classrooms in Germany, students with and without special educational needs are taught together. To support teachers in adapting instruction to these heterogeneous classrooms, we have developed learning progress assessment (LPA) and reading instructional materials, the (RS), in line with the theoretical framework of data-based decision-making, which has led to beneficial effects in several studies. However, data from these studies have not been analyzed to examine effects for low-performing readers. Data within and across six quasi-experimental studies conducted by our team in Grades 2 to 4 were reanalyzed to examine the effects of LPA on students whose reading fluency scores were at or below the 25th percentile ( = 1,346 students from 264 classes). In each study, students had been assigned to a control group (with business-as-usual instruction), an LPA group only, or an LPA-RS group (i.e., with teachers provided with LPA and the RS). Separate multilevel regression results were integrated by means of meta-analytical methods to investigate the consistency of results. Overall, findings from the single studies indicated no positive effects of LPA with or without the RS compared with the control group. The integrated analyses showed small positive effect trends on reading fluency and intrinsic reading motivation.
在德国的大多数普通教育教室里,有特殊教育需求的学生和没有特殊教育需求的学生一起接受教育。为了支持教师根据这些异质课堂调整教学,我们根据基于数据的决策理论框架,开发了学习进展评估 (LPA) 和阅读教学材料,即 RS,这在几项研究中产生了有益的效果。然而,这些研究的数据尚未进行分析,以检查对低表现读者的效果。我们团队在 2 年级到 4 年级进行的六项准实验研究中的数据进行了重新分析,以检查 LPA 对阅读流利度得分在第 25 百分位或以下的学生(= 264 个班级的 1,346 名学生)的效果。在每项研究中,学生被分配到对照组(接受常规教学)、LPA 组或 LPA-RS 组(即教师提供 LPA 和 RS)。通过元分析方法整合单独的多层回归结果,以调查结果的一致性。总体而言,单项研究的结果表明,与对照组相比,LPA 无论是否有 RS,都没有积极的效果。综合分析显示阅读流利度和内在阅读动机有较小的积极趋势。