• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《2005-2019 年期间以色列与牙周治疗相关的牙医索赔发生率和性质》。

The Incidence and Nature of Claims against Dentists Related to Periodontal Treatment in Israel during the Years 2005-2019.

机构信息

The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel.

General Practitioner, Private Clinic, Tel-Aviv 6100000, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 14;18(8):4153. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084153.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18084153
PMID:33919971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8070963/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years, worldwide dental malpractice claims have dramatically increased. The purpose of the present study is to analyze periodontal therapy related claims in Israel that led to legal decisions.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study includes malpractice claims against dental practitioners related to periodontology between 2005 and 2019. Only closed cases where a final decision was made were included. The chi-square test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables were performed and a value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

During the study period there were 508 legal claims related to periodontal disease. Most plaintiffs were women (63.4%), and 71.3% of the patients were >35 years old. Most claims (82.8%) were settled out of court and ended in compromise. Claims concerning the treatment of periodontal disease by periodontists accounted only for 4.5% (23/508) of the cases while 95.5% (485/508) of the claims were for complications secondary to another treatment. Prosthodontic treatment was involved with the highest number 54.5%, followed by dental implants 17.7%, and endodontics 11.6%. The allegations were related to pain and distress (84.8%), aggravation of existent periodontal disease (83.3%), tooth loss (78.1%), and violation of autonomy (47%).

CONCLUSIONS

The main cause for lawsuits was related to aggravation of periodontal disease during prosthetic or implant therapy and related to suspected faulty or inexistent preoperative diagnosis and planning.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Periodontal consultation before dental treatment may reduce malpractice risks, adverse events, and un-necessary changes of treatment plans.

摘要

背景

近年来,全球牙科医疗事故索赔大幅增加。本研究的目的是分析导致法律判决的以色列牙周病治疗相关索赔。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括 2005 年至 2019 年期间与牙周病相关的针对牙科医生的医疗事故索赔。仅纳入有最终判决的已结案病例。对分类变量使用卡方检验或 Fisher 精确检验, 检验水准为 0.05。

结果

在研究期间,有 508 起与牙周病相关的法律索赔。大多数原告为女性(63.4%),71.3%的患者年龄>35 岁。大多数索赔(82.8%)通过庭外和解解决并达成妥协。牙周病治疗相关的索赔仅占索赔总数的 4.5%(23/508),而 95.5%(485/508)的索赔是由于其他治疗的并发症引起的。涉及最多的治疗是修复治疗(54.5%),其次是种植治疗(17.7%)和牙髓治疗(11.6%)。指控与疼痛和不适(84.8%)、牙周病恶化(83.3%)、牙齿丧失(78.1%)和侵犯自主权(47%)有关。

