• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TruthTrust:众包平台上基于真相推理的信任管理机制

TruthTrust: Truth Inference-Based Trust Management Mechanism on a Crowdsourcing Platform.

作者信息

Zhou Jiyuan, Jin Xing, Yu Lanping, Xue Limin, Ren Yizhi

机构信息

School of Cyberspace, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China.

School of Information Engineering, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 7;21(8):2578. doi: 10.3390/s21082578.

DOI:10.3390/s21082578
PMID:33916964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8067557/
Abstract

On a crowdsourcing platform, in order to cheat for rewards or sabotage the crowdsourcing processes, spam workers may submit numerous erroneous answers to the tasks published by requesters. This type of behavior extremely reduces the completion rate of tasks and the enthusiasm of honest users, which may lead a crowdsourcing platform to a failure. Defending against malicious attacks is an important issue in crowdsourcing, which has been extensively addressed by existing methods, e.g., verification-based defense mechanisms, data analysis solutions, trust-based defense models, and workers' properties matching mechanisms. However, verification-based defense mechanisms will consume a lot of resources, and data analysis solutions cannot motivate workers to provide high-quality services. Trust-based defense models and workers' properties matching mechanisms cannot guarantee the authenticity of information when collusion requesters publish shadow tasks to help malicious workers get more participation opportunities. To defend such collusion attacks in crowdsourcing platforms, we propose a new defense model named TruthTrust. Firstly, we define a complete life cycle system that from users' interaction to workers' recommendation, and separately define the trust value of each worker and the credence of each requester. Secondly, in order to ensure the authenticity of the information, we establish a trust model based on the CRH framework. The calculated truth value and weight are used to define the global properties of workers and requesters. Moreover, we propose a reverse mechanism to improve the resistance under attacks. Finally, extensive experiments demonstrate that TruthTrust significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches in terms of effective task completion rate.

摘要

在众包平台上,为了骗取奖励或破坏众包流程,恶意工人可能会对请求者发布的任务提交大量错误答案。这种行为极大地降低了任务完成率和诚实用户的积极性,可能导致众包平台失败。抵御恶意攻击是众包中的一个重要问题,现有方法已广泛涉及,例如基于验证的防御机制、数据分析解决方案、基于信任的防御模型和工人属性匹配机制。然而,基于验证的防御机制会消耗大量资源,数据分析解决方案无法激励工人提供高质量服务。当勾结请求者发布影子任务以帮助恶意工人获得更多参与机会时,基于信任的防御模型和工人属性匹配机制无法保证信息的真实性。为了抵御众包平台中的此类勾结攻击,我们提出了一种名为TruthTrust的新防御模型。首先,我们定义了一个从用户交互到工人推荐的完整生命周期系统,并分别定义每个工人的信任值和每个请求者的可信度。其次,为了确保信息的真实性,我们基于CRH框架建立了一个信任模型。计算出的真值和权重用于定义工人和请求者的全局属性。此外,我们提出了一种反向机制来提高攻击下的抗性。最后,大量实验表明,TruthTrust在有效任务完成率方面显著优于现有方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/6ea874601567/sensors-21-02578-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/854d40d60b6e/sensors-21-02578-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/f3789f743c15/sensors-21-02578-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/7539c3da2a04/sensors-21-02578-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/3b5f57edb670/sensors-21-02578-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/9039d635057b/sensors-21-02578-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/f18d3cdc7d8b/sensors-21-02578-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/7bd69d0cc21f/sensors-21-02578-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/a2b87036a5a3/sensors-21-02578-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/6ea874601567/sensors-21-02578-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/854d40d60b6e/sensors-21-02578-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/f3789f743c15/sensors-21-02578-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/7539c3da2a04/sensors-21-02578-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/3b5f57edb670/sensors-21-02578-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/9039d635057b/sensors-21-02578-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/f18d3cdc7d8b/sensors-21-02578-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/7bd69d0cc21f/sensors-21-02578-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/a2b87036a5a3/sensors-21-02578-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8067557/6ea874601567/sensors-21-02578-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
TruthTrust: Truth Inference-Based Trust Management Mechanism on a Crowdsourcing Platform.TruthTrust:众包平台上基于真相推理的信任管理机制
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 7;21(8):2578. doi: 10.3390/s21082578.
2
Privacy-Preserving Task-Matching and Multiple-Submissions Detection in Crowdsourcing.众包中的隐私保护任务匹配和多次提交检测。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 26;21(9):3036. doi: 10.3390/s21093036.
3
An experimental characterization of workers' behavior and accuracy in crowdsourced tasks.众包任务中工人行为和准确性的实验特征描述。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 16;16(6):e0252604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252604. eCollection 2021.
4
Crowdsourcing for Machine Learning in Public Health Surveillance: Lessons Learned From Amazon Mechanical Turk.公共卫生监测中机器学习的众包:从亚马逊土耳其机器人学到的经验教训。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 18;24(1):e28749. doi: 10.2196/28749.
5
Toward Efficient Team Formation for Crowdsourcing in Noncooperative Social Networks.面向非合作社交网络众包的高效团队形成。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2017 Dec;47(12):4208-4222. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2016.2602498. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
6
A Blockchain-Based Spatial Crowdsourcing System for Spatial Information Collection Using a Reward Distribution.基于区块链的空间众包系统,利用奖励分配进行空间信息采集。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 29;21(15):5146. doi: 10.3390/s21155146.
7
Algorithmic Management for Improving Collective Productivity in Crowdsourcing.算法管理在众包中提高集体生产力。
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 2;7(1):12541. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12757-x.
8
An Incentive Mechanism in Mobile Crowdsourcing Based on Multi-Attribute Reverse Auctions.基于多属性逆向拍卖的移动众包中的激励机制。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Oct 14;18(10):3453. doi: 10.3390/s18103453.
9
Mitigating Herding in Hierarchical Crowdsourcing Networks.减轻分层众包网络中的羊群效应
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 5;6(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0011-6.
10
Label Consistency-Based Ground Truth Inference for Crowdsourcing.基于标签一致性的众包真值推断
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2025 May;36(5):9408-9421. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2024.3438680. Epub 2025 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of latent profiles and affected factors according to the implementation of a protection system against customer bullying in Korea.根据韩国针对顾客霸凌的保护系统实施情况对潜在概况及影响因素进行分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 19;22(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12743-7.
2
Research on the Relationship Between Service Guarantee Perception and Customer Value in the Chinese Context.中国背景下服务保障感知与顾客价值的关系研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 5;12:766098. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.766098. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
NWPU-Crowd: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Crowd Counting and Localization.西工大人群计数数据集:大规模人群计数和定位基准数据集
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2021 Jun;43(6):2141-2149. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3013269. Epub 2021 May 11.
2
On the Discovery of Evolving Truth.关于不断演变的真理的发现。
KDD. 2015 Aug;2015:675-684. doi: 10.1145/2783258.2783277.