结论

诉讼的主要原因与修复或种植治疗期间牙周病恶化以及疑似错误或不存在术前诊断和计划有关。

临床意义

在牙科治疗前进行牙周咨询可能会降低医疗事故风险、不良事件和不必要的治疗计划变更。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea1/8070963/dd5d09d7d53e/ijerph-18-04153-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea1/8070963/900ffd7f8f24/ijerph-18-04153-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea1/8070963/dd5d09d7d53e/ijerph-18-04153-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea1/8070963/900ffd7f8f24/ijerph-18-04153-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea1/8070963/dd5d09d7d53e/ijerph-18-04153-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Incidence and Nature of Claims against Dentists Related to Periodontal Treatment in Israel during the Years 2005-2019.《2005-2019 年期间以色列与牙周治疗相关的牙医索赔发生率和性质》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 14;18(8):4153. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084153.
2
Incidence and nature of claims against dental practitioners for dental implant treatment in Israel between 2005 and 2015.2005年至2015年间以色列牙科医生因种植牙治疗面临索赔的发生率及索赔性质。
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2021 Mar 16;14(1):57-66.
3
The Incidence and Nature of Malpractice Claims against Dentists for Orthodontic Treatment with Periodontal Damage in Israel during the Years 2005-2018-A Descriptive Study.《2005-2018 年以色列因牙周损伤的正畸治疗而针对牙医的医疗事故索赔的发生率和性质:一项描述性研究》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 26;17(23):8785. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238785.
4
The nature of malpractice claims related to nerve damage after dental implants insertion in Israel during 2005-2020: A descriptive study.2005-2020 年以色列种植牙术后神经损伤相关医疗事故索赔的性质:一项描述性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Feb;25(1):195-199. doi: 10.1111/cid.13163. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
5
Professional liability: assessment of court sentences for lawsuits against dentists in Peru.专业责任:秘鲁针对牙医诉讼的法院判决评估。
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2021 Aug 30;39(2):15-20.
6
A five-year survey for dental malpractice claims in Tehran, Iran.伊朗德黑兰为期五年的牙科医疗事故索赔调查。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2009 Feb;16(2):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2008.08.016. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
7
Trigeminal nerve injuries following dental procedures: A retrospective analysis of malpractice claims from 2016 to 2023 in South Korea.牙科治疗后发生的三叉神经损伤:韩国 2016 年至 2023 年医疗事故索赔的回顾性分析。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2024 Aug;106:102730. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2024.102730. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
8
A survey: how periodontists and other dental professionals view the scope of periodontics.一项调查:牙周病专家及其他牙科专业人员如何看待牙周病学的范畴。
J Periodontol. 2014 Jul;85(7):925-33. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.130482. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
9
Analysis of professional malpractice claims in implant dentistry in Italy from insurance company technical reports, 2006 to 2010.基于保险公司技术报告对2006年至2010年意大利种植牙科医疗事故索赔情况的分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Sep-Oct;29(5):1177-84. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3486.
10
Operator-related aspects in endodontic malpractice claims in Finland.芬兰牙髓病医疗事故索赔中与操作者相关的方面。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2017 Apr;75(3):155-160. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2016.1272000. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Two decades of dental malpractice litigations in Türkiye: a retrospective matched cohort study analyzing legal and clinical outcomes.土耳其二十年牙科医疗事故诉讼:一项分析法律和临床结果的回顾性匹配队列研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05838-1.
2
Dealing with Evidence in Dental Professional Liability Lawsuits-General Recommendations for Dental Expert Witness Work Using the Example of Germany: A Narrative Review.牙科医疗事故责任诉讼中的证据处理——以德国为例的牙科专家证人工作的一般建议:叙述性综述
Eur J Dent. 2025 Feb;19(1):1-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788320. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
3
Dentists' perspectives, practices, and factors associated with informed consent process for fixed prosthodontic treatment: a cross-sectional study of kampala metropolitan area, Uganda.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence and nature of claims against dental practitioners for dental implant treatment in Israel between 2005 and 2015.2005年至2015年间以色列牙科医生因种植牙治疗面临索赔的发生率及索赔性质。
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2021 Mar 16;14(1):57-66.
2
Characteristics of National Malpractice Claims in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.口腔颌面外科全国医疗事故索赔的特点。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Aug;78(8):1314-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.03.015. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
3
Recent epidemiologic trends in periodontitis in the USA.美国牙周炎的近期流行病学趋势。
牙医师对固定义齿治疗之告知同意书的看法、实务与相关因素:乌干达坎帕拉都会区之横断研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 27;24(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04380-w.
4
Dental malpractice lawsuit in the madinah region.麦地那地区的牙科医疗事故诉讼。
Saudi Dent J. 2024 May;36(5):795-798. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.02.009. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
5
A Clinician's Perspective on the Accuracy of the Shade Determination of Dental Ceramics-A Systematic Review.临床医生对牙科陶瓷颜色测定准确性的观点——一项系统评价
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 27;14(3):252. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030252.
6
Dental malpractice lawsuit cases in Saudi Arabia: A national study.沙特阿拉伯的牙科医疗事故诉讼案件:一项全国性研究。
Saudi Dent J. 2022 Dec;34(8):763-771. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
7
A retrospective assessment of the dental malpractice cases filed in Riyadh from 2009-2015.对2009年至2015年在利雅得提起的牙科医疗事故案件进行的回顾性评估。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Jun;11(6):2729-2734. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2250_21. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
Periodontol 2000. 2020 Feb;82(1):257-267. doi: 10.1111/prd.12323.
4
Complaints about dental practitioners: an analysis of 6 years of complaints about dentists, dental prosthetists, oral health therapists, dental therapists and dental hygienists in Australia.对牙科从业者的投诉:对澳大利亚6年来针对牙医、牙科技师、口腔健康治疗师、牙科治疗师和牙科保健员的投诉分析。
Aust Dent J. 2018 Jun 4;63(3):285-93. doi: 10.1111/adj.12625.
5
A 15 years survey for dental malpractice claims in Rome, Italy.意大利罗马为期15年的牙科医疗事故索赔调查。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2018 Aug;58:74-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 8.
6
Aspects of Malpractice in Prosthodontics.修复牙科中的医疗事故问题。
J Prosthodont. 2017 Dec;26(8):672-681. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12636. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
7
Interdisciplinary periodontics: the multidisciplinary approach to the planning and treatment of complex cases.口腔多学科:复杂病例规划和治疗的多学科方法。
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Jun;74(1):7-10. doi: 10.1111/prd.12187.
8
Effect of orthodontic treatment on the periodontal tissues.正畸治疗对牙周组织的影响。
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Jun;74(1):140-157. doi: 10.1111/prd.12194.
9
Chronic periodontitis and implant dentistry.慢性牙周炎与种植修复
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Jun;74(1):63-73. doi: 10.1111/prd.12190.
10
Interaction between endodontics and periodontics.牙髓病学与牙周病学的交互作用。
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Jun;74(1):11-39. doi: 10.1111/prd.12188.